|
Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us. |
|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
11-28-2010, 10:21 AM | #31 | ||
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 7,651
| Quote:
(1) No registration really ensures health or responsibly bred dogs. It does show that the breeder has certified these are the parents and the AKC keeps a record of the breeding. The health and breeding responsibility needs to be determined by getting to know the breeder and hopefully some vet record verification. Limited registration does not always refer to a difference in quality -- many times it is just to prevent breeding the dog. Even a well-conformed dog with a great history needs protection from being bred by an inexperienced breeder or worse later coming into the hands of a mill. (2) Of course we have heard of petstores & mills offering papers -- all the time. That is how we got all of the non-AKC registries in the first place. Many still use AKC. Plenty of YT members have AKC registered dogs that came from pet stores and puppymills. But most seem to wind up with ACA, APRI, CKC, etc... Millers started those registries. Quote:
__________________ FlDebra and her ABCs Annie, Ben, Candy Promoting Healthy Breeding to the AKC Yorkshire Terrier Standard | ||
Welcome Guest! | |
11-28-2010, 05:39 PM | #32 | |
Between♥Suspensions Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vaissades
Posts: 7,979
| Quote:
| |
11-28-2010, 05:56 PM | #33 | |
I ♥ Joey & Ralphie! Donating Member | Quote:
__________________ NancyJoey Proud members of the CrAzYcLuB and YAP! ** Just Say No to Puppymills – Join YAP! Yorkshire Terrier Club of America – Breeder Referrals | |
11-28-2010, 07:10 PM | #34 | |
Between♥Suspensions Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vaissades
Posts: 7,979
| Quote:
| |
11-28-2010, 07:27 PM | #35 | |
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 7,651
| Quote:
The litters are registered by the breeder and based on however many puppies the breeder reports were in the litter -- that is how many registration applications come to the breeder to be delivered to the buyer (if pups are sold). So, the litter would already be registered, regardless of whether or not the individual owners sent in their registration application. So, I don't think it would matter if the breeder encouraged registration or not. I don't see how it would relate to a breeder having more litters than reporting. She is still only going to have so many registration applications. She either gives each buyer one with their pup or doesn't. I see that the thread was started to question about a breeder selling a purebred puppy without registration at all. I do not see any benefit in them doing that. If the dog is a purebred, I too, think it should come with papers. If it does not come with papers, I have to assume there is a reason -- unknown parentage or something like that. But I can't see that they could use this to hide having additional litters. I suppose they could hold on to registration applications and then use them on a non-reported litter. But it would be easier to just say there were more pups in a litter than there were and get additional applications if they wanted to be crooked, low-down, rotten breeders. I just can't see selling a purebred puppy without a registration application for any reason other than there is something wrong with the breeding itself. But maybe my imagination is not working well enough tonight. What other reason would their be?
__________________ FlDebra and her ABCs Annie, Ben, Candy Promoting Healthy Breeding to the AKC Yorkshire Terrier Standard | |
11-28-2010, 07:37 PM | #36 | |
Mardelin Yorkshire Terriers Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: California
Posts: 14,776
| Quote:
FYI and not for you Debra. When a litter is registered with AKC, AKC returns papers on individual pups with the registration # and a number following it, i.e. TR123456/01, TR123456/02, etc. Now I've also heard of unscrupulous breeders having a couple of litters one not AKC and the other is....and registering the non AKC pups with the AKC pups.......So, if there is a pup in question, an owner can always go back to AKC and file a complaint.....DNA will be run on the litter.
__________________ Mardelin Yorkshire Terriers | |
11-28-2010, 07:51 PM | #37 | |
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 7,651
| Quote:
__________________ FlDebra and her ABCs Annie, Ben, Candy Promoting Healthy Breeding to the AKC Yorkshire Terrier Standard | |
11-28-2010, 08:03 PM | #38 | |
Mia, Max and Moe's Mom Donating Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,403
| Quote:
All she was doing was trying to join in the conversation. Yes she was making suggestions - but they were nice - unlike your comment! Last I checked - newbies were allowed to post - did that change? And she was not bullying - one of your first posts stated that you were "undecided" and she was just trying to make suggestions. Good grief!
__________________ Connie Mia Max Moe | |
11-28-2010, 08:16 PM | #39 | |
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Posts: 12,693
| Quote:
__________________ Littlest JakJak We miss you Kaji | |
11-28-2010, 08:59 PM | #40 | |
Between♥Suspensions Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vaissades
Posts: 7,979
| Quote:
| |
11-28-2010, 09:31 PM | #41 | |
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: FL
Posts: 7,651
| Quote:
As I tried to tell concrete girl (who has been a member since 8/09 -- not really a newbie!) -- it wasn't that she was making suggestions, it was that she just kept coming back at her time after time (4 times). That sort of goes a little beyond normal friendly suggestions. I know they tell used car salesmen to take 7 no's but that doesn't work on a Yorkie forum. Then there was the part about framing "papers" for a schorkie? (If a mixed breed is registered, then it is from a non-AKC registry which is not worth the paper it is written on. Registries that register mixed breeds are for profit and that is the root of their existance, plus they were started by puppymills and breeders that had been ousted from AKC. If I had a non-AKC registered dog, then I would not send in for the papers at all as I would think it much worse to contribute money to them than to be without the papers.) That can make some not want to continue a discussion right there. I think she was nice about it, she only said the other person's posts were making her not want to do it. That is nothing to get mad about for anyone. Now it would be good to get back to the subject the OP has tried to discuss.
__________________ FlDebra and her ABCs Annie, Ben, Candy Promoting Healthy Breeding to the AKC Yorkshire Terrier Standard Last edited by FlDebra; 11-28-2010 at 09:32 PM. | |
11-28-2010, 10:46 PM | #42 | |
Between♥Suspensions Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vaissades
Posts: 7,979
| Quote:
2. My SchNorkie isn't AKC registered(that's crazy!)-some registries are being created in Canada for "designer breeds"(showing the parents are purebred-but I'm not really into it just putting it out there for people's information). Scoob my Schnorkie, he's a rescue from a puppy mill dumping...his DNA papers are actually in a frame with his adoption papers, the pics of me picking him up as a puppy-my Miniature Schnauzer's papers (AKC) are framed in the pic of her with the breeding kennel and the pics of both her parents and their full AKC names etc (it's so cute)...I also have papers for my (AKC) dogs past...you seem to read a lot of my posts that aren't there. 3. I posted to her twice, I never 'kept coming back at her',(as you do me) I actually took the time to apologized to her after your post that I was bullying her and again after she commented that reading all my posts made her not want to register her dogs(which was just rude). I said I was sorry she took it the way she did (thinking I meant she couldn't afford it or whatever) and clarified how I meant my comment in which I quoted her and made a suggestion... 4. You, on the other hand, have actually posted directly to me on 4 different forums several times in each one pretty much just disagreeing with whatever I said-I'm not here to deal with arguing or conflict if you don't like what I say then that's your prerogative. Please quit attacking my posts, I'm not asking you to like me or agree with me, but the forums aren't for contradicting each other or other nonsense. 5.This forum is about registering dogs not your opinion of me, as with the training forum, and the dog rules forum and the other one you feel the need to reply to my posts on...let's all just get along and post relevant comments about the topic of the forum. Please stop posting about my comments going back and forth off the topic it's getting silly now. 6. Hope you have a happy holidays season, and we can all talk about the actual topics...oh I am "kinda" a new member I have been a member a short while but I haven't posted much until recently...hopefully this will be the last of any non-relevant or unfriendly communications | |
11-28-2010, 11:47 PM | #43 | |
Donating YT 2000 Club Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Posts: 12,693
| Quote:
If CJ25 took offense to that post, that's fine too. She just read more into it than was there. AKC papers are only as good as the breeder that stands behind them and their dogs. I simply don't value it at this point after all that has happened with my pup.
__________________ Littlest JakJak We miss you Kaji Last edited by DvlshAngel985; 11-28-2010 at 11:48 PM. | |
11-29-2010, 01:21 AM | #44 | |||
Mia, Max and Moe's Mom Donating Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,403
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Wow -- really? Just because she wrote that someone else's posts made her not want to do something, it made you MAD? You must have a time of it on here then, with all of the things that get posted over the course of a day or two. No Debra - not anymore. Sorry Lorraine - I'm in total agreement with you.
__________________ Connie Mia Max Moe | |||
11-29-2010, 08:37 AM | #45 |
I ♥ Joey & Ralphie! Donating Member | I just want to remind people that if you register you pup within the first year, it only costs $20.00, and that seems like a bargain to me. Lets not forget the AKC sponsors many good things, and it's the only American registry that does routine unannounced inspections of kennels. These inspections are costly, and the USDA says if a kennel is AKC registered, they basically drop all inspections, so it's left to the AKC to monitor some of these bigger kennels. I also would like to see more pet owners get involved with the AKC because pet owners, not just breeders, should have input into this organization. I know many people complain that they don't like some of its policies, but if pet owners were more involved, perhaps, they would have more of a voice. There are more pet owners than breeders and collectively they could have a very large voice. I believe that pet owners and good breeders want basically the same things.
__________________ NancyJoey Proud members of the CrAzYcLuB and YAP! ** Just Say No to Puppymills – Join YAP! Yorkshire Terrier Club of America – Breeder Referrals |
Bookmarks |
|
|
| |
|
|
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart