![]()  |   
|   | 
| 
				Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers.  You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us.  |  
 
  |  |||||||
![]()  |  
|   |  LinkBack | Thread Tools | 
|    |  #61 | 
|    YT 1000 Club Member   Join Date: May 2007  Location: Ohio  
					Posts: 1,079
				   |      Sorry should have said some was copied, some was added, and parts re-arranged.     |  
|   |  
|  Welcome Guest!  |    |  
|    |  #62 | 
|    Yorkie Talker  Join Date: Nov 2007  Location: st louis  
					Posts: 10
				   |      Here is a excerpt from an article on the YTCA website :    “Yorkshire Terriers were given their breed name by 1874, although it had been around since 1870. Originally they were known and shown as Broken Haired Scotch Terriers or Toy Terrier (rough and broken haired). Almost all of the classes were divided by weight. The classes were for Broken Haired or Rough Scotch Terriers less than 5 lbs. or 6 lbs. and under; Toy Terriers 4 lbs. and under, or 5 lbs. not exceeding 7 lbs., or 6 lbs. and over; or Blue Scotch Terriers under 7 lbs. or 7 lbs. not exceeding 9 lbs. The largest weight class in which they were reported to have been shown was for Broken Haired Scotch Terrier 9 lbs. not exceeding 12 lbs. This record should prove that although there were larger Yorkshires they were not being shown at the dog shows. The record proves that the small size was available for breeding from early days.” I know from my experience and a few other knowledgeable breeders that we can consistently produce healthy yorkies under 4 lbs.(not just an occasional small puppy). The reason we can do this is because we understand genetics, study the pedigrees of our yorkies, and the fact that small genetics already exists in the Yorkshire Terrier which is proven in the article on the YTCA website. Attached is a picture of a 3 month old puppy of ours. ![]() She came from a litter of four, 3 of the puppies will probably never make it to 2 lbs. And the fourth puppy may make it to 3 lbs. Not only are they all small but two of them (if they were larger) could be considered as show quality. I have two questions: 1. Why is a breeder who breeds for small Yorkies not reputable? 2. If you breed for small yorkies how would you ethically describe your yorkies?  |  
|   |  
|    |  #63 | |
|    Donating YT 10K Club Member   Join Date: Oct 2005  Location: Alabama  
					Posts: 11,432
				   |     Quote:  
 *Generally*, when you run across breeders purposely breeding for extremely small Yorkies, it's not because they are trying to breed for quality dogs--it's because they are trying to get big $$$ of a designer fad. (Thanks Paris and Brittney!   )As with any dogs who are bred without their best interest--health, temperament, standard--in mind, they run a greater risk of health problems due to bad breeding. Even the healthiest of tiny Yorkies are still more prone to injury. That is just a fact. Unfortunate, but a fact just the same. They cannot physically handle the same things that the non-tiny Yorkies can. And what is the point? What is the benefit of having a dog that requires so much extra care and caution? When you are charging outrageous prices for dogs that you advertise and promote because of their incredibly large size, it's going to be hard to convince anyone that you are eithical. I realize everyone has a right to charge what they feel like their dogs are worth, but there comes a time when you cross the line and it becomes ridiculous. Just general thoughts...  |  |
|   |  
|    |  #64 | 
|    Donating YT 1000 Club Member   Join Date: Oct 2006  Location: Texas  
					Posts: 4,280
				   |      And my question is why breed for that small anyway?  I would rather have a yorkie within standard and bred correctly and not have to worry if my little one is going to hurt themselves and worry and worry and worry....I have a yorkie that is right at 4 pounds and she's the one I worry about the most...the bigger ones just seem to be a lot less worry....everytime Krissy the 4 pounds one jumps I freak and when she gets under foot I freak and with  concrete flooring I worry about her...she's healthy yes but I'd much rather have the larger yorkie and besides I show and she's my pet but to breed responsibly you breed a bigger yorkie not the ones that are tiny UGH!      Donna Bird Brooklynn's Yorkshire Terriers  |  
|   |  
|    |  #65 | |
|    BANNED!   Join Date: Aug 2005  Location: Kentucky  
					Posts: 9,248
				   |     Quote:  
     Don't bother to reply.  i am at the library for a few minutes.  The big dell crashed.   |  |
|   |  
|    |  #66 | |
|    Donating YT 10K Club Member   Join Date: Oct 2005  Location: Alabama  
					Posts: 11,432
				   |     Quote:  
       If it's him, that would explain the defense of tiny breeders.... Is it the same pup, Dee? Last edited by BamaFan121s; 01-02-2008 at 09:49 AM.  |  |
|   |  
|    |  #67 | 
|    Yorkie Talker  Join Date: Nov 2007  Location: st louis  
					Posts: 10
				   |      You are right in saying that the small dogs are more prone to injury. That I would say is an accurate fact. But if I breed Borzoi’s as an example then any breed that is smaller people should not buy because they are smaller and more prone to injury.   As with just about anything in life there are pros and cons. A small dog being prone to injury is a definite con. But you don’t seem to realize that there are many pros to the smaller yorkies. When we sell the very small yorkies we try and educate the people on the cons of the small yorkies, and there are some cons that you probably are unaware of yourself. With this knowledge customers are able to make more informed decisions. In some cases the people decide that the really small yorkies isn’t really best for them and decide on a little bigger yorkies. Then there are other times that even knowing the cons of the small yorkies to them the pros out weight the cons. Our job as breeders is to educate our customers with factual information that can help them make better decisions and we do a much better job than most. As far as pricing I have never seen a post complaining about a show breeder charging $12,000.00 for a yorkie. Or about many show breeders getting 3000.00 – 5000.00 for a puppy. Why is that ? No one has answered my question Why is a breeder who breeds for small Yorkies not reputable? Or why are you not a responsible breeder if you don’t breed bigger yorkies?  |  
|   |  
|    |  #68 | |
|    Mardelin Yorkshire Terriers   Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2006  Location: California  
					Posts: 14,776
				   |     Quote:  
 I so understand what you mean. Charmer though 5 pounds is very diminutive and fine boned ( his paw pads are much smaller than the size of quarter). I worry about him constantly. I do prefer a yorkie with more bone on them. My Grandson has one of Lee's pups out of her Andy and this boy is great....nice strong boned and I can rough house with him and not worry. Bigger than standard, yes, but I love his size for a pet. 
				__________________   Mardelin  Yorkshire Terriers   |  |
|   |  
|    |  #69 | |
|    Mardelin Yorkshire Terriers   Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2006  Location: California  
					Posts: 14,776
				   |     Quote:  
 
				__________________   Mardelin  Yorkshire Terriers   |  |
|   |  
|    |  #70 | |
|    Princess Poop A Lot   Donating Member Join Date: Nov 2005  Location: Colorado  
					Posts: 6,728
				   |     Quote:  
 
				__________________   Cindy & The Rescued Gang   Puppies Are Not Products!  |  |
|   |  
|    |  #71 | |
|    Senior Yorkie Talker  Join Date: May 2005  
					Posts: 216
				   |     Quote:  
 I am a show breeder and I have never seen a show breeder charge 12000.00 for a dog. Jeff Dane, yes, but not a show breeder. I would sure like to know where you seen that at. Even your 3000.00 - 5000.00 is out of line for a pet. Some of the really good show dogs that have already finished their championship, yes, but not a pet. 1000 to 2000 for a pet just pays for the care from birth to selling age for most of us. I have a single pup right now that was just born 12/28 and it has already cost me over 1000.00 to have my bitch checked, and monitored because they knew it was a singleton pup and would be too large for her to whelp freely. I still have puppy shots, worming, microchipping, and general caring for her. If, I was to sell her as a pet, she would go at 1200.00, which is what I sell all my pets for regardless of size. Even my tiny went at only 1000.00 because I cared more about the home she was going to than making money. None of us breed for the tiny yorkies, but we still occasionaly have them, just as we occasionaly have a larger than standard one. The reason we say that those that breed for the tinies are not reputable is because they are usually in it for the money and are putting the little bitches that they use at risk. I worry about my bitches that are 4 1/2 to 6 pounds, I could not imagine breeding anything smaller without worring about her dying. Also, not only are the tinies bones more easily broken, but if they get sick, they do not have any reserve weight to help them through the illness, they MUST be taken to a vet immediately and treated, which a lot of people do not understand. What we may usually wait a day or two for, before getting treatment on a standard yorkie, could end up killing a tiny that did not get treated. If you like a particular breed, then you should be breeding to the standard for that breed Last edited by Baron; 01-02-2008 at 10:18 AM.  |  |
|   |  
|    |  #72 | |||
|    Donating YT 10K Club Member   Join Date: Oct 2005  Location: Alabama  
					Posts: 11,432
				   |      Quote:  
   Quote:  
 Quote:  
 Even 3000.00 would be pushing it. But at least when buying a dog from a reputable show breeder for a higher amount, you know that they are being judge on how well their dogs are representing the breed, which is why they are more...even show breeders have to cover their costs. More costs, time and money will naturally be put into a breeding program where the breeder is actively showing. What is the excuse for charging that price for a dog just because it's smaller. Yes, your question has been answered and opinions have been given. If they were not to your liking and you choose to ignore them...that is your choice.  |  |||
|   |  
|    |  #73 | 
|    Yorkie Talker  Join Date: Nov 2007  Location: st louis  
					Posts: 10
				   |      Here is just one example.   http://rondelkennels.com/nursery.html Personally what someone charges is really only their buisness and people charging high prices actually benefits all breeders. If everyone sold their yorkies for $350.00 you would have a hard time selling yours for $1000.00  |  
|   |  
|    |  #74 | |
|    Mardelin Yorkshire Terriers   Donating Member Join Date: Aug 2006  Location: California  
					Posts: 14,776
				   |     Quote:  
   
				__________________   Mardelin  Yorkshire Terriers   |  |
|   |  
|    |  #75 | 
|    Donating YT 4000 Club Member   Join Date: Jan 2005  Location: Portland Oregon  
					Posts: 4,405
				   |      I think there is a bottom line for NOT breeding the t$n$es, we all know the rIsks and they are huge BUT...    Breeding for structure is what all well bred dogs are about! A tiny has no structure...they are fragile, they have NO girth..most often than not because of their frail structure theyre roached backed, many have under or over shot bits, many have an over crowded mouth, many can not safely be around small children, many can not safely be around other dogs (specially large ones) many MUST be fed several times a day, many have open fontanals that never close, many suffer from hypglocemia, many will suffer from LP's at an early age (from jumping injuries), if bred often requires a c-section and the cycle is repeated and repeated and repeated... WHY in the world would a person purposely breed for all of the above, BECAUSE THEY CAN...a PET BREEDER breeds for t$n$es without a conscience, they profess they love the$r bab$es and they give them so much joy, what about the heartache theyre sell$ng? what about the added expense these puppy buyers are not $nformed about! Perhaps these breeders should also give a lifetime guarantee and PAY for all of the added expense needed to care for these prec$ous little accessor$es! All I see is heartache and $$$$ signs. 
				__________________    Kimberly   Last edited by feminvstr; 01-02-2008 at 10:42 AM.  |  
|   |  
![]()  |  
| Bookmarks | 
|   | 
|   | 
 
  |    |  
|   | 
|   | 
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart