Quote:
Originally Posted by Taryn0405  Yeah this is blowing way out of proportion...
The post went from being upset with Blockbuster due to the manager's lack of social and management skills to debating whether or not emotional needs for a dog is ethical in regards to bringing a dog into a store with them.
I love bringing my dog in stores with me, but if I'm asked to get out, I get out. I don't boycott the store necessarily,but Gizmo is ususally with me when I go somewhere so I won't be returning anytime soon. Woop-de-frickin-do.
I don't think anyone on this thread is finding a "loophole" with regards to service dogs. Do I think there are people out there that do take advantage of it? Absolutely! But sadly we do live in a world of liars and a-holes that have a tendency to ruin it for everyone else. Once again, woop-de-frickin-do.
The joy of posting on a public thread is there are many times you don't agree with what someone said. But, whatever that's the joy of an opinion. But geez talk about straying away from the original topic and blowing something way out of proportion. |
This topic has been discussed both onh this thread and in past thread alot nausiating alot so there are a group of people that do feel both ways. If someone doesnt frequent a business that wont let their dog in that is fine but5 that is different than this case where someone wants to affect their business and encourage others to do it also. I do think the store should have been more professional but I still dont think thats cause to start a boycott and I dont really believe that is the reasoning for it either.