Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894695)

Bylaws are set in place to protect the breed. When I used the term traditional in my post it was only intended to address a question that you ignored. You seem to be more concerned with being combative. Let me add. There is no such thing as a traditional yorkie. There is no such thing as a parti colored yorkie. These are terms made up by unethical breeders.

I've posted the color requirements from the akc on here. You want to be treated equal just b/c a small group of people think something is okay to do?

People that buy these puppies should know the truth. People should not support breeders that are lying about a registration! I mean, what kind of breeder lies about the color they are breeding then registers it? Here it is in black and white from the akc.


Puppies are born black and tan and are normally darker in body color, showing an intermingling of black hair in the tan until they are matured. Color of hair on body and richness of tan on head and legs are of prime importance in adult dogs, to which the following color requirements apply: Blue: Is a dark steel-blue, not a silver-blue and not mingled with fawn, bronzy or black hairs. Tan: All tan hair is darker at the roots than in the middle, shading to still lighter tan at the tips. There should be no sooty or black hair intermingled with any of the tan.

Color on Body
The blue extends over the body from back of neck to root of tail. Hair on tail is a darker blue, especially at end of tail.

Headfall
A rich golden tan, deeper in color at sides of head, at ear roots and on the muzzle, with ears a deep rich tan. Tan color should not extend down on back of neck.

Chest and Legs
A bright, rich tan, not extending above the elbow on the forelegs nor above the stifle on the hind legs.

Weight
Must not exceed seven pounds.

Disqualifications:
Any solid color or combination of colors other than blue and tan as described above. Any white markings other than a small white spot on the forechest that does not exceed 1 inch at its longest dimension.

You will never be accepted in YTCA with a vagrants. Since when did YTCA allow a new standard because a member wanted one? You do not know what you are talking about. You aren't allowed membership so you bash the club? That should explain things about your intent about the breeds future. How much did you spend on research last year? You bad mouth the breed club yet you use it for marketing purposes by saying "some have a CH in their pedigree". I've read these posts, you say that MOST show homes are more concerned with finding the perfect show dog over health. They go hand in hand. Health is part of goal.

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894695)

Bylaws are set in place to protect the breed. When I used the term traditional in my post it was only intended to address a question that you ignored. You seem to be more concerned with being combative. Let me add. There is no such thing as a traditional yorkie. There is no such thing as a parti colored yorkie. These are terms made up by unethical breeders.



Weight
Must not exceed seven pounds.

Disqualifications:
Any solid color or combination of colors other than blue and tan as described above. Any white markings other than a small white spot on the forechest that does not exceed 1 inch at its longest dimension.

You will never be accepted in YTCA with a vagrants. Since when did YTCA allow a new standard because a member wanted one? You do not know what you are talking about. You aren't allowed membership so you bash the club? That should explain things about your intent about the breeds future. How much did you spend on research last year? You bad mouth the breed club yet you use it for marketing purposes by saying "some have a CH in their pedigree". I've read these posts, you say that MOST show homes are more concerned with finding the perfect show dog over health. They go hand in hand. Health is part of goal.

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894695)

Bylaws are set in place to protect the breed. When I used the term traditional in my post it was only intended to address a question that you ignored. You seem to be more concerned with being combative. Let me add. There is no such thing as a traditional yorkie. There is no such thing as a parti colored yorkie. These are terms made up by unethical breeders.

I've posted the color requirements from the akc on here. You want to be treated equal just b/c a small group of people think something is okay to do?

People that buy these puppies should know the truth. People should not support breeders that are lying about a registration! I mean, what kind of breeder lies about the color they are breeding then registers it? Here it is in black and white from the akc.


Puppies are born black and tan and are normally darker in body color, showing an intermingling of black hair in the tan until they are matured. Color of hair on body and richness of tan on head and legs are of prime importance in adult dogs, to which the following color requirements apply: Blue: Is a dark steel-blue, not a silver-blue and not mingled with fawn, bronzy or black hairs. Tan: All tan hair is darker at the roots than in the middle, shading to still lighter tan at the tips. There should be no sooty or black hair intermingled with any of the tan.

Color on Body
The blue extends over the body from back of neck to root of tail. Hair on tail is a darker blue, especially at end of tail.

Headfall
A rich golden tan, deeper in color at sides of head, at ear roots and on the muzzle, with ears a deep rich tan. Tan color should not extend down on back of neck.

Chest and Legs
A bright, rich tan, not extending above the elbow on the forelegs nor above the stifle on the hind legs.

Weight
Must not exceed seven pounds.

Disqualifications:
Any solid color or combination of colors other than blue and tan as described above. Any white markings other than a small white spot on the forechest that does not exceed 1 inch at its longest dimension.

You will never be accepted in YTCA with a vagrants. Since when did YTCA allow a new standard because a member wanted one? You do not know what you are talking about. You aren't allowed membership so you bash the club? That should explain things about your intent about the breeds future. How much did you spend on research last year? You bad mouth the breed club yet you use it for marketing purposes by saying "some have a CH in their pedigree". I've read these posts, you say that MOST show homes are more concerned with finding the perfect show dog over health. They go hand in hand. Health is part of goal.

Originally Posted by JeanieK (Post 2894755)

Just a few more things.

It was the show breeders themselves that stated that they put conformation over health or temperament.

The word parti was not made up by unethical breeders. It is a term that the AKC uses to describe dogs with wide spotting patterns. It is an official term.

People who buy these parti colored yorkies, do know the truth. the truth is posted right on my website. Unlike the show breeders who dhe their dogs and get them championed. do they tell the buyers, that they cheated to get the champion? that the dog is really not the correct color. hmmmmmmmm I doubt it.

You have posted nothing that is new or informative. It is all speculation and misinformation on your part.

Originally Posted by yorkiegirl2 (Post 2894767)

you do realize that you threw about 95 % of all breeders including show breeders under the bus with this statement.
Since the ytca changed the standard to dq all black /tan and the light blues .
Do you think these breeders who have spend thousand of dollars along with their blood, sweat and tears who championed these dogs, are now just going to stop breeding them because the ytca now considers them a color fault….not a chance.

Even if these dogs were once recognized but the parti were not, does not change the fact,.
These dogs are no longer correct in color…
so, tell me are you planning to jump on other posts and tell ethical breeders and show breeders they are now unethical because they are breeding a color faulted dog ????

Originally Posted by bjh (Post 2894783)

:confused:Where do you get this from? All the show exhibitors that I know that have posted on here always state that health comes first.

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894838)

I know many things. You cannot teach a pig to sing.

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894838)

Stop putting words in my mouth. Go read the dq again. It was changed to keep partis out.

I know many things. You cannot teach a pig to sing. Good luck.

Originally Posted by JeanieK (Post 2894849)

In this very thread.

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 2894838)

I know many things. You cannot teach a pig to sing.

Originally Posted by JeanieK (Post 2894849)

In this very thread.

Originally Posted by Pinehaven (Post 2894862)

Never say never! :2pig:

YouTube - The singing Pig

Originally Posted by Pinehaven (Post 2894862)

Never say never! :2pig:

YouTube - The singing Pig