|
Here is the honest truth...I did NOT listen to the media at all. I only really knew about this case much when I heard that it was going to be televised. I started watching it on TV and wanted to know more. I read the transcripts of police interviews, read or watched depositions, and looked at all the evidence that is released via Florida law. The media hoopla had NOTHING to do with my opinion. I could give a hoot what they say and think. That so many of them are now claiming to have doubt or knew she would be aquatinted just prove that they know nothing! I feel confident with my opinion because I believe it was based on facts. I was able to read and see a lot more than the jury ever saw. Anyhow, that is my 2 cents for anyone claiming the media has affected my opinion on this case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I knew it, I knew it, I knew it!!! I said this IMMEDIATELY after I saw that they were not going to participate in the court sponsored media interview. They have blood on their hands....and they are willing to be paid for it. DISGUSTING. |
Quote:
Cases, including death penalty cases, have been won with only circumstantial evidence (think Scott Peterson). There is no requirement that the prosecution prove motive, though I believe they did. There is no requirement that the prosecution prove method of death, again, I believe they did. Several of the jurors were reported to have left their notebooks on their seats, so they didn't even bother to refer to them during deliberations. The alt juror who spoke yesterday alluded to them discussing the case in the evenings away from the courtroom; a big no no. I'm sorry, but I think the jury failed miserably on this one. |
Hmm, not sure why the link isn't working right. Here is the article from TMZ. One of the jurors in the Casey Anthony trial has decided to go public with his side of the story -- but TMZ has learned, he's not talkin' ... unless the price is right ... and 5-figure offers are already pouring in. A publicist for the unidentified juror is sending a letter to media outlets, claiming, "Our client -- a married, college-educated, 33-year-old white male with two young children -- is willing to consider granting one or more media interviews so long as the opportunities are paid." We're told the juror has already received multiple offers from big news operations, including at least one major network.* Sources tell us ... the high offers are in the "mid 5-figures." Paid interviews are a hazy moral territory for obvious reasons -- and the publicist, Rick French, admits, paying for sit-downs is "always a sticky subject and believe me, I understand the delicacy of this type of negotiation." But French insists ... sticky or not, his client ain't budging -- "He will not entertain any offers that don't include compensation for a myriad of reasons." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they made their decision with profit in mind, that is sick. Also profit off of the death of a little girl for whatever reason is also sick. And very sad. |
One thing I guess we all agree on is the fact this girl has some real problems. Mental problems. Now she is saying she wants another baby?????? What on earth. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The evidence isn't supposed to erase their doubts, it's supposed to erase REASONABLE doubts. Heck, Bozo could have said that space aliens abducted and murdered Caylee and that jury would have bought it. Dan Abrahms had a fantastic tweet last night: There is a real case to be made that this was a not guilty verdict despite the defense team. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hmmm....hadn't heard that bit of info. Not good. |
Quote:
|
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use