YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community

YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Yorkshire Terrier Discussion (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/general-yorkshire-terrier-discussion/)
-   -   Tail Docking (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/general-yorkshire-terrier-discussion/23826-tail-docking.html)

alisonJ 11-28-2005 06:24 PM

Tail Docking
 
I might be stirring up a little trouble here, but I am curious about your opinon of tail docking. Edie has her tail docked, like most Yorkies. It used to be the conventional wisdom that puppies only a day or two old did not feel pain as much as older dogs, and that tail docking was not considered cruel. The more I read, the more veterinarians are saying that it DOES hurt them, and it poses unnecessary risks for infection.

Since tail docking is only for cosmetic purposes, I am considering that in the future, I will request that the breeder not dock the tail of a puppy that i purchase.

I have seen Yorkies with undocked tails, and they are very cute.

More and more, this procedure is being banned (in other countries, primarily). Here is one link that has some info
[URL=http://www.helpinganimals.com/h-mut-ear.html]

You may have heard that PETA is suing the Westminster dog show because certain breeds must have docked tails in order to compete. They might be suing AKC also...am not sure.

When you think about it, it is really senseless, isn't it???. What do you think???? :confused: Anyone here with an undocked Yorkie???

Thorsmomma 11-28-2005 06:27 PM

Great point. This is a topic that really interests me. I think that they deff. feel pain, and it has to be traumatizing!!(jmo) You are cutting through BONE to dock their tails. Although I think it is painful for the dogs, I do like the look. It would make more sense to give a local anesthetic or something...I would love to hear other people's comments.
Hannah

alisonJ 11-28-2005 06:28 PM

Here is another link about docking

http://www.angelfire.com/anime/taildocking/

Thorsmomma 11-28-2005 06:33 PM

HUmm is it just me...it didn't work...

Thorsmomma 11-28-2005 06:34 PM

Ahhh forgive me, I am impatient!

PlatinumYorkies 11-28-2005 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alisonJ
I might be stirring up a little trouble here, but I am curious about your opinon of tail docking. Edie has her tail docked, like most Yorkies. It used to be the conventional wisdom that puppies only a day or two old did not feel pain as much as older dogs, and that tail docking was not considered cruel. The more I read, the more veterinarians are saying that it DOES hurt them, and it poses unnecessary risks for infection.

Since tail docking is only for cosmetic purposes, I am considering that in the future, I will request that the breeder not dock the tail of a puppy that i purchase.

I have seen Yorkies with undocked tails, and they are very cute.

More and more, this procedure is being banned (in other countries, primarily). Here is one link that has some info
[URL=http://www.helpinganimals.com/h-mut-ear.html]

You may have heard that PETA is suing the Westminster dog show because certain breeds must have docked tails in order to compete. They might be suing AKC also...am not sure.

When you think about it, it is really senseless, isn't it???. What do you think???? :confused: Anyone here with an undocked Yorkie???

Like with human babies, the bones are very soft. I have a problem with PETA, they only step in when they can get publicity, I didn't notice them stepping in when all of those animals needed help during hurricane Katrina...Also, PETA has one of the largest freezer's in New York City...I have seen report after report about their practices...

alisonJ 11-28-2005 06:44 PM

Yes, PETA can be extreme, but they aren't always wrong. In fact, I agree with them on their stance about fur (but that is another subject).

After reading this article

http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfiel...e/816/id30.htm

I have pretty much decided to never have a dogs tail docked.

This part really got to me:

Tail docking involves the removal of all or part of the tail using cutting or crushing instruments. Muscles, tendons, 4 to 7 pairs of nerves and sometimes bone or cartilage are severed. The initial pain from the direct injury to the nervous system would be intense and at a level that would not be permitted to be inflicted on humans. The subsequent tissue injury and inflammation, especially if the tail is left to heal as an open would will produce the algogenic substances (Pain killing), the 'sensitising soup' and the 'dorsal horn wind up' required for peripheral and central sensitisation and the development of ongoing pathological pain.


Puppies are usually subjected to this pain and trauma at 2 to 5 days of age when the level of pain would be much greater than an adult would experience because the efferent stimuli reaching the dorsal horn from a greater density of sensitised cutaneous nociceptors will exceed that of the adult and the strength and frequency of painful stimuli reaching the brain will be greater because inhibitory pain pathways will not be developed.


The whimpering and the 'escape response' (continual movements) exhibited by most puppies following tail docking, are evidence that they are feeling substantial pain. Animals tend to be more stoic than humans due to an inherent preservation instinct. Because some puppies do not show signs of intense suffering it does not mean that the pain inflicted on them has not registered in their central nervous system. Cosmetic tail docking is most often performed without any anesthesia or analgesia and only manual restraint is used.

livingdustmops 11-28-2005 06:46 PM

I would kill to get a Yorkie with a tail....I LOVE IT! :D

This does not effect Yorkie's but you would have to include ear docking (I think that is the term), declawing a cat as well. I am not in favor of either of these but I was talking to a friend from the south the other day that said alot of dogs with floppy ears got more ear infections than docked ears because of the hot and humid conditions. I thought that was interesting and food for thought. Another point is dew claws on a dog that easily can be ripped so it does seem kinder to do this when it is still a few days old than surgery down the road.

I will tell you that most of my dogs are probably from backyard breeders and they did a lousy job with their tails or lack of tail would be a better description. I only have one from a show breeder that has a very nice tail the rest are just stubbs. :eek:

It would not be a choice I would make and if I was buying a puppy I would ask to leave it's tails on. But the chance of me buying a puppy are nill.

Interesting topic.

LittleMsScruffy 11-28-2005 06:53 PM

Tail Docking
 
I'm new here and haven't officially introduced my little one but this is one thread I have to reply to. My precious baby was given to me by a coworker that found her lost and sick wondering the streets. She was 4 months old and even though my coworker posted Found signs all over her neighborhood no one ever claimed her. We didn't find this strange considering that she was so unhealthy that she looked like a mutt :) Well she is healthy now but apart from her floppy ears she also has a long tail. My vet warned me that if I was going to Dock it I would have to do it immediatly because she was already 4 months old. My first question to him was "is it cosmetic or for health reasons"? After finding out it was simply cosmetics my husband and I decided that we were not going to do it. Besides would I like it if my parents would have cut some part of me off just because they did not like the way I looked? I understand that there are people that have show dogs and there are others that simply like the tail docked. I respect that, but I don't like the idea. I love the fact that when my little one gets happy its so easy to see that happiness by the movement of her tail. In the mornings when she gets up (she's our alarm clock ;) ) that long tail of hers starts wacking the headboard so loud from her exitement that we just have to get up. She has been known to hit us with hit also. Not on purpose but she gets so exited that her tail just goes crazy. The tail is also great to locate her when she is catching bugs in the garden. Those moments are so special that I'm glad I did not take her little tail off.

alisonJ 11-28-2005 06:57 PM

That is a great story. I would have done the same thing. Australia is making it illegal to dock tails unless it is for the animal's well being (i.e. the tail is injured) or if it is a working dog where the tail could pose some risk of injury. The UK has a huge anti-docking contingent now. The US has been slower to take up this discussion, but I am sure we will see a lot more undocked tails in the future! I am looking forward to it.

PlatinumYorkies 11-28-2005 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alisonJ
Yes, PETA can be extreme, but they aren't always wrong. In fact, I agree with them on their stance about fur (but that is another subject).

After reading this article

http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfiel...e/816/id30.htm

I have pretty much decided to never have a dogs tail docked.

This part really got to me:

Tail docking involves the removal of all or part of the tail using cutting or crushing instruments. Muscles, tendons, 4 to 7 pairs of nerves and sometimes bone or cartilage are severed. The initial pain from the direct injury to the nervous system would be intense and at a level that would not be permitted to be inflicted on humans. The subsequent tissue injury and inflammation, especially if the tail is left to heal as an open would will produce the algogenic substances (Pain killing), the 'sensitising soup' and the 'dorsal horn wind up' required for peripheral and central sensitisation and the development of ongoing pathological pain.


Puppies are usually subjected to this pain and trauma at 2 to 5 days of age when the level of pain would be much greater than an adult would experience because the efferent stimuli reaching the dorsal horn from a greater density of sensitised cutaneous nociceptors will exceed that of the adult and the strength and frequency of painful stimuli reaching the brain will be greater because inhibitory pain pathways will not be developed.


The whimpering and the 'escape response' (continual movements) exhibited by most puppies following tail docking, are evidence that they are feeling substantial pain. Animals tend to be more stoic than humans due to an inherent preservation instinct. Because some puppies do not show signs of intense suffering it does not mean that the pain inflicted on them has not registered in their central nervous system. Cosmetic tail docking is most often performed without any anesthesia or analgesia and only manual restraint is used.

Can, I ask you a personal question...When you were looking for yorkies, did you ask the breeder did she dock the tails? DId you look for yorkies that tails were still attached, or for a breeder who just had her litter so you could have a say in the docking of your yorkies tail. In dog's where the breed standard calls for docked tails, it's not Cosmetic.

PETA isn't a great representer of anything, but fur. Even, that is questionable.

alisonJ 11-28-2005 07:11 PM

To tell you the truth, tail docking was not on my radar screen at the time I got Edie (5 years ago). I admit that I did not do all the research I should have done before I got Edie---but I did a lot after I got her. Fortunately, we were lucky, she is healthy, and we did a lot of things right without even knowing it. I would have done it differently now. by doing all the research beforehand.

I have to disagree with you...the breed standard is based on cosmetics.... So the tail docking is a breed standard AND it is cosmetic. The Australian Kennel Club is now allowing undocked tails in competitions, and many undocked dogs are WINNING in the UK and AUS.

The British Veterinary Association, the British Small Animal Veterinary Association, the World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) and the RCVS are all opposed to the docking of puppies’ tails. Veterinary bodies and welfare organisations such as Dogs Trust believe that puppies are caused unnecessary pain as a result of docking and are deprived of a vital form of canine expression.

Tail docking began hundreds of years ago when people had a very different attitude to dogs and ’animal welfare’ was unheard of. Docking is thought to have been (mostly mistakenly) used for the following reasons; to increase a dog’s speed, prevention of damage in dog fights, prevention of back injury, rabies prevention and even tax evasion!
These days, the main reasons given for keeping docking are:

To avoid tail damage
Reasons of hygiene
To maintain breed standards

To maintain breed standards? This is docking for cosmetic reasons and that is just not good enough! The Kennel Club (in the UK) changed the breed standards so that previously docked breeds could now be shown with tails, so there’s really no excuse. The pain and disadvantages associated with docking cannot be allowed just so that a dog will look a certain way. Dogs are born with tails for a reason – if they didn’t need them, evolution would have made them smaller or got rid of them altogether by now!

Check this out...
http://www.anti-dockingalliance.co.uk/

alisonJ 11-28-2005 07:14 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I think this is a very cute yorkie--tail and all!

PlatinumYorkies 11-28-2005 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alisonJ
Tail docking began hundreds of years ago when people had a very different attitude to dogs and ’animal welfare’ was unheard of. Docking is thought to have been (mostly mistakenly) used for the following reasons; to increase a dog’s speed, prevention of damage in dog fights, prevention of back injury, rabies prevention and even tax evasion!
These days, the main reasons given for keeping docking are:

To avoid tail damage
Reasons of hygiene
To maintain breed standards

To maintain breed standards? This is docking for cosmetic reasons and that is just not good enough! The Kennel Club (in the UK) changed the breed standards so that previously docked breeds could now be shown with tails, so there’s really no excuse. The pain and disadvantages associated with docking cannot be allowed just so that a dog will look a certain way. Dogs are born with tails for a reason – if they didn’t need them, evolution would have made them smaller or got rid of them altogether by now!

Actually, you left out the none cosmetic reasons for tail docking :eek: , Hygiene, and avoising tail damage.

alisonJ 11-28-2005 07:22 PM

oh--glad you mentioned that....I think most docking is done for cosmetics, but there are 2 other "excuses"...to avoid tail damage and for hygiene reasons....Here are the arguements against those reasons. I didn't write all of this, but it makes sense to me....


Is avoiding tail damage a good reason for docking?? Any dog can damage their tail but not all dogs are docked. Why are some ‘working’ dogs docked and not others? Why aren’t any of the Retrievers or Setters docked? They’ve got waggier tails than most breeds I know. Why not the hounds? They were bred to hunt over all sorts of terrain, and yet they’re allowed to keep their tails. It doesn’t make much sense to me.

The BSAVA states that they do not believe there is any scientific evidence to show that undocked working dogs damage their tails any more than undocked non-working dogs and therefore see no justification for an exemption for working dogs. Surely this says it all?

Are Reasons of hygiene a reason to dock tails? Call me crazy but isn’t it more humane (though less convenient and time consuming obviously!) to wash or clip the hair away from a dog’s bottom than to chop off his tail? If a dog is regularly groomed, healthy and eating good quality food then there shouldn’t be a lot of muck around his bottom anyway.

The RCVS says that faecal soiling is not a disease or injury and so cannot be a justifiable reason for docking a dog. I agree.

PlatinumYorkies 11-28-2005 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alisonJ
oh--glad you mentioned that....I think most docking is done for cosmetics, but there are 2 other "excuses"...to avoid tail damage and for hygiene reasons....Here are the arguements against those reasons. I didn't write all of this, but it makes sense to me....


Is avoiding tail damage a good reason for docking?? Any dog can damage their tail but not all dogs are docked. Why are some ‘working’ dogs docked and not others? Why aren’t any of the Retrievers or Setters docked? They’ve got waggier tails than most breeds I know. Why not the hounds? They were bred to hunt over all sorts of terrain, and yet they’re allowed to keep their tails. It doesn’t make much sense to me.

The BSAVA states that they do not believe there is any scientific evidence to show that undocked working dogs damage their tails any more than undocked non-working dogs and therefore see no justification for an exemption for working dogs. Surely this says it all?

Are Reasons of hygiene a reason to dock tails? Call me crazy but isn’t it more humane (though less convenient and time consuming obviously!) to wash or clip the hair away from a dog’s bottom than to chop off his tail? If a dog is regularly groomed, healthy and eating good quality food then there shouldn’t be a lot of muck around his bottom anyway.

The RCVS says that fecal soiling is not a disease or injury and so cannot be a justifiable reason for docking a dog. I agree.

So, since you believe it is cosmetic, you will be out there protesting also...I think if you feel strongly about this and have a lot of answers, you should do something about it.

lily's mom 11-28-2005 07:55 PM

Great discussion!!!! I think if we make the point of docking being cruel, then we also have to throw dew claws and ear cropping in the mix also. I would think ear cropping would be the worst! Glad I didn't need anything chopping or removed when I was born. :eek:
Yorkies used to hunt in places that could be a hazzard to them having a tail. However, I think a long coat would have also been a hinderance. Don't know how they escaped getting short cuts and that being the breed standard. :confused:

YorkieRose 11-28-2005 08:10 PM

tails
 
I think everyone here can agree to disagree. I will continue to dock tails until it is banned.
We circumsize baby boys and pierce baby girls ears..what is the difference?

PETA do more harm to animals then help them..it is a proven fact.

YorkieRose 11-28-2005 08:17 PM

tails
 
You can show a Yorkie with a tail in AKC shows. Itis not forbidden..you won't win, but you won't be thrown out either.

feminvstr 11-28-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkieRose
You can show a Yorkie with a tail in AKC shows. Itis not forbidden..you won't win, but you won't be thrown out either.

LOL good point if you want to throw good money away why not throw it in showing a dog that will never finish. NOT!

I too agree until they ban docking and change the AKC standard I will continue to dock tails.

YorkieShadow 11-28-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkieRose
I think everyone here can agree to disagree. I will continue to dock tails until it is banned.
We circumsize baby boys and pierce baby girls ears..what is the difference?

PETA do more harm to animals then help them..it is a proven fact.

I agree. If we have a litter of puppies they will have their tails done. But I do think the longer tails are cute too. and Im glad that they do it at an early age. it would be more painfull when the tail is bigger.We use to breed boxers and we always had their tails docked.

lily's mom 11-28-2005 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkieRose
I think everyone here can agree to disagree. I will continue to dock tails until it is banned.
We circumsize baby boys and pierce baby girls ears..what is the difference?

PETA do more harm to animals then help them..it is a proven fact.

I totally agree with you Pat. I was just trying to make a point that dew claws, ear cropping and anything else that I can't think of should also be considered too. Would those who want docking to be banned also want these things banned? I think that docking would be the least painful.

whispersmom2 11-28-2005 09:17 PM

I have a Yorkie with an undocked tail. When the litter was brought to me to dock she was 2 ounces and I said "take her to the vet and have him do it" He refused for the same reason I did,,too small. I have Biewers imported from Germany who are undocked. Dewclaws are intact-that is not good as they get caught in stuff. I have a standard color Yorkie whose tail was docked so short that when she has a BM the stool hangs in the hair. It is terrible. I have Remi, an AKC parti male-docked short--don't like it! AND I have a wonderful, beautiful litter of what I jokingly call Biewtis (Biewer/parti) whose tails are intact..My little standard color with the tail looks so funny when she is relaxed, the distal 1/3 of her tail hangs down. When she is excited it waves just like the shorter ones do.
If I dock a tail, I like to dock it long-at least try to judge the adult length. Supposedly, ONE of the reasons for docking the tail was to reduce the chance that a varmint might grab it. Also, it needed to be long enough to be
grabbed with the hand and pull out the dog if it got stuck. So,I try to figure how long it might be as an adult and I use the width on my palm as a sort of gauge. Does that make any sense??

Itspuppyluv 11-28-2005 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alisonJ
Are Reasons of hygiene a reason to dock tails? Call me crazy but isn’t it more humane (though less convenient and time consuming obviously!) to wash or clip the hair away from a dog’s bottom than to chop off his tail? If a dog is regularly groomed, healthy and eating good quality food then there shouldn’t be a lot of muck around his bottom anyway.

The RCVS says that faecal soiling is not a disease or injury and so cannot be a justifiable reason for docking a dog. I agree.

I have one with an undocked tail. Hygiene is no more of a problem than one with a docked tail...they lift the tail out of the way. It is more important to keep the hair trimmed around the rectum. That is were the poo gets stuck.
I don't see why people question this about yorkies. When it comes to hygiene, why would it be any different for yorkies than any other breed? My sister has a Golden Retriever with a long, full tail. No problem with hygiene there either.

SoCalyorkiLvr 11-28-2005 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PlatinumYorkies
Can, I ask you a personal question...When you were looking for yorkies, did you ask the breeder did she dock the tails? DId you look for yorkies that tails were still attached, or for a breeder who just had her litter so you could have a say in the docking of your yorkies tail. In dog's where the breed standard calls for docked tails, it's not Cosmetic.

PETA isn't a great representer of anything, but fur. Even, that is questionable.

I disagree. The "breed standard" for the yorkshire terrier is almost entirely "cosmetic". There is no functional reason to dock a tail. It is purely for outward appearance and aesthetics at this point. The entire standard speaks almost exclusively about outward appearance and conformation. There is nothing more cosmetic than that in my opinion.

Our countyr needs to catch up and ban this barbaric and cruel practice. Talk about breeding tiny females being cruel....it is so much more cruel in my opinion to dock a 3 day out infant's tail.

Talk about trauma. I wonder how many babies have died as a result of this? Whispersmom told the story of the vet who refused to do it to a tiny baby. We just had two little ones on here die after docking tails and it may not have been what caused them to perish, but we don't know for sure.

I think all breeders need to think long and hard about this practice especially if they are only producing pets and not show dogs.

YorkyKids 11-28-2005 11:30 PM

If anyone does not like the Yorkshire Terrier as it is currently bred according to the breed standard.....then why not purchase another breed. NO ONE is forcing anyone to accept tail docking. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetic or not.....it is the standard as written today. History tells us the tail was important to the Yorkshire Terrier.....they were bred to "go to ground" grabbing a tail to withdraw the dog from the hole/tunnel was the only way to retrieve them.....so the tail was docked in order to not damage a long tail by pulling......it may sound cruel.....but that's the way it is. The Yorkie still today maintains those qualities of going to ground....they are still very much varmiant killers....they still have an independent nature. These are the qualities which endear them to us.....this also includes a docked tail. If one doesn't like that.....GET ANOTHER BREED.....no one is forcing anyone to own a docked Yorkie. JMHO

I will always dock tails....as long as the Yorkshire Terrier Club of America maintains the docking requirement in the standard. And anyone calling me to demand or even to ask for an undocked Yorkie will not get one of my dogs....period. Docking a tail is just that.....docking.....the tail at 3 or 4 days is cartiledge not bone. I've never seen any bad effects from the proper docking of a puppy tail. All of my pups just go back to nursing mamma with no ill affects. Now I do have a Yorkie with an undocked tail....she was way too tiny at even a week old to dock....so we just left it.....yes she is cute.
d

wendybee 11-29-2005 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkyKids
If anyone does not like the Yorkshire Terrier as it is currently bred according to the breed standard.....then why not purchase another breed. NO ONE is forcing anyone to accept tail docking. Doesn't matter if it's cosmetic or not.....it is the standard as written today. History tells us the tail was important to the Yorkshire Terrier.....they were bred to "go to ground" grabbing a tail to withdraw the dog from the hole/tunnel was the only way to retrieve them.....so the tail was docked in order to not damage a long tail by pulling......it may sound cruel.....but that's the way it is. The Yorkie still today maintains those qualities of going to ground....they are still very much varmiant killers....they still have an independent nature. These are the qualities which endear them to us.....this also includes a docked tail. If one doesn't like that.....GET ANOTHER BREED.....no one is forcing anyone to own a docked Yorkie. JMHO

I will always dock tails....as long as the Yorkshire Terrier Club of America maintains the docking requirement in the standard. And anyone calling me to demand or even to ask for an undocked Yorkie will not get one of my dogs....period. Docking a tail is just that.....docking.....the tail at 3 or 4 days is cartiledge not bone. I've never seen any bad effects from the proper docking of a puppy tail. All of my pups just go back to nursing mamma with no ill affects. Now I do have a Yorkie with an undocked tail....she was way too tiny at even a week old to dock....so we just left it.....yes she is cute.
d

been on here reading all this and saying nothing, but now im going to, everyone must know that the yorkshire terrier comes from the uk were tail docking is now forbidden and rightly so, yes the reason they docked yorkie tails was because they were pulled from holes by there tails when they were working dogs, but as they arnt anymore there is no reason to dock the tail is there? yes my rosie digs holes but i wouldnt pull her by here tail and if i saw anyone doing it to a dog id have plenty to say.
i agree ear docking (i never new happened) and dew clawing should also be banned, id be most pissed if someone did it to me.
heres a pic of my rosie with her tail on show.


http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/6...500x3759eb.jpg

suz 11-29-2005 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkieRose
I think everyone here can agree to disagree. I will continue to dock tails until it is banned.
We circumsize baby boys and pierce baby girls ears..what is the difference?

PETA do more harm to animals then help them..it is a proven fact.

Funny...I was just thinking the same thing!! And if anyone has ever had a full grown dog get their dew-claws caught in something, and ripped off their legs, they'd understand why it is important to remove them!! Ear cropping is a no-no (JMO). I will continue to crop their tails until someone convinces me that it is harmful to them.

I do have a male thats tail is so sort, you don't even think he has a tail. My fault tho. I didn't tell the vet how long I wanted it cut. He does get some days of "The Poopy-Butt Syndrome", but a little soap and water does the trick. And when he wags his tail, it looks like he's wagging his little tush!!

Suz

Chelsey 11-29-2005 02:11 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Here are some random pics of my girls, here in Holland they have made it illegal to dock tails in 2000 - in Belgium the same law will go in 1st Jan. 2006

alisonJ 11-29-2005 03:36 AM

Platinum Yorkies--Your tone is very confrontational, sarcastic, and somewhat mean. :( I am bringing up a valid point, and from what I have found, most veterniarians agree with me. I am more apt to agree with vets than breeders. I will continue to bring up these issues and provide information as I find it. If you are offended by this, at least please keep your comments constructive.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168