![]() |
| |
|
Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #16 |
| BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Unfortunately, there are some people who will read that standard and think they don't have a yorkie because theirs is over 7 lbs or it has floppy ears or is not black and tan or whatever. Just because your yorkie does not have all the characterisitics set forth in the AKC breed standard does not mean you do not have a wonderful and beautiful and loveable dog. This standard is for those who breed to show their dogs and have set forth "their ideal" yorkie by coming up with this definition for the judges to use in judging in a dog show. It is by no means the end all of definitions for all yorkies as most do not fit this standard. If your yorkie has charactieristics that are different from the "standard", the show breeders call them "faults", but if they are not life threatening faults then they are of no consequece and it doesn't mean that you have some "inferior" version of the breed. It just means your dog would not win in the show ring. That is all. Show dogs are not superior in quality to non-show dogs in my opinion. |
| |
| Welcome Guest! | |
| | #17 | |
| Donating YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,042
| Quote:
I would imagine the breed standard was set to preserve the breed, and not as a guide to compare your yorkie against to determine if you in fact have a yorkie or not. I didnt post on this thread to debate, I am going to bed now. Good night Kim
__________________ Jennette Missy & Max | |
| |
| | #18 |
| BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Looks like we have all been fooled.... I found these previous posts by Sunkissed which show her obvious bias and knowledge of the YTCA and it's standard.... It doesn't sound like your 'in it' for the love of the breed either. Otherwise you'd realize that years & years of ethical breeder's hard work is going down the tubes by you breeding your yorkies. Breeding for the 'love of the breed' would be responsible breeding, not just throwing 2 yorkies together (that AREN'T even of standard) together and seeing what happens Wow, I couldn't have said it any better. I've only been on this forum for a few days now and I'm disturbed at all of the byb's I'm seeing around here. People breeding when they have NO CLUE as to what they're doing The YTCA is full of reputable breeders. I've also found the AKC's site for breeder classifieds to be helpful. Here are the links: http://www.ytca.org/breeder3.html http://www.akc.org/classified/search/index.cfm I for one do not appreciate you coming on here and posting a sarcastic thread such as you have done and "playing games" with the kind natures of the members here! This is just not right! |
| |
| | #19 | |
| Tinkerbell, My Little Flutterpup Donating Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Beautiful California!
Posts: 6,112
| Quote:
Exactly... I posted my comment only after I read her previous posts. I had not meant to be rude, but it was pretty obvious her intentions with this post. It was not I who needed the hand slapping... Last edited by chloeandj; 08-15-2005 at 10:52 PM. | |
| |
| | #20 |
| YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: seaside,ca
Posts: 1,763
| OH MY GOD!!! kim thanks for pointing that out to us. i for one did not read her other post therefore was fooled
__________________ |
| |
| | #21 | |
| BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Quote:
How sad. Truly! | |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart