![]() |
Quote:
"As I have said before, I have no objection to the idea of stem cell therapy. Unlike some alternative methods which are based on unscientific or pseudoscientific theories, stem cell therapy is a biologically plausible approach with encouraging preclinical and pilot clinical trial research behind it. My only concern is that expensive and invasive clinical interventions are being aggressively marketed to vets and pet owners without adequate evidence to support that they are safe and effective." So anyone claiming that the Skeptvet said that stem cell therapy doesn't work is misrepresenting his statements. |
Quote:
Dr. Dodds recommends that companion animals are tested annually as – similar to humans – their food sensitivities and intolerances change over time. from NutriScan Food Sensitivity and Intolerance Test for Cats and Dogs |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Is the product or practice promoted as a “Major Breakthrough,” “Revolutionary,” “Magic,” or “Miraculous”? 2. Do the promotions try to simply elicit an emotional reaction rather than present clear information to help you make an informed decision about the product? 3. Is only anecdotal or testimonial evidence used to support claims of effectiveness? 4. Are claims made about scientific support without giving specific details? Watch out for the following: Few or no references given to original research studies. Studies done by only one researcher. Studies done at obscure, unknown institutions. Studies reported in small or virtually unknown journals. Studies reported decades ago. Studies that have not been repeated. Funding of research by someone with a financial or professional stake in the results. 5. Is the information about the therapy or product being provided by a professional lacking in the proper credentials? Warning Signs of Quackery and Fraud – Part 1 | Dr. Walt's Health Blog |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Guys, lately we're seeing a lot of snarkiness and disdainful remarks toward those who are seeking treatments or ideas that others just don't agree with...please don't go to that level of treating others disdainfully. Disagree with their decisions or treatments all you want, but please be respectful about it while doing it. There is nothing to be gained or learned from being disdainful toward others...and anyway, in the end, it really just makes the writer look bad/mean. |
Quote:
That bothers me too! As well as being asked recommended to do it yearly! That would have to be shown to be really necessary - for $280 I will do my blood work annually - better investment of my $$ |
Just because people are speaking out against the validity of the saliva test does not mean they are disrespecting the people who use it. I don't like people saying things about my choices, such as the choice to use Hill's, Purina and RC products...BUT what I find offensive is when they label them as crap or other such terms and have NO real evidence that their claims are true. The bottom line here is that Dr. Dodds is selling something that has no real research to prove her claims. I don't see the talk about it as disrespectful to anyone....people are merely pointing out the truth. I am sorry that Jenny feels as she does because I don't believe anyone has any issue at all or means to be disrespectful to her. She is an awesome young lady. Yes, she made her choice to use this test....and it is not going to harm her pups. That does not make the test valid nor does the fact that she swears by it going to lead people to agree that it is a great product and worth the money spent. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use