![]() |
Quote:
What is amazing to me is that people will not take the time to go to website to educate themselves on these issues..but will try and debate them. How can anyone who stands for AKC pedigree's ignore these dogs. If you ignore these pedigree's then you have to ignore all of your Yorkie pedigree's. |
I had no idea the YTCA had that on their website. I can see why parti breeders would be upset. Any yorkie can have health problems if not bred and cared for properly. Even when breeding champion to champion problems can occur. |
If the post (sticky ) is what’s the difference between the Parti and the Biewer. The YTCA should not be added as a link. This is comparing tri colored dogs NOT tri colors vs. standard color. The Parti and Biewers sites have more then enough information if one wants to go look to see what the YTCA stance is (which we all know is to discredit the parti colors). YTCA should have it own sticky for those wanting to learn about the standard color. Heaven knows YTCA get enough plugging from others anytime a post go up when someone is looking for a dog. I do believe that when one refers a person to a YTCA members they should also include the fact that just because one belongs to the YTCA does not mean that all members of that club are ethical or reputable. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also since all the other links contain their version of the history of the Yorkshire terrier, the leading experts on the breed should be included. Whether you like it or not, the YTCA is the leading authority on the Yorkshire terrier. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only leading authority on the Yorkshire Terrier that I have seen is Joan Gordon...she is the one who did the research...it is her history that is posted on the YTCA website and how old is some of it....and now thanks to the internet people have the ability to see books and studbooks. Some of the history needs to be rewritten...just like a lot of our history books that are not telling the truth. Some of her history that is in her book has been totally ignored. Wow, so a show breeder that sells her dogs for $10,000 is only breeding for profit? You cannot generalize these statements..there are good Parti/Biewer/Yorkie breeders and there are poor Parti/Biewer/Yorkie breeders. Many are into making a profit and many want to write off their motorhome through their breeding programs to go to dog shows. Nothing is black & white. Some do care and work hard for their dogs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Some may care, but since they don't have the cost of shows, why the big markup? Just because they can? They are breeding a fault and marketing is as an asset. I see this as unethical. Also, so many sell with full breeding rights, as if every parti should be breed, and every pet owner should be a breeder. If any other breeder did this wouldn't you be upset? Organizations such as the HSUS and ASPCA both advocate adoption first, but say if that isn't possible we should only support breeders who are breeding to their breed's standard. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
but I don't know for sure.... Some may believe it was the egg./..... I agree, full circle with a lot of left turns and some extreme right turns..... :D In all seriousness, is there going to be a sticky, Ann??? |
The Difference in the Parti Yorkie and the Biewer As far back as we can trace the parti color has been in the Yorkshire Terrier. It is a recessive gene that can be explained very well at the Colorful Yorkie website. CYTC...Party Color Now as to the difference of the two parti colored dogs, From my tracing of pedigrees and speaking to numerous people. The Biewers started with Mr. Biewer purchasing a stud dog in 1975 from Streamglen Kennels, Streamglen Richard. Nikkos Kennels purchased a couple of females from Streamglen, One being Streamglen Milady. At the time Streamglen was producing Champion status yorkies and were selling yorkies across the world and the United States. Mr Biewer started breeding Ch. Streamglen Richard to all his Female Yorkshire Terriers trying to make his own mark by producing Champion quality yorkies that would come from his kennel. In his quest for champions, he did a lot of line and inbreeding. Then in January of 1984, a Parti colored Yorkshire Terrier was born from 2 of his Champion dogs line bred from Streamglen Richard. Darling and FruFru. On the other side of the ocean was Nikko’s Kennels were doing the exact same thing, breeding for Champion Yorkies. Nikkos purchased their Champion male(Ch. Quarnhill Fusspot) from Stoneybrook Kennels in 1971 and bred him to Streamglen Milady, the female they obtained from Streamglen Kennels. Nikkos then began producing Champion Yorkies and continued to line breed also. In the 80’s Parti colored Yorkies started showing up in Nikkos kennels also, Gloria couldn’t bear to put the pups down so she passed them out the back door as pets and told them not to say where they got them(her own words). Mr. Biewer did get his first ones registered with VDH but they designated them wrong color not for breeding, he wanted his adorable dogs to be shown so he went in search of a club that would accept them as a separate breed because they could not be shown as Yorkshire Terriers. The ACH was the first club to accept them as a distinct and separate breed. The dogs were then registered as Biewer Yorkshire A la Pon Pom. They originally had docked tails but Germany passed a law against docking so the tails then remained long. In the USA, others wanted theirs registered with AKC as they were out of registered dogs and they wanted the right color to be shown on the papers( Black , white and tan), so in 2000 after 18 months of DNA testing AKC accepted the Parti colored Yorkshire Terrier. During this time each went its own way in developing and registries. |
Quote:
I would like to keep it somewhat simple, yet informative. I don't feel it should be written by me, but rather by someone who has been involved deeply - as so many of you have been for quite a while now. The tough part there, is the differing angles/opinions. Another option is to have 2 or 3 people each contribute a post to the sticky. Or, MaryKay, like you said earlier (brilliantly :)) - just keep it extremely simple, descriptive, and provide some links to various sources for reading. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When I was new to YT, I happened upon a post about someones' Biewers. I looked at the pics and said WOW! I didn't ask about it on the forum though, I just followed links, read websites and looked at more pictures, and said WOW! some more. Found the BiewerTalk site, joined it, found other Biewer sites, etc I guess the point I am trying to make is, the debate about Biewers, Partis, where they came from, standards, etc etc has grown tremendously since I joined this site and probably will continue to stir debates and go off topic on any thread started with the word Parti or Biewer in it. A sticky with nothing more than links to the various Biewer and Parti club websites and a condensed short version of the physical/trait differences in the dogs is probably the fairest way to do it :) JMO oh, and maybe links to the various show venues that allow these breeds to be shown |
Quote:
Are those of you who do not have Biewers or partis even qualified to give input on this topic? |
Quote:
Them YTCA has nothing good to say about them. What would be the point of linking to their site? |
Quote:
~o~o~o~ William Wilberforce 1759-1833 ~o~o~o~ |
Nancy to educate is good, but the original post was about the difference between the two. We get you think the ytca should be in the sticky. Ok , can we now get back to the original question once again ? Please stop getting away from the original post........There are enough posts here for Ann to choose, we dont need to tell her for the 50th time to include the YTCA. |
Quote:
I don't have a problem posting the standard on YT without all the other comments that are made on the YTCA's website. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The YTCA is in total denial over rthe entire subject. |
Quote:
Would you really want to post a club who no longer says these dogs are Yorkies as someone suggested and who members here keep giving high signs to? I really am against a sticky because I believe people can learn so much by researching and they really need to come to their own conclusion. Plus we have tons of sticky's that people don't even read on many more important topics that people don't read and they still ask the same questions. Just my thoughts. |
Quote:
There are a lot of sites out there with misinformation on the subject. What people need is to be directed to the facts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use