I'm getting a dna test done. Then what??

[yorkietalkjilly]

Thank you! We'll be reading until our eyes are crossed but it'll be fun.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Layman's articles on genetics of skull shape and differences between dog breeds. I'm posting these links now so I can find the official research articles on Monday:

The Genes Behind Fido's Facial Features | Dog Anatomy | LiveScience

Genes for Dogs Breeds Discovered | LiveScience

Research article on skull shape:

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/...l.pgen.1002849

Another article on skull shape:

The Genetics of Canine Skull Shape Variation

To summarize the articles on dog skull shape, there are about 5 genes that regulate the difference between brachycephalic (short pug-like nose) and dolichocephalic (long collie-like nose). Although Minnie's nose is longer than a typical Yorkie's nose, it's still on the short side, so maybe one or two of the skull shape genes are "off type." Unless Minnie is subjected to thorough DNA testing (which would be prohibitively expensive unless she were part of a university research project on off-type dogs), we'll probably never know. The take-away lesson from these articles for Yorkie breeders is to get an idea of how many genes control each trait, so they can test their breeding stock should tests ever become publicly available, and so they can figure out how easy or difficult it would be to eliminate particular off types from their breeding stock. Enjoy your summer reading!

[MyDearSam]

I feel like I'm intruding on this conversation, so my apologies. I just wanted to comment on how wonderful the thread is. Not only for the information being shared, but for the sheer delight I see in the individual posts. It's like a group of kids getting to go behind the scenes in a candy store, lol.

Although I understand very little of the more nuts and bolts terminology, I recognize the obvious love for this breed and the dedication to trying to preserve the integrity of these wonderful little beings.

[pstinard]

This is very interesting! Who holds the patent on dog breed identification using DNA analysis?

Hint 1: It is not MARS Labs.

Hint 2: It is not a pharmaceutical company.

Still don't know?

Answer: It is researchers at a federally funded research institution, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See link to the patent below:

Patent US7729863 - Methods and materials for canine breed identification - Google Patents

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by pstinard

This is very interesting! Who holds the patent on dog breed identification using DNA analysis?

Hint 1: It is not MARS Labs.

Hint 2: It is not a pharmaceutical company.

Still don't know?

Answer: It is researchers at a federally funded research institution, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See link to the patent below:

Patent US7729863 - Methods and materials for canine breed identification - Google Patents

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has a second patent application filed for canine breed identificiation using DNA analysis here:

Patent US20110224911 - METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR CANINE BREED IDENTIFICATION - Google Patents

[MauiGirl]

This has got to be one of the most fascinating threads ever on YorkieTalk. Even tough my eyes and brain fog up trying to read some of the information, I still find myself coming back for more.

I will continue to follow along and enjoy the discussions however I will be looking forward to a future installment called "Doggie DNA for Dummies" with a chapter on "DNA gone wild".

Phil, your passion for genetics is very impressive; thank you for sharing it with us all here.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by MauiGirl

This has got to be one of the most fascinating threads ever on YorkieTalk. Even tough my eyes and brain fog up trying to read some of the information, I still find myself coming back for more.

I will continue to follow along and enjoy the discussions however I will be looking forward to a future installment called "Doggie DNA for Dummies" with a chapter on "DNA gone wild".

Phil, your passion for genetics is very impressive; thank you for sharing it with us all here.

Thanks! Yes, the information is fascinating . We will have to distill it down and turn it into a "Sticky" some day. I am very pleased that the most recent research papers are available for FREE viewing! That way, we're not violating copyright laws.

[chattiesmom]

This thread has been the most exciting/enlightening/educating thread I've had the pleasure of reading - all 577 posts. It took several days to catch up between taking care of our injured stallion and playing with my 10 year old grandson. How fascinating to read all of the info on doggie DNA. I do have a question - and this isn't meant to stir the pot or change the direction of this thread.

If I am reading correctly the results of Minnie's DNA test is entirely a result of the Mars testing in which they compared the DNA samples of 10,000 dogs to Minnie's sample. I know 10,000 is a big number, but is it really when we consider all of the different dog breeds and mixes and DNA combinations possible?

Also, how many Yorkies were DNA'd to come up with the Yorkie DNA identification analysis -- and how were the Yorkies samples that were tested proven to be 100% Yorkie?

Knowing that Mars is a "for profit" company I am a bit hesitant to take the results at face value. I know I know, I'm a bit suspicious, just like I am of the dog food comparisons that are "owned by the dog food company that comes out on top.

Some time back there was a long thread about Mars testing in a Beiwer vs Parti Yorkie vs Yorkie discussion. That one got rather heated and I certainly don't want to visit that again, but after reading through that long thread and reading some of the Mars site, I kinda doubted the validity of the testing. Anywho, with that thread we didn't have a genetic expert on board to help explain all the ins and outs.

Oki, I'm done - I hope I didn't offend, I'm not even trying to be a devil's advocate and look at the flip side, I honestly want to know when and how to believe test result.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by chattiesmom

This thread has been the most exciting/enlightening/educating thread I've had the pleasure of reading - all 577 posts. It took several days to catch up between taking care of our injured stallion and playing with my 10 year old grandson. How fascinating to read all of the info on doggie DNA. I do have a question - and this isn't meant to stir the pot or change the direction of this thread.

If I am reading correctly the results of Minnie's DNA test is entirely a result of the Mars testing in which they compared the DNA samples of 10,000 dogs to Minnie's sample. I know 10,000 is a big number, but is it really when we consider all of the different dog breeds and mixes and DNA combinations possible?

Also, how many Yorkies were DNA'd to come up with the Yorkie DNA identification analysis -- and how were the Yorkies samples that were tested proven to be 100% Yorkie?

Knowing that Mars is a "for profit" company I am a bit hesitant to take the results at face value. I know I know, I'm a bit suspicious, just like I am of the dog food comparisons that are "owned by the dog food company that comes out on top.

Some time back there was a long thread about Mars testing in a Beiwer vs Parti Yorkie vs Yorkie discussion. That one got rather heated and I certainly don't want to visit that again, but after reading through that long thread and reading some of the Mars site, I kinda doubted the validity of the testing. Anywho, with that thread we didn't have a genetic expert on board to help explain all the ins and outs.

Oki, I'm done - I hope I didn't offend, I'm not even trying to be a devil's advocate and look at the flip side, I honestly want to know when and how to believe test result.

No offense taken! I sent an email to MARS Labs asking how many Yorkies were in their DNA database, and how they were certified as purebred. They replied that they had a little over 300 Yorkies in their database. The US ones were all AKC registered with pedigrees. The Canadian dogs were all Canadian Kennel Club dogs with pedigrees. The European ones were certified by the European clubs.

I think that the quality of dogs in their database is good, but they really need to add more Yorkie DNA samples to their database.

Here's a bit of interesting information about the MARS parent company:

Mars brands include: Petcare -- PEDIGREE(R) , ROYAL CANIN(R) , WHISKAS(R) , KITEKAT(R) , BANFIELD(R) Pet Hospital and NUTRO(R) ; Chocolate -- M&M'S(R) , SNICKERS(R) , DOVE(R) , GALAXY(R) , MARS(R) , MILKY WAY(R) and TWIX(R) ; Wrigley -- DOUBLEMINT(R) , EXTRA(R) , ORBIT(R) and 5(TM) chewing gums, SKITTLES(R) and STARBURST(R) candies, and ALTOIDS(R) AND LIFESAVERS(R) mints. Food -- UNCLE BEN'S(R) , DOLMIO(R) , EBLY(R) , MASTERFOODS(R) , SEEDS OF CHANGE(R) and ROYCO(R) ; Drinks -- ALTERRA COFFEE ROASTERS(TM), THE BRIGHT TEA COMPANY(TM), KLIX(R) and FLAVIA(R) ; Symbioscience -- COCOAVIA(R) WISDOM PANEL(R) and SERAMIS(R) .

From: New Improved Dog DNA Test Now Covers 200+ Breeds And Varieties - WSJ.com

[gemy]

Folks the time has come, the walrus said to speak of many things,

Of dogs and cats and other fancy stuff

Like DNA and Health tests, and other Science stuff.

What say you all to a Science Forum? Where we could encapsulate in some orderly fashion a whole host of research, fascinating discussions, and get to broaden our horizons?

[gemy]

Originally Posted by chattiesmom

Oki, I'm done - I hope I didn't offend, I'm not even trying to be a devil' It isadvocate and look at the flip side, I honestly want to know when and how to believe test result.

You should read the blue silver Yorkie thread for some more interesting an enlightening DNA discussion too It is on the General Forum too!

[gemy]

Originally Posted by pstinard

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has a second patent application filed for canine breed identificiation using DNA analysis here:

Patent US20110224911 - METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR CANINE BREED IDENTIFICATION - Google Patents

Any astute guess why, they leapt in first on this I have two guesses

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by gemy

Folks the time has come, the walrus said to speak of many things,

Of dogs and cats and other fancy stuff

Like DNA and Health tests, and other Science stuff.

What say you all to a Science Forum? Where we could encapsulate in some orderly fashion a whole host of research, fascinating discussions, and get to broaden our horizons?

A science forum is a great idea! I think there is enough interest to support it.

[pstinard]

Originally Posted by gemy

Any astute guess why, they leapt in first on this I have two guesses

I thought it strange that Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center was late in filing patents, considering that MARS Labs has been doing this kind of testing since 2007. I did a quick search for patents by MARS Labs and couldn't find any, but I didn't do a thorough search, so I'll check again later. With that in mind, by two guesses in answer to your question are:

(1) Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center is going to start up their own business of dog breed testing by DNA analysis, or

(2) They want to get paid some royalties by MARS Labs for using their technology. Not sure if they can get royalties though if MARS was doing this first.

[gemy]

My guess is that they realized perhaps later than 2007, how much the dog genome and DNA testing could really advance human cancer research. Or so I have read in a number of places on the web....

Then they looked and found nobody had patented it so why not them?

Also if they successfully replicate DNA strands and morph them into cancer similar to humans, they can test out certain drug and other cancer protocols on that sequence.