I'm getting a dna test done. Then what??

[McheleM]

Originally Posted by pstinard

I didn't post any private or personal information, I quoted it directly from the forum--I just added my own commentary, which is also public knowledge. Jen has asked publicly if there have been any changes in what Cristina has said about Minnie. At the risk of getting yelled at again, the answer is "no."

I dont care if you posted her name, address and social security number. The point is, she blocked her so SHE WOULDN'T HAVE TO SEE WHAT SHE SAID.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by McheleM

I dont care if you posted her name, address and social security number. The point is, she blocked her so SHE WOULDN'T HAVE TO SEE WHAT SHE SAID.

Okay, okay. I checked the forum rules just now and couldn't find anything in the "read me" section for new users about blocking, but I PROMISE I will refrain from quoting or posting material that may have been blocked in the future. BTW, my intentions were good, and I don't think that either person in question was traumatized (in fact, one of them thanked me), but I won't do it again. Satisfied?

[lynzy420]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Egads, Lynzy, Jen stated herself in this thread that she has blocked Cristina until this is over--I'm not revealing any secrets. I just wanted Jen to get Cristina's message. Next time I'll send her a private message. BTW, not that it's anyone's business, but I don't have a "personal relationship" with Jen. I was just trying to be helpful. I'll have to take a look at those forum rules, but I assume you were being humorous when you called yourself "MOD FOR THE DAY," because I've never been one myself. But I am chuckling about this, because I have a good sense of humor .

The smiley at the end of your snarkey remark does not erase, your snarky remark. If you are PMing someone you are having a personal relationship, says I the MOD FOR THE DAY.

Ok, I am done with this, I've reported you and myself. Have a great day.

[lynzy420]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Okay, okay. I checked the forum rules just now and couldn't find anything in the "read me" section for new users about blocking, but I PROMISE I will refrain from quoting or posting material that may have been blocked in the future. BTW, my intentions were good, and I don't think that either person in question was traumatized (in fact, one of them thanked me), but I won't do it again. Satisfied?

Eh, maybe not done. Take your snarky remarks and smileys and.....

[Nancy1999]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Okay, okay. I checked the forum rules just now and couldn't find anything in the "read me" section for new users about blocking, but I PROMISE I will refrain from quoting or posting material that may have been blocked in the future. BTW, my intentions were good, and I don't think that either person in question was traumatized (in fact, one of them thanked me), but I won't do it again. Satisfied?

I'm shocked people are upset with you for doing this, we do it all the time here, I think your motives were to help calm the argument, and some people seem to want to keep it going.

[lillymae]

Originally Posted by Nancy1999

I'm shocked people are upset with you for doing this, we do it all the time here, I think your motives were to help calm the argument, and some people seem to want to keep it going.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by Nancy1999

I'm shocked people are upset with you for doing this, we do it all the time here, I think your motives were to help calm the argument, and some people seem to want to keep it going.

It's all right, and you are correct about my motives, but I've asked the administrator to delete my controversial posts.

[lillymae]

Originally Posted by pstinard

It's all right, and you are correct about my motives, but I've asked the administrator to delete my controversial posts.

You need to go back & tell ADMIN you changed your mind

[lovespandp]

LOL OMG is all I'm saying

[lillymae]

Originally Posted by McheleM

No, Jen doesn't need to know anything until she gets the DNA results back, then she can choose to speak to the breeder if she CHOOSES. The point of blocking another member is so you don't have to see what's posted by said member. For another member to intentionally post what is said is rude and disrespectful.

Yes she does as the breeder is in her own way trying to make peace & Jen NEEDS to know this as that's what Jen is so upset about ( the fighting ) Go read the messages on the Breeders page & you will see. This is the ONLY way to resolve the situation. Why anyone would NOT want it resolved is just beyond me

[Nancy1999]

Originally Posted by lillymae

Yes she does as the breeder is in her own way trying to make peace & Jen NEEDS to know this as that's what Jen is so upset about ( the fighting ) Go read the messages on the Breeders page & you will see. This is the ONLY way to resolve the situation. Why anyone would NOT want it resolved is just beyond me

Agreed! I would think both parties would want to avoid court.

[lynzy420]

Originally Posted by lillymae

Yes she does as the breeder is in her own way trying to make peace & Jen NEEDS to know this as that's what Jen is so upset about ( the fighting ) Go read the messages on the Breeders page & you will see. This is the ONLY way to resolve the situation. Why anyone would NOT want it resolved is just beyond me

No this is not the only way to resolve this, nor should it be resolved here. The only way this should be resolved is by 2 adults who have a contract sitting down/talking/ communicating in person/phone and handling this when the test comes back, not through 3rd, 4th, and etc., parties on a forum. It borders on rediculous at this point, IMHO.

This is a living breathing pup we are talking about, is it not? I would think this pup deserves some dignity too, but thats just how I think about animals.

When the test comes back...someone please let me know what the result is, and I really hope OP posts a pic of document.

[ladyjane]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Oh, I see! Do you recommend a BAT test even if a Yorkie is showing no symptoms, as a means of catching potential liver problems we don't see yet? (Note to self: I will not hijack this thread, I will not hijack this thread... ) Okay, I feel better now. So you're recommending that Minnie get a BAT test at 16 weeks and at 6 months?

Just a little FYI: It is not really common to SEE potential liver problems when they are in fact there.

In speaking with a vet yesterday about BATs, he told me he relies more on an ammonia level since BATs are not always totally reliable.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by ladyjane

Just a little FYI: It is not really common to SEE potential liver problems when they are in fact there.

In speaking with a vet yesterday about BATs, he told me he relies more on an ammonia level since BATs are not always totally reliable.

I'll ask my vet about the various liver function tests when Bella goes in for her next checkup. I might get a complete blood panel...

[ladyjane]

Originally Posted by dawn27

http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/gen...-my-puppy.html

I remember that thread. The OP was flipping our because her sister was having sex with her "baby" in the same room !!

Originally Posted by MyDearSam

That's the one! Thanks for the link, Anny and Dawn. I couldn't remember the title of the thread.

I forgot about that one! hahahha...thanks for the reminder! Needed a chuckle today.