YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community

YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Breeder Talk (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/breeder-talk/)
-   -   Yorkshire Terrier Club of Ethical Hobby Breeders (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/breeder-talk/208797-yorkshire-terrier-club-ethical-hobby-breeders.html)

chachi 07-25-2010 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213288)
Maybe the YTCA does need to change some standards instead of staying close minded. As it stands the Yorkie certainly isn't doing any winning in best in show at Westminster, How long has it been?
IMO Because they dont have that look that just pops, The Partis on the other hand do turn heads.

You dont think a beautiful standard yorkie turns heads??? I hate to tell you this some of us prefer the look of the standard yorkies over the partis

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 06:34 AM

I plan on showing After August, right now my job prevents me from traveling and the shows are pretty far away.
My job will be over in August. Then I can devote to showing.

Woogie Man 07-25-2010 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gemy (Post 3213202)
Look for well-filled forechests; hollow, narrow forechests revealed in front legs that do not allow you to easily get a hand comfortably between them is a serious fault

A handspan varies widely from person to person. Is there a more precise analogy that could be used.

I think the illustration farther down the page (that of the foreleg/front assembly) is more revealing than the explanation. The spring of the chest will affect the stance and gait of the dog and will show at the front. I've heard the term 'well sprung rib' used before, too. I take it to mean not a barrel chest but not a narrow chest either.

I realize this site is one person's opinion, but feel it's helpful for those trying to do an evaluation of their dogs, or a dog they may be considering, from a judge's perspective.

Lorraine 07-25-2010 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chachi (Post 3213297)
You dont think a beautiful standard yorkie turns heads??? I hate to tell you this some of us prefer the look of the standard yorkies over the partis

:thumbup::thumbup: I personally do not like the look of the parti or Beiwer either. According to reports from the Biewer group that did DNA testing to find out the genetics of the Biewer, it was found there is very little Yorkie genes in them. They are the result ofgetting a mix in there. You think that didn't happen in the partis? Guess again!
YTCA doesn't want to change the standard to allow partis because they aren't yorkies and do not fit the breed standard for colour.
Call them something else and go through all the work,money, years, dedication it takes to have a new breed recognized. That would not bother anyone instead of trying to ride on the tail of an established breed so you can market them for big bucks as rare.
Here in Canada, there was a problem with some wanting Merle chihuahuas recognized. The Chi club of Canada worked very hard to not only have them not in the show rings, it has just been passed taht a merle Chi cannot be registered regardless of the registration of sire and dam.
A reputable breeder of any purebred dog and their parent club will protect that breed all they possibly can.

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 06:53 AM

The Mars testing that was done on the Biewers was done by BTCA and we all know that they obviously had mixes so they could get into AKC as a separate breed. My partis were DNA'd and it came back 100% Yorkshire Terriers, The Parti's are Yorkshire Terriers no matter what YOU think.
They are DNA'd, And AKC registered. The Parti is also registered in Canada

Woogie Man 07-25-2010 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorraine (Post 3213308)
According to reports from the Biewer group that did DNA testing to find out the genetics of the Biewer, it was found there is very little Yorkie genes in them. They are the result ofgetting a mix in there. You think that didn't happen in the partis? Guess again!
YTCA doesn't want to change the standard to allow partis because they aren't yorkies and do not fit the breed standard for colour.
Call them something else and go through all the work,money, years, dedication it takes to have a new breed recognized. That would not bother anyone instead of trying to ride on the tail of an established breed so you can market them for big bucks as rare.

I've seen this sentiment echoed on other forums. As for the AKC's DNA testing on the Partis, wouldn't that just prove parentage and say nothing about the breed purity of the dogs?

I think the bottom line is that a Yorkshire Terrier is a blue and tan/gold dog....period. Historical mentions of off-colored dogs and a registry's DNA profiling to prove parentage will not sway the parent club.

gemy 07-25-2010 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3213307)
I think the illustration farther down the page (that of the foreleg/front assembly) is more revealing than the explanation. The spring of the chest will affect the stance and gait of the dog and will show at the front. I've heard the term 'well sprung rib' used before, too. I take it to mean not a barrel chest but not a narrow chest either.

I realize this site is one person's opinion, but feel it's helpful for those trying to do an evaluation of their dogs, or a dog they may be considering, from a judge's perspective.

thanks for your reply. I found this very informative, I do have a copy of the illustrated standard, I think though it was issued a long time ago. It is good to know what is being taught at judging seminars. I know when I participated doing ours, the one thing I was asked to do was share with the judges what the breed experts are looking for when they watch and share information ringside.

maggiesmom_2007 07-25-2010 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3213316)
I've seen this sentiment echoed on other forums. As for the AKC's DNA testing on the Partis, wouldn't that just prove parentage and say nothing about the breed purity of the dogs?

I think the bottom line is that a Yorkshire Terrier is a blue and tan/gold dog....period. Historical mentions of off-colored dogs and a registry's DNA profiling to prove parentage will not sway the parent club.


That is a valid point And Question. Would love to see the reply.

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 07:06 AM

Mine were Mars tested and came back Yorkshire terrier, no mix. The BTCA biewers came back mixed breeds.

chachi 07-25-2010 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213326)
Mine were Mars tested and came back Yorkshire terrier, no mix. The BTCA biewers came back mixed breeds.

Can you scan and post the results?

Elle 07-25-2010 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magicgenie (Post 3213217)
This bickering like old biddies is making my brain bleed, but I have a question for Elle: Have I not seen you on YT more than once referring puppy buyers to the web site, www.yorkies.com, for a breeder directory and information on specific breeders the owner of that site doesn't like? YTCEHB has an actual process with published rules and regulations and a committee for approving members, so how is that a bad thing in your mind? Does this not sound like a much safer and more reliable resource than a list assembled by one person acting alone?


http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/bre...e-johnson.html

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 07:22 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Heres Nicholas' results

chachi 07-25-2010 07:43 AM

How come it only goes back 3 generations? Thanks for posting that

Elle 07-25-2010 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213288)
Maybe the YTCA does need to change some standards instead of staying close minded. As it stands the Yorkie certainly isn't doing any winning in best in show at Westminster, How long has it been?
IMO Because they dont have that look that just pops, The Partis on the other hand do turn heads.


32 years ago. Cede Higgins. Has the chinese crested ever won? It pops. So does the old english sheepdog.

Lorraine 07-25-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elle (Post 3213360)
32 years ago. Cede Higgins. Has the chinese crested ever won? It pops. So does the old english sheepdog.

And many other breeds. Sporting dogs and the real flashy breeds are usually the ones in the BIS winners for Westminster.

Lorraine 07-25-2010 07:58 AM

Genetics are way more complicated than you think. The Mars test may have shown your dog as pure yorkie although it is parti colour. Not sure how that works when the yorkie does not carry the pie bald gene to produce that pattern. Interesting isn't it?
So if the mix is dilute enough would Mars show a purebred? Dilute meaning the mix occured many generations ago but that gene to create the colour pattern is still carried forward.
I still have no idea why anyone would purposely set out to wreck a breed that is so not the breed standard.
There are wrong colours in other breeds that will not ever be recognized by the parent club. Black and white German Shorhairs pointers for example are a fault and are not recognized nor bred for. They are sold for pet if one turns up.
Why the yorkie ended up being targeted to try to destroy the breed is beyond my understanding.

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 08:02 AM

So you don't consider the yorkie flashy enough to be in the BIS?

topknot 07-25-2010 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorraine (Post 3213374)
Genetics are way more complicated than you think. The Mars test may have shown your dog as pure yorkie although it is parti colour. Not sure how that works when the yorkie does not carry the pie bald gene to produce that pattern. Interesting isn't it?
So if the mix is dilute enough would Mars show a purebred? Dilute meaning the mix occured many generations ago but that gene to create the colour pattern is still carried forward....

The Mars testing was dicussed here last year... http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/bre...-accuracy.html

Woogie Man 07-25-2010 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213344)
Heres Nicholas' results

In Mars' own words...."While Wisdom Panel Insights is not designed as a pure bred test our results indicate that St. Nicholas' recent ancestry only includes Yorkshire Terrier".

So you have AKC's DNA profile proving parentage only and the Mars test (with the above highlighted qualifiers). Do you really feel that is enough to sway the parent club? Unless a test comes along establishing breed purity, I don't think there's enough there to convince the parent club to allow Partis in.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"The genetic makeup for the Yorkshire Terrier is:

asasBBCCDDEEGGmmSStt

S Self colour to totally pigmented surface si Irish spotting involving a few definite areas of white sp Piebald spotting sw Extreme-white piebald

Most breeds without white markings are SS but from time to time markings do appear and in general appear on toes, chest or muzzle. These marks can be present at birth and are lost during infancy. The ones that persist are not other s alleles but to minus modifiers at the S allele and will be limited to those minute amounts in those locations.

Irish spotting is also limited to certain areas of the body as the dominant S is, ruling out either gene in the makeup of Parti Yorkie Tri Colors or Biewers. Limited to forehead, chest, belly, feet and tail tip.

Piebald shows much larger amounts of white on the dogs then the Irish spotting gene.

Extreme-white piebald is seen in those breeds which are white in color. As a result of this double carrier of swsw all other colors can be suppressed. (From Malcolm Willis "Genetics of the Dog")

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 08:06 AM

Destroy the breed? Have you looked at all the Puppymills with yorkies. They are the ones destroying the Yorkie.
The Partis are not trying to destroy the breed they just want a separate color variation.
I am carefully choosing what I am breeding, I am not breeding trash out to destroy the yorkie.

gardenyorkies 07-25-2010 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorraine (Post 3213374)
Genetics are way more complicated than you think. The Mars test may have shown your dog as pure yorkie although it is parti colour. Not sure how that works when the yorkie does not carry the pie bald gene to produce that pattern. Interesting isn't it?
So if the mix is dilute enough would Mars show a purebred? Dilute meaning the mix occured many generations ago but that gene to create the colour pattern is still carried forward.
I still have no idea why anyone would purposely set out to wreck a breed that is so not the breed standard.
There are wrong colours in other breeds that will not ever be recognized by the parent club. Black and white German Shorhairs pointers for example are a fault and are not recognized nor bred for. They are sold for pet if one turns up.
Why the yorkie ended up being targeted to try to destroy the breed is beyond my understanding.

Very well Said Lorraine!

Elle 07-25-2010 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gemy (Post 3213318)
thanks for your reply. I found this very informative, I do have a copy of the illustrated standard, I think though it was issued a long time ago. It is good to know what is being taught at judging seminars. I know when I participated doing ours, the one thing I was asked to do was share with the judges what the breed experts are looking for when they watch and share information ringside.

I don't think Carolyn is doing seminars.

Elle 07-25-2010 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorraine (Post 3213308)
:thumbup::thumbup: I personally do not like the look of the parti or Beiwer either. According to reports from the Biewer group that did DNA testing to find out the genetics of the Biewer, it was found there is very little Yorkie genes in them. They are the result ofgetting a mix in there. You think that didn't happen in the partis? Guess again!
YTCA doesn't want to change the standard to allow partis because they aren't yorkies and do not fit the breed standard for colour.
Call them something else and go through all the work,money, years, dedication it takes to have a new breed recognized. That would not bother anyone instead of trying to ride on the tail of an established breed so you can market them for big bucks as rare.
Here in Canada, there was a problem with some wanting Merle chihuahuas recognized. The Chi club of Canada worked very hard to not only have them not in the show rings, it has just been passed taht a merle Chi cannot be registered regardless of the registration of sire and dam.
A reputable breeder of any purebred dog and their parent club will protect that breed all they possibly can.


Absolutely!

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 09:10 AM

Merles dont pertain to yorkies so that point is mute. The merling gene is whole different thing.

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 09:18 AM

Because the YTCA will not even discuss with the parti people a way to try make both sides happy nothing will ever get resolved. More and more carriers will just start showing in the ring, its inevitable and over time most of your yorkies will carry the parti gene, if they dont already. The only way to keep them separated is to give them their own standard and class.
So why not talk with us and try to get it sorted out so we can have our own variety and you can keep your standard as is.
No one ever gets anywhere if they wont even talk about it.

Elle 07-25-2010 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213444)
Merles dont pertain to yorkies so that point is mute. The merling gene is whole different thing.

It's exactly the same.

maggiesmom_2007 07-25-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3213453)
Because the YTCA will not even discuss with the parti people a way to try make both sides happy nothing will ever get resolved. More and more carriers will just start showing in the ring, its inevitable and over time most of your yorkies will carry the parti gene, if they dont already. The only way to keep them separated is to give them their own standard and class.
So why not talk with us and try to get it sorted out so we can have our own variety and you can keep your standard as is.
No one ever gets anywhere if they wont even talk about it.


Well I can say this with Absolute conviction. None of my Yorkies have this Parti Gene and they never will. So for you to make that type of statement is basically a bunch of Hogwash. Oh and The breeders I associate with also do not have the Parti gene in their lines either.

Breezeaway 07-25-2010 10:30 AM

Of course I dont know what lines your dogs have but I do know some of the big names do have it in their lines.
There were parti pups born from the sire Ch Hylan Acres Ridin the Storm and a daughter of Ch. Durrers Mighty Obsession.
Durrers Ace High goes back to Finstal Icing and Finstal goes back to Streamglen Shaun, the same line some of the partis come from. HMMM

maggiesmom_2007 07-25-2010 10:36 AM

Guess it's good that none of those dogs are in my dogs peds then huh.

chachi 07-25-2010 10:43 AM

I think what shes saying is their will be more parti carrier in the ring in the future and more parti carriers bred to yortkies in the future so the gene pool will be diluted in the future


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168