![]() |
Quote:
BTW, is Scooter still on the anti seizure medications to control his seizures? |
Quote:
I have not seen Scooter since 2007. |
Ok I'm confused .How can an inbred dog be a pedagree ? Why would you breed a half brother and sister. Third why would you buy one . Why is thread going again . sheesh |
Quote:
Half brother to half sister is not line breeding, this is inbreeding. Only the very experienced breeders do this on occassion. Usually when bringing in a new line. It is done to lock in a type, but in doing so you are also locking in faults. So, one has to be very careful when doing and accept responsibility for the outcome. Usually it is done not without the intent of selling puppies. A breeder will keep them and run them through to monitor for months. |
Quote:
Please don't think I'm dogging you. But, your statement is incorrect. Should a puppy have a medical condion that can be managed with meds/surgery. A reputable breeder will return the fee of the dog and allow the pup to be kept. This is done to assist with medical costs. |
Quote:
I am afraid to many people are doing this without any knowledge or experience or understanding of what the outcome could be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
IM amazed by some of the statements by breeders on here |
Quote:
|
To answer your questions JeanieK. Scooter has a full sister whom as of to date now has had NO seizures. Yes Scooters parents were bred to other dogs and none of those puppies ever produced puppies with seizures that I know of to this date. No I was not given a name and number of Mrs McSwains Vet. No I was never given a Vet statement. I have bought puppies in the past and if the puppy was found to have a problem by my Vet, my Vet would call the breeder themself. I have dealt with several Vets in my lifetime and this has been common practice by all those Vets. I did not receive a call from her Vet. Mrs. McSwain, would you please share the new owners phone number with me so I can find out for myself how Scooter's doing since you have not been concerned enough to talk with them in the last 3 years? I in no way come on here to hurt or offend anyone - I'm just here to try to repair my damaged name and felt that these issues needed to be pointed out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are SIMPLY AWESOME :D:p:D! |
OK, I should probably shut up, but I have to say that genetics are complicated. It's possible for a line to carry a recessive gene (say for a protein chain deficiency) and it will not be expressed for many generations. That's because each dog will still have one good gene that overrides a defect. The line will continue fine until two dogs who both carry it (say half-siblings) breed. Then each of their pups will have a 1:4 chance of not carrying the gene at all, 2:4 chance of carrying the gene and being totally healthy (but now they are both carriers themselves) and a 1:4 chance of getting both copies of the gene and then expressing symptoms. Plus then there is always the possibility of a spontaneous gene mutation that NO ONE could have seen coming, no matter what the lineage. I'm NOT saying this is what happened in THIS case. Just that because only one pup out of a litter is sick and the rest are healthy and because this type of thing hadn't happened in the line before now doesn't rule out that there is a genetic component. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=Rhetts_mama;3163911]OK, I should probably shut up, but I have to say that genetics are complicated. It's possible for a line to carry a recessive gene (say for a protein chain deficiency) and it will not be expressed for many generations. That's because each dog will still have one good gene that overrides a defect. The line will continue fine until two dogs who both carry it (say half-siblings) breed. Then each of their pups will have a 1:4 chance of not carrying the gene at all, 2:4 chance of carrying the gene and being totally healthy (but now they are both carriers themselves) and a 1:4 chance of getting both copies of the gene and then expressing symptoms. Plus then there is always the possibility of a spontaneous gene mutation that NO ONE could have seen coming, no matter what the lineage. I'm NOT saying this is what happened in THIS case. I agree and just because one puppy has health issues due to genetic problems does not mean all the puppies do. Look at Liver Shunt. I have never seen a whole litter get LS (maybe has happened I just have never read this) but I do know most reputable breeders will not breed the two dogs together again because of the one puppy. |
Quote:
Oh yes, Your right I had no concern for Scooter. I did not sit and cry when the poor thing had seizures one after another. I didn't care enough to spend 4 days/nights at the vet office trying to help him. I did not sleep right beside him each night to comfort him after the seizures. I did not spend money on Vet visits, his meds and tests trying to get the seizures his under control. I didn't care enough once his seizures were under control to screen 30 people and get him placed in the best possible home (FREE). And now after 5 years your showing concern ??? After you recieve a letter from my lawyer about returning the money paid for him to go toward his treatment. What did you send me back ??? A 72 hour contract highlighed ALL SALES ARE FINAL !! |
Quote:
1. If he wasn't used for breeding how come his lines are continued in dogs you now have and breed ? 2. Why would you give him away to someone without neutering him first? |
"Mom to 6 Chihuahuas 1 Yorkie and 5 Cats! Ok...maybe I am a little twisted! :confused:" This made me laugh. |
Quote:
Please everyone be aware of what you are signing. But I totally agree the o/p did not come on here after 5 years due to a deep concern over this poor dog. |
I have to agree mojo. :thumbup: It doesn't necessarily make what some breeders do moral, but at some point you have to take responsibility for the agreements you enter, even if you were unaware and unprepared at the time and more knowledgeable now. Just a hard lesson learned sometimes and "I didn't know better" will only go so far. (Generally speaking.) |
Quote:
As for a breeder allowing someone to keep the dog and agreeing to pay for the vet bills. That would be pretty risky, like giving someone a blank check, expecting them to use it responsibly. If I am going to pay for the care, I would want to be the one making the decisions about his care. |
Quote:
A reputable breeder would work with the vet, new pup owner to get at the bottom of the problem. If it is diagnosed as a genetic defect, a reputable/responsible breeder would refund the pet fee and let the owner keep the pup. The refund is to assist in the medical care of the pup, that would be a reputable breeders main priority and standing behind ones dogs. Not the money. |
For a moment when I looked at the title, I thought it was about me. Carry on! |
Where's Judge Judy??? |
Quote:
|
This thread has gone entirely too long. I am sick of seeing it at the top. |
Quote:
What was the final diagnosis of this pup with seizures? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use