YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community


Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us.

Go Back   YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community > YorkieTalk > General Yorkshire Terrier Discussion
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar JavaChat Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2014, 03:16 PM   #226
YT 500 Club Member
 
Oddsock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South Yorkshire,England
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britster View Post
I am neither here nor there with the issue myself. I feel like that there are pretty much equal pros/cons on both sides and I personally will likely always have my pets fixed (at an appropriate age) because 1) I'm lazy and 2) dog balls , I think they're ugly. And I will likely always have males. But I likely won't until 10 months++.

It keeps being mentioned that Gail has a motive or a bias, but I don't see how Ladyjane's position should be viewed upon differently, you obviously have a bias as well working in rescue. You see unfathomable things and very stupid dog owners. It's understandable that you would view this differently. But there's a whole 'nother world of dog ownership out there, i.e. dog sports for example. When you are raising/training an athlete, of sorts, there's lots of reasons you want to keep those hormones as well as delaying or never fixing. Go hang around an agility class for a while and you will see a ton of responsible owners who wish to keep their dog intact, and these are not your average joe schmo who are just going to let their dog get bred to any dog. This is not a black and white issue and I think we all need to remember and attempt to see the entire dog community from different perspectives.
:thum bup:
__________________

Caleb Pippi
Oddsock is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome Guest!
Not Registered?

Join today and remove this ad!

Old 06-18-2014, 06:17 PM   #227
Resident Yorkie Nut Donating YT 20K Club Member
 
ladyjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 27,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britster View Post
I am neither here nor there with the issue myself. I feel like that there are pretty much equal pros/cons on both sides and I personally will likely always have my pets fixed (at an appropriate age) because 1) I'm lazy and 2) dog balls , I think they're ugly. And I will likely always have males. But I likely won't until 10 months++.

It keeps being mentioned that Gail has a motive or a bias, but I don't see how Ladyjane's position should be viewed upon differently, you obviously have a bias as well working in rescue. You see unfathomable things and very stupid dog owners. It's understandable that you would view this differently. But there's a whole 'nother world of dog ownership out there, i.e. dog sports for example. When you are raising/training an athlete, of sorts, there's lots of reasons you want to keep those hormones as well as delaying or never fixing. Go hang around an agility class for a while and you will see a ton of responsible owners who wish to keep their dog intact, and these are not your average joe schmo who are just going to let their dog get bred to any dog. This is not a black and white issue and I think we all need to remember and attempt to see the entire dog community from different perspectives.
Brit, you clearly have not read all of my posts. Yes, I am in rescue and, yes, I cannot stand that there are so many irresponsible people in this world. BUT, I have made plenty of comments on this thread that have absolutely nothing, zero to do with rescue thoughts/influence.

I am not going to repeat myself...go back and read what I said...THEN, make your comments.

I said the breeders are ruining some of the breeds...definitely yorkies....and I said that you cannot compare a torn CCL to mammary tumors....just one position that I have stated. I said that the breeders are behind all of this as a way to take the heat off themselves for the messes they have created. I don't for one minute believe that torn CCLs in yorkies has anything to do with early spay/neuter. I believe it is a breeder induced issue as in genetic mess. Luxating patellas are so common now it is ridiculous and they are what leads to torn CCLs most of the time. Sheesh........ As I suggested, go read before making such a suggestion!

We hold puppies in our rescue for six months and then spay/neuter....IF it were absolutely proven that harm was being done (note there is no proof of this), then we would hold them until suggested. When it becomes absolutely true and not someones ideas/guesses/thoughts, then I will believe it. Not until then.

Last edited by ladyjane; 06-18-2014 at 06:19 PM.
ladyjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 06:20 PM   #228
Resident Yorkie Nut Donating YT 20K Club Member
 
ladyjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 27,448
Default

And, by the way, how many of the people who come to YT are raising athletic yorkies?
ladyjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 06:23 PM   #229
♥ Maximo and Teddy
Donating Member
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 25,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britster View Post
I am neither here nor there with the issue myself. I feel like that there are pretty much equal pros/cons on both sides and I personally will likely always have my pets fixed (at an appropriate age) because 1) I'm lazy and 2) dog balls , I think they're ugly. And I will likely always have males. But I likely won't until 10 months++.

It keeps being mentioned that Gail has a motive or a bias, but I don't see how Ladyjane's position should be viewed upon differently, you obviously have a bias as well working in rescue. You see unfathomable things and very stupid dog owners. It's understandable that you would view this differently. But there's a whole 'nother world of dog ownership out there, i.e. dog sports for example. When you are raising/training an athlete, of sorts, there's lots of reasons you want to keep those hormones as well as delaying or never fixing. Go hang around an agility class for a while and you will see a ton of responsible owners who wish to keep their dog intact, and these are not your average joe schmo who are just going to let their dog get bred to any dog. This is not a black and white issue and I think we all need to remember and attempt to see the entire dog community from different perspectives.
I admitted this superficial feeling of mine to someone in private. It's not completely superficial. I think part of it is that I so strongly support neutering for pets that the sight throws me back.

I understand what you are saying about people with sporting dogs, and this might apply to some with working dogs too. Likely much more responsible about everything than the average pet person. I would be interested in knowing what percentage of them are neutered, and what percentage of the pet population do they make up? With a sporting dog in particular, I'm guessing they are well bred or selected carefully, otherwise they would not advance in their sports.

So far, my neutered boys' legs and hips appear to be in great shape. Spines good too. Muscle tone very good. This is all without the benefit of off leash running outdoors. I bet they would be even better if we had a safe place.

I believe from reading YT for several years, the majority of cases of LP are initially diagnosed very early, before spay/neuter. Wonder how much we would learn about genetic (poor breeding) produced ortho problems if all Yorkie puppies were thoroughly screened before spay/neuter.
__________________
Kristin, Max and Teddy

Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 06:42 AM   #230
Donating YT 500 Club Member
 
Rachael1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Burbs of DC
Posts: 2,198
Default

One of my collegues breeds Great Danes. He and his wife show and I would consider them responsible breeders. I think their stance on the spay/neuter in larger breed dogs is to wait until at least 18 months to allow for growth plate development. Based on research, it seems as though large breed dogs may have some difficulty since they grow to adulthood longer by 2-3 years old.

For yorkies or other small breed dogs I'm not sure how altering the dog prior to 18 months will change the outcome of the health of the animal.

This surely has been an interesting thread to read. I now have a female dog and I don't ever want to deal with a dog in heat so I plan to spay by 6 months (plus it's part of my breeder contract). This is my snobby thing, I don't want to deal with anyone's menstrual cycle but my own.
__________________
Owned by Troy(RIP) & Emma
Rachael1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 06:59 AM   #231
Furbutts = LOVE
Donating Member
Moderator
 
Wylie's Mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 35,889
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael1983 View Post
This is my snobby thing, I don't want to deal with anyone's menstrual cycle but my own.
LMBO - CLASSIC! Thanks for adding a little levity to this subject . And you have a very good point!
__________________
~ A friend told me I was delusional. I nearly fell off my unicorn. ~

°¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨° Ann | Pfeiffer | Marcel Verdel Purcell | Wylie | Artie °¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨°
Wylie's Mom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:13 AM   #232
Furbutts = LOVE
Donating Member
Moderator
 
Wylie's Mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 35,889
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane View Post
Brit, you clearly have not read all of my posts. Yes, I am in rescue and, yes, I cannot stand that there are so many irresponsible people in this world. BUT, I have made plenty of comments on this thread that have absolutely nothing, zero to do with rescue thoughts/influence.

I am not going to repeat myself...go back and read what I said...THEN, make your comments.

I said the breeders are ruining some of the breeds...definitely yorkies....and I said that you cannot compare a torn CCL to mammary tumors....just one position that I have stated. I said that the breeders are behind all of this as a way to take the heat off themselves for the messes they have created. I don't for one minute believe that torn CCLs in yorkies has anything to do with early spay/neuter. I believe it is a breeder induced issue as in genetic mess. Luxating patellas are so common now it is ridiculous and they are what leads to torn CCLs most of the time. Sheesh........ As I suggested, go read before making such a suggestion!

We hold puppies in our rescue for six months and then spay/neuter....IF it were absolutely proven that harm was being done (note there is no proof of this), then we would hold them until suggested. When it becomes absolutely true and not someones ideas/guesses/thoughts, then I will believe it. Not until then.
I'm not speaking for Brit, but the way I read her post was that after she read the thread, she felt that it appeared there were some *very* strong pro-s/n advocates on this thread. Which is fine/great - nothing wrong w/ that. But I think she was seeing Gemy being a bit attacked for having some 'position', per se, while others who have the 'opposing position' (again, per se, not in fact) appeared to not allow the room for having a discussion or having an alternate position. I think she was saying "if we allow one position, why aren't we allowing all positions?" (with which, I agree). That was my take on her take . Now, your take of my take on her take could be completely different!

And just to be clear, I'm not saying you're pro this or anti that - only you can tell us your position, or whether you have one.

At the end of the day, this is a good discussion where we shouldn't worry (imho) about who supports this or that, but rather about how s/n affects our pets and why we make the decisions we do regarding their health...and how all this relates to current/past data and studies.
__________________
~ A friend told me I was delusional. I nearly fell off my unicorn. ~

°¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨° Ann | Pfeiffer | Marcel Verdel Purcell | Wylie | Artie °¨¨¨°ºOº°¨¨¨°
Wylie's Mom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 07:29 AM   #233
T. Bumpkins & Co.
Donating YT Member
 
107barney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 9,816
Default

Athletic yorkies? ROFLMAO. I have a bunch of couch potatoes at home. Actually, I'm kidding, my dogs are very active and have a nice musculature to their lean bodies.

In regards to early neutering, I have a beautiful almost 14-year old male that was early neutered. Too early by today's 6-month common practice. He has been a predominantly healthy yorkie. He was diagnosed at 8 weeks of age (before he was neutered) with bilateral medial luxating patellas (grade I on one side and grade II on the other).

At age 11.5 he jumped off a bed onto a hardwood floor. He fully tore his CCL, tore his medial meniscus and knocked his knee out from a grade II to a grade III. His doctor said that this was a catastrophic injury...an accident.

We all know that a medial patellar luxation (MPL) is a GENETIC issue. Because of this genetic issue it sets the stage for a tear of a CCL. Dogs who have genetic MPL like our yorkies have a medial rotation of the tibial crest which in turn, causes a tension on the CCL. This is what predisposes Yorkies with MPL to tear their CCL. It makes sense that the worse the MPL, the more medial rotation of the tibial crest there will be, and thus more tension on the CCL leading to a tear. It's why many older dogs with MPLs tear their CCLs -- they've had a lifetime of tension on the CCL. Thus, it is GENETICS and TIBIAL FORCES (coupled at times with age) that tear CCLs in these yorkies, regardless of neuter status.

My beautiful Barney is now almost 14 years old. He not only survived his early neuter, but he has aged very well and almost everyone who meets him cannot believe he is 14. He could easily pass for a much younger dog. Yes, he tore his CCL, but that's a result of poor breeding and a MPL that set the stage for tibial crest rotation and tension on the CCL over his lifetime. A jump off the bed was the "event" that caused the catastrophic injury. The last straw, so to speak.

I can't change his genetics and I certainly can't change the hearts and minds of breeders who don't want to eliminate dogs from their lines that should not be bred (note that my other dog has at least 6 medical problems and 5 are genetic conditions, and that is VERY wrong). Despite this, I can decide how I will take care of my dogs to help offset the very core problems that they were born with. I want nothing more than a few more years with my senior dog, but know that I don't decide the day or the hour or the minute.

I wish you all the same enjoyment of many years with your yorkies. I would not change one thing with mine, including the decisions to neuter them.
__________________
Washable Doggie Pee Pads (Save 10% Enter YTSAVE10 at checkout)
Cathy, Teddy, Winston and Baby Clyde...RIP angels Barney and Daisy
107barney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:13 AM   #234
YT 3000 Club Member
 
pstinard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Urbana, IL USA
Posts: 3,648
Default Patellar luxation, CCL tears, and spaying--no firm conclusions on cause and effect.

To add to the conversation, I found this 2010 research article. The meatiest parts of the article are copied below. Parts of the article that I did not copy are represented by [...]. I bolded the parts that are related to spaying and/or Yorkshire Terriers, as well as the main conclusions. With respect to the effect of spaying on the development of luxating patella and CCL rupture, the authors note an increase in the rate of these two conditions in spayed dogs. HOWEVER, they do not draw any conclusions as to cause and effect. Clearly, more research is needed to determine if there is cause and effect, and if so, what the underlying mechanism is.

Severity of patellar luxation and frequency of concomitant cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 162 cases (2004–2007). Courtney A. Campbell, dvm; Christopher L. Horstman, dvm, ms, dacvs; David R. Mason, bvetmed, dacvs; Richard B. Evans, phd. AVMA, Vol 236, No. 8, April 15, 2010.

Summary:

Objective—To evaluate severity of medial patellar luxation (MPL) and frequency of con- comitant cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) in dogs.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Animals—162 dogs (266 stifle joints).

Procedures—Medical records of 162 small-breed dogs with MPL were reviewed. Signalment, body weight, luxation grade, bilateral or unilateral MPL, CCLR, and difference in luxation grades between stifle joints were evaluated. Association between severity of MPL and CCLR was investigated.

Results—58 dogs had unilateral MPL, and 104 dogs had bilateral MPL. Dogs ranged from 8.4 months to 16.7 years of age (mean, 5.7 years), and mean body weight was 5.45 kg (12 lb). Forty-one percent of all dogs had concomitant CCLR. Mean age for dogs with MPL alone was 3.0 years, which differed significantly from mean age of dogs with MPL and concomitant CCLR (7.8 years). Dogs with grade IV MPL were significantly more likely to have concomitant CCLR than were dogs with any other grade of MPL. In dogs with bilateral MPL and unilateral CCLR, there was a significantly higher grade of luxation in the stifle joint with CCLR.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Small-breed dogs with MPL and concomitant CCLR were older than were dogs with only MPL. Dogs with grade IV MPL were more likely to have CCLR than were dogs with other grades of MPL. Most dogs with concomitant CCLR had a higher MPL grade in the affected stifle joint than in the intact joint. These findings should be beneficial in client education and clinical diagnosis. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;236:887–891)

Introduction

Medial patellar luxation is one of the most common conditions affecting the stifle joint in dogs.1–4 Small-breed dogs are 12 times as likely to be affected by MPL as are large-breed dogs.5,6 Breed predilections have been reported for the Boston Terrier, Chihuahua, Pomeranian, Miniature Poodle, and Yorkshire Terrier.1,4,6 In these breeds as well as in others, luxation of the patella is primarily a developmental condition, with traumatic luxation being less common.3,7 A low-grade MPL may not result in clinical signs and frequently is an incidental finding during physical examination.3,7

Similarly, CCLR is a common disease affecting the stifle joint in dogs.3,7–9 Cruciate ligament disease has been recognized in both large- and small-breed dogs, with dogs of the Miniature Poodle, Lhasa Apso, Maltese, and Pomeranian breeds being the most frequently affected small-breed dogs.3,7,9

Definitive causes for MPL and CCLR have not been elucidated; however, it has been suggested that they have different causes.1–3,5 Classically, skeletal abnormalities associated with MPL are a shallow trochlear sulcus and medial displacement of the tibial tuberosity.2,3,5 Other skeletal abnormalities suggested to contribute to this condition are genu varum, hypoplasia of the medial femoral condyle, medial bowing of the proximal portion of the tibia, coxa vara, and internal rotation of the pes.3,7,8,10 Many causes of CCLR have been investigated, and common etiopathogeneses include trauma, age-associated degeneration of the ligament, immune- mediated disease, conformational abnormalities, and processes associated with breed, sex, and tibial plateau angle.3,7,8

Patients with bilateral MPL may have clinical signs in a chronic or intermittent manner or may be com- pletely devoid of clinical signs of the condition.3,7,11 When a dog with chronic MPL develops an acute hind limb lameness, concomitant CCLR should be considered.3,7 The suggested pathogenesis for dogs with MPL that develop concomitant CCLR is an increase in strain on the ligament as a result of anatomic abnormalities associated with MPL.3,7,12 Conversely, investigators have hypothesized that dogs with CCLR with no previous history of an MPL may acquire an MPL as a result of the increased internal rotation of the tibia once the cranial cruciate ligament has ruptured.3,12

To our knowledge, there are no published studies confirming an association between the grade of MPL and frequency of CCLR in small-breed dogs. The objective of the study reported here was to determine whether there was a relationship between the grade of MPL and frequency of CCLR in a population of dogs. We hypothesized that dogs with an increase in the grade of MPL would be more likely to have a concomitant CCLR and that the grade of MPL would be greater in the stifle joint with the concomitant CCLR.

[...]

Discussion

The most common breeds affected with MPL in the study reported here were the Chihuahua and Yorkshire Terrier, which corroborates results of a report14 in which there was overrepresentation of Chihuahuas. In another study,4 the Miniature Poodle was the breed most commonly affected. This finding may be explained by the hospital population evaluated in our study.

The sex distribution for patellar luxation in the present study was a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.3, which is consistent with the ratio of 1:1.5 in small-breed dogs reported in other studies4,7,14 but is in contrast to the sex distribution (male-to-female ratio, 1.8:1) reported in large-breed dogs.4,15 In the present study, spayed or neutered dogs were more likely to have MPL. These findings are in agreement with those of another report16 in which investigators detected a higher incidence of patellar luxation in spayed females.16 The findings of the present study may be attributable to our study population, an increase in spaying and neutering, or a true increase in the prevalence of MPL in dogs that have been spayed or neutered. We believe that our study population is representative of that at most referral institutions because there is a great number of similarities between our study population and the study populations in other investigations.

In the study reported here, we hypothesized that higher grades of MPL would be associated with an increase in the frequency of concomitant CCLR. We found that dogs with grade IV MPL were significantly (P = 0.02) more likely to have concomitant CCLR than were dogs with all other grades of luxation.

[...]

To our knowledge, there have been no reports of the small-breed dogs most commonly affected or the sex of dogs with MPL and concomitant CCLR. In the study reported here, the Yorkshire Terrier and spayed female dogs were slightly overrepresented. The study revealed a significant association between age and concomitant CCLR. Mean age at which dogs with concomitant CCLR were identified (7.8 years) was significantly higher than the mean age of dogs in which MPL alone was identified (3.0 years). This is consistent with results of studies3,4 in which middle-aged to older dogs with patellar luxation appeared to be at an increased risk of developing CCLR. The overall incidence of MPL with concomitant CCLR of 25% in the study reported here was higher than that in other reports4,15,24,25; however, those studies did not have strict exclusionary criteria with regard to breed.

[...]

In conclusion, middle-aged to older dogs and dogs with grade IV MPL were at an increased risk for developing CCLR. Dogs with bilateral patellar luxation and concomitant unilateral CCLR were more likely to have a higher score for grade of luxation in the cranial cruciate ligament–deficient stifle joint. Studies are warranted to evaluate the reproducibility of the results reported here, in addition to results for follow-up monitoring, radiography, physical examination findings, and other factors that influence MPL and concomitant CCLR.
pstinard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:19 AM   #235
♥ Maximo and Teddy
Donating Member
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 25,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wylie's Mom View Post
I'm not speaking for Brit, but the way I read her post was that after she read the thread, she felt that it appeared there were some *very* strong pro-s/n advocates on this thread. Which is fine/great - nothing wrong w/ that. But I think she was seeing Gemy being a bit attacked for having some 'position', per se, while others who have the 'opposing position' (again, per se, not in fact) appeared to not allow the room for having a discussion or having an alternate position. I think she was saying "if we allow one position, why aren't we allowing all positions?" (with which, I agree). That was my take on her take . Now, your take of my take on her take could be completely different!

And just to be clear, I'm not saying you're pro this or anti that - only you can tell us your position, or whether you have one.

At the end of the day, this is a good discussion where we shouldn't worry (imho) about who supports this or that, but rather about how s/n affects our pets and why we make the decisions we do regarding their health...and how all this relates to current/past data and studies.
I agree, but my take on how this thread progressed is different. I do not believe it is anyone's intention to attack or not allow different positions.

My take is that some participating in this thread think some of the discussion is interfering with the presentation of science. Gail's first post includes her own conclusions about spay/neuter. The research being posted also includes conclusions that go beyond strict data.

I would not make a decision to neuter based solely on a set of statistics, same as I would not make the decision to neuter just because I was told to do it or not do it. That is why I think the discussion should include more.

Science doesn't exist in a vacuum. The health impact of spay/neuter goes beyond what we can find in blood tests and xrays. The 'human convenience' factor, for instance, impacts the health of the pet immeasurably by contributing to the likeliness of a happy life. The articles posted discuss this.
__________________
Kristin, Max and Teddy

Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:22 AM   #236
Resident Yorkie Nut Donating YT 20K Club Member
 
ladyjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 27,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wylie's Mom View Post
I'm not speaking for Brit, but the way I read her post was that after she read the thread, she felt that it appeared there were some *very* strong pro-s/n advocates on this thread. Which is fine/great - nothing wrong w/ that. But I think she was seeing Gemy being a bit attacked for having some 'position', per se, while others who have the 'opposing position' (again, per se, not in fact) appeared to not allow the room for having a discussion or having an alternate position. I think she was saying "if we allow one position, why aren't we allowing all positions?" (with which, I agree). That was my take on her take . Now, your take of my take on her take could be completely different!

And just to be clear, I'm not saying you're pro this or anti that - only you can tell us your position, or whether you have one.

At the end of the day, this is a good discussion where we shouldn't worry (imho) about who supports this or that, but rather about how s/n affects our pets and why we make the decisions we do regarding their health...and how all this relates to current/past data and studies.


I know why Brit did it, but it made zero sense to me. Why is it that if people voice opposing opinions, there are those who feel the need to protect others? The problem I had was the analogy....I don't go around on YT telling people to alter their pets.

My position is that this discussion is not fact based; therefore it concerns me greatly in terms of what the overall good is for people who come to YT for information about altering their yorkies.
ladyjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:33 AM   #237
Action Jackson ♥
Donating Member
 
Britster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,814
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximo View Post
I agree, but my take on how this thread progressed is different. I do not believe it is anyone's intention to attack or not allow different positions.

My take is that some participating in this thread think some of the discussion is interfering with the presentation of science. Gail's first post includes her own conclusions about spay/neuter. The research being posted also includes conclusions that go beyond strict data.

I would not make a decision to neuter based solely on a set of statistics, same as I would not make the decision to neuter just because I was told to do it or not do it. That is why I think the discussion should include more.

Science doesn't exist in a vacuum. The health impact of spay/neuter goes beyond what we can find in blood tests and xrays. The 'human convenience' factor, for instance, impacts the health of the pet immeasurably by contributing to the likeliness of a happy life. The articles posted discuss this.
Exactly. And yes Wylie's Mom, you posted what I was thinking as well.

I'm glad you all think athletic Yorkies is some kind of a joke. God forbid you keep a Yorkie in shape. I'm glad you're happy with couch potatoes. But I was actually referring to dogs in general. I didn't know that wasn't allowed anymore on YT, simply because it's a yorkie based forum? All I meant was there is a world out there, of dog sports, where these dogs are trained as athletes. Keeping them intact is often beneficial for these dogs. All I meant by that.

I made a pretty simple straight to the point post and stated my dogs will always be fixed, and that I don't think there's enough pros/cons on either side to really care all that much. And I do agree the general dog owning population should have fixed dogs. There's nothing wrong with discussions on a forum, however. I did not know we had to be so careful what we say in case non-members read our threads. In that case, what's the point in even discussing anything anymore? Anyone can Google and find an answer their happy with.

Fwiw, 83% of 83.3 million dogs have been surgically altered to have their reproductive organs removed in the US. That is 69 million spayed and neutered dogs. I'd say a majority of the US has altered dogs so I'm really not overly concerned with responsible breeders and responsible owners having a choice as to whether they went their dogs reproductive organs removed. And for the losers who just let their dogs roam free, impregnate whatever dog they see, and have the thousands of puppies per year that wind up in shelters? Well, they're idiots. Maybe eventually they'll learn, but maybe not.

Ladyjane, I'm not sure why the long post SHEESHing me... I was making a generic statement to the whole thread. I read all your posts clearly, and wasn't really addressing them, simply stating... well read Wylie's Mom's post, I'm tired of typing... lol..
__________________
~ Brit & Lights! Camera! Jackson! CGC ETD TKP ~
Follow Jackson on Instagram: https://instagram.com/jacksontheterrier
Britster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:38 AM   #238
♥ Maximo and Teddy
Donating Member
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 25,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximo View Post
I agree, but my take on how this thread progressed is different. I do not believe it is anyone's intention to attack or not allow different positions.
I see now that I was glossing over the parts about motive and bias. We all have a bias and wouldn't be human without it.

The talk of motives I did not interpret as a personal attack. I'm at a loss how to explain how I view it.
__________________
Kristin, Max and Teddy

Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:40 AM   #239
Resident Yorkie Nut Donating YT 20K Club Member
 
ladyjane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 27,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britster View Post


Ladyjane, I'm not sure why the long post SHEESHing me... I was making a generic statement to the whole thread. I read all your posts clearly, and wasn't really addressing them, simply stating... well read Wylie's Mom's post, I'm tired of typing... lol..
Your analogy made zero sense to me. Besides, why would you be bothered by others stating their opinions? You of all people? Your post indicated that they should not be doing it unless they "attacked" me as well. ?????
ladyjane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 08:43 AM   #240
YT 3000 Club Member
 
pstinard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Urbana, IL USA
Posts: 3,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane View Post
My position is that this discussion is not fact based; therefore it concerns me greatly in terms of what the overall good is for people who come to YT for information about altering their yorkies.
I agree that not all of the discussion is fact-based, and the title of this thread including the phrase "If ever" is unfortunate, since the "if ever" part is more a concern for some large breed dogs than for Yorkshire Terriers. For my part, I'm trying to keep my contributions as fact-based as possible. I found an excellent article on pros and cons of pediatric neutering (neutering dogs younger than 4 months of age) that I'm waiting to present when I have more time. It has a table that provides numerical scores to the risks and benefits so that the vet and owner can make a responsible decision as to when to neuter. For instance, the benefits of preventing mammary tumors and pyometra FAR outweigh the risk of obesity and CCL rupture in spayed females. However, the younger the dog, the greater the risk of spay incontinence (lack of bladder control), so it's best to spay the dog as late as possible before the first heat. Definitely the kind of discussion worth having.
pstinard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Google
 

SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167