Woogie Man | 02-05-2010 10:42 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickSilver
(Post 2989858)
Coming back to the party....
First, I'd like to point out that the article Jim posted is directly contradicted by an article that livingdustmops posted earlier. To summarize, the proposition is that newborns of species with especially helpless young, like dogs and humans, don't feel as much pain as the adults, because their nervous systems are not fully developed. I'm not really up on this issue, so I can't say if this is definitely true or definitely false. Just wanted to point out there appears to be a debate on this issue.
Second: whelping for yorkies seems exceptionally dangerous, and if that could be made less dangerous by increasing the standard size, then I reeeeeeeally hope this is at least being considered. How could a breed club claim to support the welfare of the animal if things like this AREN'T considered??
Third: this is a good reminder to us all to do more than just talk. I'm sure many here are interested in helping more. The more it can be broken into dummy steps for those of us who are less educated in this area, the easier it is for us to start! | Just to clarify, I didn't post the article as a rebuttal to what Cindy (livingdustmops) posted. It just seemed to me that the article was pertinent to the issue and was science based. People can make of it what they will, but we all know that hoofed mammals must show some independence the moment they hit the ground. Mammals such as canines felines, rodents, apes and humans have babies that are totally dependent for quite some time and definitely don't have the motor skills of field animals. My mind would tell me that the lack of motor skills shows an immature nervous system which would relate to the ability to sense pain, among other sensory functions.
As for your second point, I personally like the bigger ones but don't think that increasing the standard size would necessarily mean safer whelps. The standard is for up to seven pounds. If you changed the standard to read up to 12 pounds, for instance, you would still have people breeding the smaller ones. Also, bigger dogs can have problem whelps, too. So far (knock on wood), my girls have been free whelpers. I think it all has to do with physical condition as much as anything. They are very active and have good muscle tone. People do tend to pamper toy breeds and some may not have the strength, due to lack of activity, to free whelp.
I do wish the standard was more clearly written. There are terms like 'tail cut to medium length' and 'well sprung rib' and 'a balanced appearance' that can be mis-interpreted, especially by new breeders. They really do become less vague with experience, but newer breeders might find a more explicit standard helpful.
I know it won't happen, but I'd like to see a class set up for the larger Yorkies, too, as with the Poodle. I always see the smaller Poodles and it's real treat to see a Standard Poodle....they're so impressive. Imagine going to a dog show and seeing a ring full of 12 pound Yorkies on parade. With a bigger dog, there's more room for a longer coat....all that hair just flowing....truly would be a sight to see. |