![]() |
I haven't by any stretch read all the posts here. Is OP going to post the test and everyone is just waiting to see it? |
I just took a look at my test for Momoko. When I adopted her, I was told that she she was an F1 Morkie. However, when I had the test done, I didn't specify between the purebred/mixed breed/designer dog. I just wanted to see what results would come back. Anyway, here's a link to Momo's test...it will give you a vague idea of how Mars interprets the data: http://goo.gl/6UHDx |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Drum roll please... (Minnie's test results, part 1) 4 Attachment(s) Jen emailed me the link to Minnie's test results and asked me to post them with personally identifiable information (full name and address, etc.) removed, and here are the first 4 pages. The last two pages will follow in a separate post. Because the only breed detected in Minnie's DNA was Yorkshire Terrier, they did a FREE purebred test (thanks MARS!). Minnie does indeed test as a purebred Yorkshire Terrier. That said, she does fall on the edges of the Yorkie group in the PCA analysis (the two pages that will be in my next post). In other words, Minnie doesn't fall in the middle of the group of typical Yorkies, but doesn't fall completely outside the group either. I'm sure that the other Yorkies in the MARS database conform reasonably well to breed standards (I sent an email to MARS asking how they chose the Yorkies they use as a DNA standard in their database, but they haven't replied yet). My conclusion is that Minnie's unusual appearance is due to a few single gene mutations that were either carried by her parents (most likely), or arose spontaneously (less likely, but still possible). If anyone has questions, please ask! Jen, I recommend that you send an email to the MARS Lab's customer service along with a photo of Minnie and ask for their explanation of Minnie's appearance as well. |
Drum roll please... (Minnie's test results, part 2) 2 Attachment(s) Here are the last two pages of Minnie's DNA test report. These are the heart of the purebred test, the PCA analysis, which I described in my last post. There is a lot of meat in these graphs, so if anyone has questions about what they mean, please ask! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok I read the results and while I'm no geneticist, I can see that she is in the lowest range, but I still just can't see Minnie as a Yorkie, how sad that the breed is being so over bred that we can't even decipher the Yorkie from the Yorkie anymore. Minnie is beautiful, don't get me wrong, she really is gorgeous, I would have loved to have a pup that looks like her she is so unique...at the end of the day the final analysis yields that Minnie is a Yorkie, the breeder did not lie, but the breeder did knowingly sell a very obvious poor representation of the Yorkie Standard, not sure there is any recourse here. What say you Pstinard? |
I had to read this post, not all of it but enough to know the concern about the yorkie not being a yorkie. I'm totally in shock that the DNA came back saying it was indeed a yorkie. I do breed yorkies and have DNA done on them. I do this for the buyer. I know there are a lot of "yorkies" that sure don't look like pure breds...and the so called designer dogs..really! Most all dogs are cute, but you should get what you paid for.. I don't remember if this yorkie is AKC registered but I would NEVER buy one that wasn't..that is a big red flag. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use