![]() |
Quote:
so its very amatuer.. im sure you are the only visitor i have had notice i did not call them morkiepoobiewers:eek: i thought sadie was pregnant.. but thanks for reminding me to change that to spring of 2009 for the morkipoos:cool: i dont know too many morkipoos.. but hoping for them someday...:p youre pretty good with your detective work...:) thanks for letting me confuse you a little:) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I commend you for your knowledge and willingness to share. Your posts always show that you have researched and studied, and I always enjoy reading your contributions! |
Quote:
|
trying to fix my website Quote:
i have to plead temporary insanity after gus gus incident:animal-pa the godaddy website is not loading right now that is confusing.. websight tonight.. too slow... gotta fix the gus info.. poor gus gus:aimeeyork |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd love to see one. |
Quote:
Sorry for getting on the defensive. After that last controversial thread I'm a little shell shocked. LOL :p but I have also noticed that others have gained from the threads and are now more knowledgeable, so evidently I'm not the only one who is doing their homework. We have a long way to go with the partis, just don't want to have to trip over the mess left behind by the Biewer people. and that is not an attack on anyone, just referring to all the confusion caused by the different theories being thrown around. Pick your story and stick to it. We all no that at this point that there is no proof of anything regarding the history of the parti colored yorkies. But if you are trying to prove a point, you can't keep changing sides. |
Quote:
Splitter is the term used when it's a breeding between a biewer and a yorkie. while carrier is the word used for puppies from a parti and standard color breeding. |
Quote:
Since a biewer has been established as a breed of their own, isn't breeding a "splitter" producing a mixed breed? I now reside in the State of Confusion with Bamafan. please explain. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know BBCI position has always been biewer to biewer breedings and this position has been adopted by the BTCA too. Several things you've quoted are specifically from the BTCA. What one club "believes" is not necessarily across the board of ALL biewer clubs... |
Quote:
Again, this goes back to "who you ask" regarding the dogs having been established as a breed of their own. (AKC has yet to declare that.) They have definately been divided (for lack of better word) from the Yorkies. Some people only breed Biewer to Biewer. Some still integrate Yorkies (on rare occasions) back into the breed to add back into the color. When a Biewer is bred to a standard colored Yorkie, the litter is referred to as a 'splitter litter'--some may be standard colored, some may have the tri-Biewer coloring. A standard colored offspring is referred to as a 'splitter'--if bred to a standard Yorkie, will produce standard colored offspring, when bred to a Biewer, will create Biewer offspring. (But of course, the theory that the dogs are not the result of Yorkies afterall further complicates that, I suppose.) I *think* I got that right. |
Quote:
Breeding a splitter to a biewer does NOT always result in biewer colored puppies. Now we're back to the pie bald gene discussion...this thread has come full circle. :rolleyes: The biewer only has the recessive gene to offer...a splitter has both the recessive and the dominant gene to offer. So you can get biewer colored AND standard coloring within the same litter. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use