| BamaFan121s | 06-04-2009 06:36 AM | Wow, my head is spinning after reading this thread! :eek:
Alot of my thoughts on the subject(s) discussed have already been laid out in detail...no need to hash them back out.
I don't agree with breeding tiny dogs, no matter how experiences you are. And to justify it by claiming that you are doing it to meet the public's demand for tinies is absolutly ridiculous. I'll be darned if I would ever put my dogs at risk just to supply the public with what they wanted. Typically, when people are wanting a "teacup or tiny", that indicates to me that they have done very little research on the breed. Seems like the most sensible option would be to help educate them on the subject, not subject dogs to unethical breeding practices to meet their demands.
Furthermore, I think that ALL dogs should be bred to be the best possible representation for their respective breeds...both standard and temperment. Why should focusing on those details be of importance ONLY with show dogs?
As far as the issue of picking on people's grammatical skills...I can completely understand the point that was trying to be made and agree. Ironically, it was stated several times that people only bring that up when they want to divert attention from the subject at hand. Hypocritcal, don't you think? Essentially, you are doing the same thing.
No, none of us are perfect and we ALL make spelling errors and typos. (I know because I have got to be one of the worst spellers to ever walk the planet!) But, generally speaking, people's perception of individuals IS partially based on how others conduct themselves...and that includes their basic grammer and the way they present themselves through speach, or in writing in our case here. If you think it's being judgemental, and claim you are not guilty of the same on some level, then you are seriously kidding yourself. |