Yorkshire Terrier Club of Ethical Hobby Breeders

[yorkiekist]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

2 ? What are you baseing that on, the actual sites or the photo album?

actual sites

[Breezeaway]

Wow out of 65 sites only 2? We know your agenda its written all over your website.
How come you don't have photos of your dogs on your site?

[yorkiekist]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

Wow out of 65 sites only 2? We know your agenda its written all over your website.
How come you don't have photos of your dogs on your site?

I dont have an agenda on my web-site. Just telling it like it is.

I dont have alot of photos because I cant take great pictures. I have tried and tried with my cameras but with the shutter lag, it seems the dogs move and I keep getting the back of the head shots or end of the tail shots. But, as my site says, it is under construction.

The tiny puppies are the only ones I could get to hold still!!!LOL Great pictures of them.

[Breezeaway]

Exactly, nice photos are hard to get so don't judge a dog by a photo.
You dont seem to have problem taking pics of your goats, chickens, horse and cat.

[yorkiekist]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

Exactly, nice photos are hard to get so don't judge a dog by a photo.
You dont seem to have problem taking pics of your goats, chickens, horse and cat.

You dont know how many pictures I had to take of them.lol Besides, I am not having to beg someone come over and help me take pictures of them. I like professional type pictures of my dogs on my site, not back yard pictures of horses, chickens and goats. Like I said, my site isnt done yet.

OK, the parti dogs in the pictures I saw, any dog fancier can tell they are substandard. I dont care if they are stacked or not. This type of bad structure cant be hidden.

[Woogie Man]

I have a couple of questions regarding the partis. Since this discussion has largely been about getting partis into the ring, I was wondering just what partis are we talking about? From a little looking around, I'm finding partis, golden partis, chocolate partis, chocolate/golden partis and blonde partis. It really seems like every variation of off-color dog is being bred together. Would those advocating for a color variation in the breed standard want to allow for all these varieties, and those yet to come? Do we now need the term 'traditional parti'?

Also, I saw the pedigree posted with the Hylan's dog. I thought I had seen earlier that all parti's could be traced back to the Nikko's line. There's also a breeder on the CYTC website that claims to have a parti that's no relation to either of these lines. Very confusing...

[bchgirl]

I browsed those sites yesterday and I imagine quite a few people have.

[Breezeaway]

Not all partis come from the Nikkos line, but Nikkos is the most popular and well know.. Gloria is the one who who owned them and got them into AKC.

[Woogie Man]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

Not all partis come from the Nikkos line, but Nikkos is the most popular and well know.. Gloria is the one who who owned them and got them into AKC.

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was someone that had bought one of her dogs and not Ms. Lipman that got the ball rolling on that.

Do you have any opinion on the many varieties of partis now being bred and whether any hypothetical color variation in the standard should include them?

Also, as a 'heads up', there is a member of the CYTC that is advertising that they specialize in "teacups".

[yorkiekist]

Originally Posted by Woogie Man

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was someone that had bought one of her dogs and not Ms. Lipman that got the ball rolling on that.

Do you have any opinion on the many varieties of partis now being bred and whether any hypothetical color variation in the standard should include them?

Also, as a 'heads up', there is a member of the CYTC that is advertising that they specialize in "teacups".

Hmmmm, and the members of this club love to critisize the YTCA and its members.

[Breezeaway]

Originally Posted by Woogie Man

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought it was someone that had bought one of her dogs and not Ms. Lipman that got the ball rolling on that.

Do you have any opinion on the many varieties of partis now being bred and whether any hypothetical color variation in the standard should include them?

Also, as a 'heads up', there is a member of the CYTC that is advertising that they specialize in "teacups".

I have asked over and over for my name to be removed from the CYTC website. I am not a member and have no say in what they do or do not advocate.
Yes Loren helped get it started but Gloria is the one who had to have it done, she paid the price.

[Woogie Man]

Originally Posted by yorkiekist

Hmmmm, and the members of this club love to critisize the YTCA and its members.

It could well be an oversight, but it is there. It runs counter to the posted code of ethics, however, and I'm sure the club would want to know about it.

[Woogie Man]

Originally Posted by Breezeaway

I have asked over and over for my name to be removed from the CYTC website. I am not a member and have no say in what they do or do not advocate.
Yes Loren helped get it started but Gloria is the one who had to have it done, she paid the price.

Understood about you and the CYTC. That part of my post (about the teacups) was more directed to the club's founders. If you would care to answer as an individual, do you have an opinion on the variations of the parti now being bred? I would think if a standard variation is pursued, at some point it will have to be clarified as to what varieties of dogs would be included in any proposed change.

[Breezeaway]

Yes it would have to be more clarified.

[Breezeaway]

Yes i do have my own opinion on the variations, but right now i keep that to myself.