Parti Color? YTCA? - Page 4 - YorkieTalk.com Forums

Rhetts_mama · 09-01-2010, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brooklynn

I don't think I've seen a parti poodle LOL, not to make light of it but I'm sure they would have a problem with that variation too IMHO.

Donna

Examples of parti's in doxies and poodles. In the doxies, they are called piebalds. There's no description of it in the AKC standards, but they are recognized on the registration papers. I'm not sure about the poodles.

Breezeaway · 09-01-2010, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brooklynn

Well first of all I would register the litter if it threw a parti but it would be spayed or neutered and then the parents as well. I don't breed for parti's nor would I "KILL" "CULL" as you call it, any healthy living, breathing animal just because of color!
I'm sorry but as I see what's being posted is just trying to justify breeding off colors to please the public hence the words supply and demand. You can't show them so therefore your doing it for the pet population. I, on the other hand do it for the love of the breed and breed standard and the show ring for "myself" not the pet or showing population. I've stated before I don't even sell show dogs and if I have a pet amongst my litter when I have one it goes spayed or neutered to a loving pet home. If it's of show quality and I don't need it because I have enough "again" it will be spayed and neutered and placed into a loving pet home!

Donna

What I don't understand is why would you register it then?
If you are a to the standard kind of person, I don't understand why you would go ahead and register , whats the point? Double standard?

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

What I don't understand is why would you register it then?
If you are a to the standard kind of person, I don't understand why you would go ahead and register , whats the point? Double standard?

Because I register the litter? It would be up to the new owner whether or not to register the individual pup. I don't see it as a double standard.

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

What I don't understand is why would you register it then?
If you are a to the standard kind of person, I don't understand why you would go ahead and register , whats the point? Double standard?

Because I register the litter I breed? It would be up to the person to register the individual pup. I don't see a double standard...

Rhetts_mama · 09-01-2010, 07:11 PM

So then, if a black and tan yorkie doesn't meet standard, for what ever reason, should it not be registered either?

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama

So then, if a black and tan yorkie doesn't meet standard, for what ever reason, should it not be registered either?

My black and tan bitch is registered and so is my cotton coated dog and both are "my" loving pets. But yet my first yorkie had papers but I never registered her. Acutally all my spayed/neutered yorkies are registered. What is that a double standard?

Breezeaway · 09-01-2010, 07:21 PM

Donna, What is your purpose of registering a litter with AKC?

Rhetts_mama · 09-01-2010, 07:21 PM

Sorry- I meant to quote Mardelin in my last post. She's the one who said that parti's shouldn't even be registered.

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

Donna, What is your purpose of registering a litter with AKC?

Ummm because I show and I register a litter because they are AKC? Want me to register with ACA, CKC or the other off registeries? What is your point ane what is wrong with registering my dogs? I do show and they have to be registered to be able so show?

Breezeaway · 09-01-2010, 07:27 PM

I am asking why you said you would register a litter if it had a parti in it, if they are all to be neutered and spayed and you dont believe in the parti, why would you have it registered? You say they cant be shown, so I am confused?

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brooklynn

Ummm because I show and I register a litter because they are AKC? Want me to register with ACA, CKC or the other off registeries? What is your point ane what is wrong with registering my dogs? I do show and they have to be registered to be able so show?

I keep track of my dogs through AKC is one reason and some pet owners want a papered dog...I register a litter but doesn't necessarily mean I would register anymore pets I would decide to keep but I breed for show and in hopes that the litter I produce will produce a show dog so it's already registeed with AkC with a number and all I would have to do is give the one I keep a name so I could show it...obviously your not understanding the concept or don't want too. But of course that is only my opinion.
I don't care if the new pet owner registers it but when it's registered I'm more apt to keep tabs on the dog. AKC does make sure I records are accurate if I were one to have an AKC rep come inspect my breeding program and you have to have records of the litters produced. However, I breed on a very limited basis as everyone is well aware of.

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

I am asking why you said you would register a litter if it had a parti in it, if they are all to be neutered and spayed and you dont believe in the parti, why would you have it registered? You say they cant be shown, so I am confused?

Just because it's a parti doesn't mean the new owner wouldn't want it registered. I'm not one of those that would keep something a secret, they do deserve a loving home as a pet. Just like the black and tan is not quality for the ring but I register them in case that loving pet home wants a papered dog. I love all dogs I just wouldn't keep it in a breeding program. Registering with AKC does have good recording keeping and tracking. I'm not against registering it just against breeding it. Just like I have two neutered champions that have never sired a litter. No double standards.

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama

Sorry- I meant to quote Mardelin in my last post. She's the one who said that parti's shouldn't even be registered.

No problem. All breeders do different things. If the new pet puppy owner wanted it registered with papers I have no problem with it. I just wouldn't breed the parents again.

Brooklynn · 09-01-2010, 07:48 PM

I'm not a heartless person when it concerns my dogs, I just do the right thing when I'm suppose too. My dogs are my top priority and again, just because they are pet quality doesn't mean they can't be a great and loving pet for a loving new owner, it's what I do when something comes up that is not within standard is where the ethics and morals fall into place within my breeding program.

shodanusmc · 09-02-2010, 07:46 AM

I have no problem with Parti's, and they would make nice pets. Just not to be shown or bred. If one comes from a litter, place it in a pet home, and no more breeding for the parents. Even the cane Corso has color standards that can be shown. Only BYB's would accept an off color, and the clueless would buy one.

09-01-2010, 07:11 PM	#50
Rhetts_mama Donating YT 4000 Club Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,959 Blog Entries: 1	So then, if a black and tan yorkie doesn't meet standard, for what ever reason, should it not be registered either? __________________ Don't get your knickers in a knot. Nothing is solved and it just makes you walk funny.

09-01-2010, 07:21 PM	#53
Rhetts_mama Donating YT 4000 Club Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,959 Blog Entries: 1	Sorry- I meant to quote Mardelin in my last post. She's the one who said that parti's shouldn't even be registered. __________________ Don't get your knickers in a knot. Nothing is solved and it just makes you walk funny.

09-01-2010, 07:48 PM	#59
Brooklynn Donating YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 4,280	I'm not a heartless person when it concerns my dogs, I just do the right thing when I'm suppose too. My dogs are my top priority and again, just because they are pet quality doesn't mean they can't be a great and loving pet for a loving new owner, it's what I do when something comes up that is not within standard is where the ethics and morals fall into place within my breeding program. __________________ Brooklynn's Yorkshire Terriers www.brooklynnyorkies.com

09-01-2010, 07:21 PM	#52
Breezeaway No Longer a Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Wildcat Country(KY) Posts: 2,114 Blog Entries: 26	Donna, What is your purpose of registering a litter with AKC?

09-01-2010, 07:27 PM	#55
Breezeaway No Longer a Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Wildcat Country(KY) Posts: 2,114 Blog Entries: 26	I am asking why you said you would register a litter if it had a parti in it, if they are all to be neutered and spayed and you dont believe in the parti, why would you have it registered? You say they cant be shown, so I am confused?

09-02-2010, 07:46 AM	#60
shodanusmc BANNED! Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Illinois Posts: 4,603	I have no problem with Parti's, and they would make nice pets. Just not to be shown or bred. If one comes from a litter, place it in a pet home, and no more breeding for the parents. Even the cane Corso has color standards that can be shown. Only BYB's would accept an off color, and the clueless would buy one.