I need help from YT members

[Lil Sis]

My 2 cent is... The manager was rude. Yes I will write to complain. I think the op was treated poorly so she, as we all would do, wanted to get back.


I would buy from a store again if I was treated rude... And word of month is the best tool to uses

I do not see anything wrong in binging dogs into places that allow it, I would much rather see a pup than a mis behaved child, I have had many meals ruined by children that the parents do not control their child. When my children were little there were restaurants who would not allow children. I was. Little miffed but understood. The same is true foe my dog, as long as I understand or know the rules I will follow. But treat me with respect.

[dawn27]

I believe that the manager need to learn how to deal with customers in a more professional way...

But... I also believe that animals (other than service animals) have no place being in any store for any reason. With the exception of pet stores who allow it. It's just not right... sign or no sign.

WHen I saw that our town was getting a Pet Supplies Plus Pet Store I was very excited, we go a few times a year with the dogs.

[chachi]

Originally Posted by Taryn0405

Yeah this is blowing way out of proportion...

The post went from being upset with Blockbuster due to the manager's lack of social and management skills to debating whether or not emotional needs for a dog is ethical in regards to bringing a dog into a store with them.

I love bringing my dog in stores with me, but if I'm asked to get out, I get out. I don't boycott the store necessarily,but Gizmo is ususally with me when I go somewhere so I won't be returning anytime soon. Woop-de-frickin-do.

I don't think anyone on this thread is finding a "loophole" with regards to service dogs. Do I think there are people out there that do take advantage of it? Absolutely! But sadly we do live in a world of liars and a-holes that have a tendency to ruin it for everyone else. Once again, woop-de-frickin-do.

The joy of posting on a public thread is there are many times you don't agree with what someone said. But, whatever that's the joy of an opinion. But geez talk about straying away from the original topic and blowing something way out of proportion.

This topic has been discussed both onh this thread and in past thread alot nausiating alot so there are a group of people that do feel both ways. If someone doesnt frequent a business that wont let their dog in that is fine but5 that is different than this case where someone wants to affect their business and encourage others to do it also. I do think the store should have been more professional but I still dont think thats cause to start a boycott and I dont really believe that is the reasoning for it either.

[Barney's mom]

I understand your frustration, but many people have children that have allergies to dogs and some bad pet owners allow their pets to urinate in the stores. Also some people are afraid of dogs. I agree with the store. Just don't take your pet in stores that don't want pets.

[concretegurl]

(just playing devil's advocate here)

Uhhhh dog's fly on airplanes (an enclosed space with only recirculated air) and the airlines say TOO BAD about those with allergies because (some study somewhere it was said) being in direct contact with a person covered in dog allergens is just as detrimental as being in direct contact with the dog...so the allergies thing is kind of mute in reality...

I'm odd on this one I;m not allergic to dog neither are my children but non-hypoallergenic dogs (the breeds with heavy dander) freak out our allergies so several family members mock me bringing my dogs places with me or just having them and then saying we can't go to their houses unless we've taken allergy meds prior...

[dawn27]

Originally Posted by chachi

This topic has been discussed both onh this thread and in past thread alot nausiating alot so there are a group of people that do feel both ways. If someone doesnt frequent a business that wont let their dog in that is fine but5 that is different than this case where someone wants to affect their business and encourage others to do it also. I do think the store should have been more professional but I still dont think thats cause to start a boycott and I dont really believe that is the reasoning for it either.

I agree 100% ....

I think that to encourage others to boycott a business just because you cant take your pooch in their store or because the manager was load and unprofessional is taking it way out of proportion !

[yorkietalkjilly]

We can try to understand that many people like to conduct business without people bringing in their wild and jumping dogs and therefore to be fair, have to outlaw all dogs. I, for one, would not go into a business that has dogs in it if the dogs aren't in carriers or in the arms of the owner. I have a very bad back and just the slightest jumping up on my legs by even a midsize dog can cause 2 days of misery - and I love dogs! I live and breathe dogs! But I prefer to keep away from stores that welcome them as so many people simply cannot control their own pets! And some don't even keep them clean! Ugh! Don't encourage hurting someone's earning a living because they are trying to keep it civil for all. But they should be nice about it when explaining their rules as we should about accepting them or personally going elsewhere.

[My lil friend]

Originally Posted by dawn27

I agree 100% ....

I think that to encourage others to boycott a business just because you cant take your pooch in their store or because the manager was load and unprofessional is taking it way out of proportion !

The OP didnt ask for an over all boycott. I will not return to the store and sense it happened to ME. I will choose for ME. I did ask "if you were so inclined" to write BB and tell them how you felt. I have even stated that you can write in support of BB.

[concretegurl]

Originally Posted by My lil friend

The OP didnt ask for an over all boycott. I will not return to the store and sense it happened to ME. I will choose for ME. I did ask "if you were so inclined" to write BB and tell them how you felt. I have even stated that you can write in support of BB.

Emailing their customer service asking for consistency so customers aren't put on the spot and noting how many people feel very strongly about their dogs being like children and sensitivity and basic rules of customer service and politeness when "informing" customers of the policy...

[Sweetlips6]

Originally Posted by chachi

Why does your dog need to be able to go in the blockbuster store can you tell me? Can you tell me one reason besides its convenient for you because there are other paying customers there some IM sure that have allergies to animals and its not convenient to them so what makes your needs more important than theirs. Yes a candy bar isnt open food but it is consumed by humans so it is considered a food item. How do you know someone else may bring a dog and it chew on a candy bar. When these places make rules they have to make them for everyone. It is unfair for you to take out your frustrations towards blockbuster and try to affect them financially. You chose to have a dog it is your responsibility not blockbusters be responsible and respectful

I have to agree. I love Bonnie to death, but I am respectful of others. I realize my baby does not belong some places.
Lets face it, your dog did not want to go to Blockbusters, you wanted to take her there. Also, just because they are little and cute is not fair to someone that loves their huge dog. They want their big dog with them too. Where do you draw the line?

[My lil friend]

Excuse me,but you werent there when I put a harness on my dog and walked out the door with her. She begs to go with me everytime I leave the house. Loves the car,loves the people and loves everywhere she goes. The issue is that the rules had changed sense my last visit and I was yelled at. If the rules had not changed then there would not of been a problem.
Do NOT presume to know,this is not an opinion but a presumption that my dog may not enjoy going. Also I own a 70lb dog and although I would love to take him places he actually does not enjoy outing and therefore does stay home.
I draw the line at restaurants,although there is one here that my dog is welcome. Actually invited by the owners to visit anytime that she wishes.I draw the line at grocery stores because they have open food in the way of meats and vegetables.
If you are going to respond then give your opinion not a presumption that you have knowledge that you do not have. If your opinion is that dogs should not go to public places,then just state that. Dont presume.

[Sweetlips6]

Originally Posted by DvlshAngel985

I agree about it being an informal policy. My CU has a clear sign that says "no pets allowed" on the door. They let me in with Kaji when I opened my account and every time after. My older brother has seen a well behaved golden retriever in the bank. It's an informal policy, and when a misbehaved dog walks in, they can politely point to the door and ask them to leave.

Not trying to start anything, just asking,
If the sign says "no pets allowed" why did you even bring your dog in? Doesn't that open you up to having you feelings hurt if they ask you to leave? Think the sign doesn't mean your dog? I am amazed at those that think the rules are for others to follow, but not for them.

[My lil friend]

First the sign was NEW, I had been in that store more than once a month for more than 5 years,with NO problem. Second the sign did NOT say "no pets allowed" it said "service animals welcome" and I didn't see it because it was NEW. The service animal posting usually gives the manager lea way,instead she chose to yell at me to inform me that I could no longer bring my dog in.
As for my feelings,they are not injured. You were being presumptious not giving your opinion.

[mscat]

Originally Posted by Dolcesmama_xoxo

2. Q: What is a service animal?

A: The ADA defines a service animal as any guide dog, signal dog, or other animal individually trained to provide assistance to an individual with a disability. If they meet this definition, animals are considered service animals under the ADA regardless of whether they have been licensed or certified by a state or local government.



I am not in any way trying to find a "loophole" for the ADA. I have a disability which does not allow me to go places with crowds of people. Im not talking crowds like at a concert. Im talking crowds like at the grocery store. Like I stated before, I have anxiety/panic disorder to a degree where if I'm in "crowds" of people I hyperventilate and my hands cramp up where I can't even get to my medication in my purse. I have trained Dolce to get my medication which is in a pouch that she can grab for me. She is also the only thing that can calm me down enough while I wait for my medication to kick in. Anyway, I was only letting the poster know about these laws because I didn't even know about them myself until I started researching about them when my illness started to spiral out of control recently. I don't know anything about the poster other than they have a yorkie. They, and possible other people that post her on YT, might find the information useful if they are like me in any way. I'm in no way asking people to look for a loophole or break the law. I'm sorry that people took it that way. I didn't think I would need to explain myself and my situation to people, because I didnt think people would judge. Like I said before, the service dog would need to perform 3 tasks that you can look up a list for, and if the dog doesn't perform those tasks (which all have to do with helping a disabled person) then they don't qualify. *sigh* anyway, now i regret ever posting on this thread because it has just become a headache for me. I was just trying to explain some useful information for any people that it would benefit.

I am curioius?
Did a DR. ever tell you that you were disabled? Tell you that a service dog would be benefical to you because your condition is so severe that you are not able to leave home without the extra support?
Are you currently collecting disability benefits? I ask you these questions because just deciding yourself that your disabled is not enough . It takes more then a dog who can perform a couple of things to be consdered a "service animal" PLus, physically or mentally , a Dr. has to agree that you are disabled and a service dog is needed . If not then YES, you are abusing the ADA .
I actually have a variety of illness's , and are 100% disabled, unable to work . My Dr. did agree a service dog would be beneficial for myself . I also have a son with autism and cognitive delays.
We have 2 small service dogs. Evenso I do not bring them with me all the time. Despite having difficulties when going out, I prefer the help of a family member. I have my hands full already then to bring a dog into the picture.
I could if i wanted to easily though.
As far as the OP , Yes I agree that management needed to handle this with a lot more professionalism . However, I do not think that it is ok for a pet owner to think that they can bring a dog into a store just because they have done it before many times without nobody questioning it. I think it was a matter of time that someone said something.
The OP could of responded with a little more grace, and just left the store. Most places do not allow dogs into their store. Not in the United States.

[concretegurl]

Ever wonder why stores ask you to leave if you have your dog?
Shouldn't they ask you to please take you dog out?... and please come back...just without your dog?