Parti confussion?????

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by avasmama75

UGH So much anger sometimes

YES. Insulting juvenile comments like the one you were referencing don't even deserve a response. Even those of us that are debating are more respectful of each other than ( "r u slow". )

[Nancy1999]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

I was asking the question after reading post #70. Yorkiekist made it very clear thast spay/neutering was the only reputable thing to do if one produced a parti puppy. So I thought my question was a reasonable one.

I in no way suggested that the parti color was a worse fault, why would I do that? I don't consider it a fualt at all, I consider it a variation.

Yorkiekist said that this is what she would do, she didn't say it was the only reputable thing to do, but she would know more about which traits are considered more serious flaws. She also said that she would tell others about the fault. You are the one from whom I learned that breeders want to keep this a huge secret, before that I didn't think it was any worse than any other fault. Speaking of secrets, I do hope the Parti breeders will share their knowledge if a trait such as deafness is found in their offspring, and they will inform others about this too. Deafness and the recessive trait has been linked in some dogs, but you are correct there are those breeders who would keep this quite because they didn't want to destroy their line.

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by Nancy1999

Yorkiekist said that this is what she would do, she didn't say it was the only reputable thing to do, but she would know more about which traits are considered more serious flaws. She also said that she would tell others about the fault. You are the one from whom I learned that breeders want to keep this a huge secret, before that I didn't think it was any worse than any other fault. Speaking of secrets, I do hope the Parti breeders will share their knowledge if a trait such as deafness is found in their offspring, and they will inform others about this too. Deafness and the recessive trait has been linked in some dogs, but you are correct there are those breeders who would keep this quite because they didn't want to destroy their line.

I do not believe any breeder would continue to breed a dog that was producing offspring with health issues. Now there might be some that do, but I know nothing about that.

I know for a fact that breeders kept the color issue a secret and that is how the gene stayed alive. T he parti gene is what is being discussed here that is why I focused on that one.

Yorkiekist's post stated that she would do that and I responded with a question, asking if she would do this with any fault or just the parti color fault. she as yet to reply to that question.

You responded with surprise that I would even ask that question. After her statement why is the question so surprising. it's a legitimate question to someone who would spay/neuter for a fault that is not a health issue.

[hugz4all4]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

YES. Insulting juvenile comments like the one you were referencing don't even deserve a response. Even those of us that are debating are more respectful of each other than ( "r u slow". )

That comment was meant for me, I wasnt going to stoop to thier level but I had too, I couldnt let something like that go, to call me slow (esp. when they wrote it like that ) when I was replying to a question was just rude. Not to mention in a later post she/he replied something about being done with this thread cause they were being critcized??? It was alright when they did though

This thread has been very informative and I appreciate everyone that has put effort into proving thier sides, not to mention for the most part you all have respected each other.

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

That comment was meant for me, I wasnt going to stoop to thier level but I had too, I couldnt let something like that go, to call me slow (esp. when they wrote it like that ) when I was replying to a question was just rude. Not to mention in a later post she/he replied something about being done with this thread cause they were being critcized??? It was alright when they did though

This thread has been very informative and I appreciate everyone that has put effort into proving thier sides, not to mention for the most part you all have respected each other.

It is difficult to ignore those types of comments, and believe me I have let myself drop to their level many times. Her last two posts on here indicate that she is approximately 13. Not really even worth your time getting upset over. Just consider the source.

Sorry you had to experience the ugly side of forums.

[hugz4all4]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

It is difficult to ignore those types of comments, and believe me I have let myself drop to their level many times. Her last two posts on here indicate that she is approximately 13. Not really even worth your time getting upset over. Just consider the source.

Sorry you had to experience the ugly side of forums.

I didnt relize that she was only 13 now it all makes since. Thank you.

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

I didnt relize that she was only 13 now it all makes since. Thank you.

LOL Not sure how old she is, but her comments are consistent with the mentality of 13 year old.

[phfgkl]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

LOL Not sure how old she is, but her comments are consistent with the mentality of 13 year old.

LOL Which one are you talking about? I don't want to have to read back through all the pages of this to find out who said that

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by phfgkl

LOL Which one are you talking about? I don't want to have to read back through all the pages of this to find out who said that

The OP. but you can't find her comments because they have been deleted. Refer to post #89.

[hugz4all4]

I dont know how to multiple quote but its all mostly on the first page. She made a comment about partis' being nothing but Mutts,
I replied back to her about the yorkie once being a mutt too, she replied back saying pretty much that I was "slow" I commented back, she later commented that she had gotten all the info she needed and her original question was answered and that she was leaving the thread because of the negative comments.. She could dish them out but not take' em.

[hugz4all4]

Originally Posted by Myslaydee

Thank you but i would think there is more to a dog than just it being beautiful!!!! I mean now i understand its not a breed more of a mixed what that call a "mut"!! Not cool to me how desperate people are to make money thank you

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

and apparently you didnt read all of pinehaven's posts
ALL PUREBREDs except for the maltese are mixed with something.. so yeah your beautiful yorkie was once considered a "Mutt"..

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

yeah Im slow this coming from someone who can't even write in full sentences.
You asked a question and it got answered. Enjoy your standard yorkie Im sure its beautiful!!

Here is some one the converstation, the comment about me being slow isnt there but thats the gist of it.

[hugz4all4]

Originally Posted by JeanieK

LOL Not sure how old she is, but her comments are consistent with the mentality of 13 year old.

OH.. oops and I agree with you

[JeanieK]

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

OH.. oops and I agree with you

Some of her juvenile comments were deleted.

[phfgkl]

Originally Posted by hugz4all4

I dont know how to multiple quote but its all mostly on the first page. She made a comment about partis' being nothing but Mutts,
I replied back to her about the yorkie once being a mutt too, she replied back saying pretty much that I was "slow" I commented back, she later commented that she had gotten all the info she needed and her original question was answered and that she was leaving the thread because of the negative comments.. She could dish them out but not take' em.

I do remember seeing that, but, guess that's why it was gone when I went back to find it and just skimmed through the pages. I remembered reading that, but, didn't remember who had posted it

[TammyJM]

Originally Posted by Nancy1999

Yorkiekist said that this is what she would do, she didn't say it was the only reputable thing to do, but she would know more about which traits are considered more serious flaws. She also said that she would tell others about the fault. You are the one from whom I learned that breeders want to keep this a huge secret, before that I didn't think it was any worse than any other fault. Speaking of secrets, I do hope the Parti breeders will share their knowledge if a trait such as deafness is found in their offspring, and they will inform others about this too. Deafness and the recessive trait has been linked in some dogs, but you are correct there are those breeders who would keep this quite because they didn't want to destroy their line.

What dog are you referring to?? Your statement of, "Deafness and the recessive trait has been linked in some dogs", is quite broad and seems that you are trying to imply that there is a link with the tri-colored Yorkie and deafness.