![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Seems to me like there needs to be new thread started about white dogs or white and piebald genes. I thought this thread was about Partis, Not fortune telling on if or when a dog will be born blind or deaf. And now they are discussing horses??? Geeeesh there are blind and deaf dogs born in every breed, even cats and horses. |
Quote:
There is a test to determine if a horse carries the Lethal White gene, so many horse breeders who breed pintos will have their horses tested for the LWO (Lethal White Overo) gene or they will avoid breeding overo to overo all together. |
;) Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm concerned that egos are getting the way on this post just by how the posts are typed. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it. Is anyone a geneticist? Is anyone a direct decendent of Johann Mendel? Does anyone realize that a simple receptor from a gene being accepted can mess with the perfect STANDARD of the Yorkie? Do you realize that it can happen and it may have nothing to do with anything the breeder is doing? This receptor changes the trait and it will make it a recessie trait. The perfect yorkie now is soiled. *hanging head* This is a reality each time a bitch and sire are bred. We can educate ourselves as much as possible and hope that our knowledge and breeding practices work toward the good of the breed but believe it or not, some of us will miss. To wash ones hands that since they are not breeding they have no responsiblity, I disagree. People purchase them, just as people purchase dogs from pet shops. Both need breeders. Now, I'm not saying each breeder is the same but we have to step back and take check of what we are doing here and our responsibilities. The fact is, we are all here and we have something in common - we have a dog (98% of us). |
Quote:
And I said that we woll keep it in mind and watch for it. But it also might never happen. statistics show that the more you drive, the greater your chances of an accident. so are you going to quit driving because accidents CAN and DO happen. Or are you going to continue to drive taking as many precautions as possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess we won't know until we know. does ever breeder know for sure that none of their puppies are ever going to have problems as they get older. what about people, do they choose not have children because there is a chance that a child could become diabetic as it gets older? Maybe we all should quit messing with mother nature. There is a whole list of "What ifs" every morning when you choose to get out of bed. do you lie in bed because if you get up and go to work you might get into an accident and kill someones child. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We aren't going to stop breeding them as long as there is no indication of it happening, and even then we will most likely only stop breeding those lines. |
Quote:
So, what do we do from there? Breed within a responsible program and spay/neuter when it's neccessary...stop a line if we have to...then the chances are a lot less down the line. Right? |
1 Attachment(s) Quote:
According to the YTCA our partis are some sort of mutant anomaly that looks like this. Attachment 263616 |
Well, I have Biewers but we've all been tossed into the same pile. When I was younger we had Collies and German Shepherds...my sisters have had Goldens, Labs and Boxers...none of them have had health issues. I, on the other hand, have had Yorkies all of my adult life and we have spent a fortune in vet bills for life threatening health issues. Oh...and...my Yorkies were all of standard size and color. So, it's not just the partis and Biewers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There were too many posts for me to quote and reply so I'll just say this with apologies in advance to those that have posted civilly. What has been posted here about the piebald (parti) risks is factual. What has been posted to counter those facts are observations with no facts. If you had any facts, I think we would have seen them by now. While your observations may be true, so would mine be if I said that I've never seen any liver shunt or luxating patella in my dogs so it must not be a risk. Kinda ridiculous, huh? And no, I've not written a book :rolleyes: but that's the real kicker. I claim no expertise on the subject but was easily able to find tons of good, researched info that was apparently news to some of you that are actually breeding parti Yorkies. From what I've read, many of those breeding partis with other breeds are at least aware of the added risk and aren't in denial. This whole discussion could have ended if you had said something like, "Yes, we're aware of blah, blah, blah and are doing such and such to guard against it". Instead, what I see are flippant remarks and sarcasm. This never was about 'parti bashing'. I really don't have anything against partis and think they can probably be safely bred but not by those that won't even acknowledge the added risks associated with breeding them. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use