YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community

YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Breeder Talk (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/breeder-talk/)
-   -   I want a Biewer/parti yorkie (https://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/breeder-talk/197190-i-want-biewer-parti-yorkie.html)

Brooklynn 02-26-2010 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3019354)
Donna, you've always been crystal clear in your thoughts on breeding. I hope you don't refrain from comments about what you look for and try to achieve with your breeding program. It's very enlightening and I'm sure I'm not the only one that really appreciates them.

Jim

Thank you Jim! I won't refrain from comments on the yorkie standard breed but will from now on try and stay off the Parti issue as I will continue to disagree with until the standard changes :)
I'd rather stay friends with my one and only Parti friend so I will refrain from the Parti issue as I like Tammy and do not want to hurt her feelings. :)

Donna

Nancy1999 02-26-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3019289)
Nancy, I know it's sometimes hard to decipher a person's true meaning from typed words, but you seem to infer that Mr. Biewer somehow was more honorable in his development of the Biewer than Parti breeders. I don't see how you can say he 'wasn't just breeding for pets' as the Biewer could not be shown and he even had to shop around for a registry to paper them with. Also, in an earlier post, you mentioned something about parti breeders inbreeding and that you wouldn't recommend them. Just how do you think Mr. Biewer was able to develop his dogs without intensive in-breeding? He started out with only 2 and that was only in the 1980's. You just can't here from there without in-breeding.

I think the Biewer is a lovely dog, but honestly, the more I find out about them, the more confused I am. They either are/are not a Yorkshire Terrier; you either breed them with Yorkies or not..very confusing. I guess it will be some time before there's a shake out and things get set for the breed. In any case, they aren't recognized by AKC and, if I remember correctly, have been determined to be a mixed breed by at least one German registry.

I just say that in contrast to the Parti, which has been determined to be a Yorkie, has been around for many years, and is recognized by AKC. This is what makes your post puzzling.

I would just like to see both Parti and Biewer breeders take their breedings seriously and develop long term goals. I think some are doing so, and that's a good thing for any breed. I have seen one Parti breeder here (kpstoybox I think) mention more than once that the parti is not yet where they want it to be in quality and will take some time. Statements like that indicate that a breeder has both goals and a critical eye....absolute necessities in a breeding program.

I don't think any of us traditional Yorkie breeders are going to dissuade Parti and Biewer breeders. They certainly don't need my blessing to continue. I will just wish them well in their endeavors, different as they may be from mine.

I really get tired of this back and forth every time a Parti or Biewer thread pops up. I remember the thread where Tammy was having such trouble with Livi and her pups and folks came together then to offer help, regardless of their breeding program. I'd just like to see more of that spirit here than continually beating a long-dead horse.

I can't comment too much on Mr. Biewer, it depends whom you read on the information you get, not too many Biewer clubs agree on the same thing. My point is that he did seem to have a goal in mind, perhaps he was just a parti breeder, but from what I've read, he seemed to have a goal beyond breeding pets. I do believe some Biewer breeders have a goal beyond this as well, perhaps some parti breeders do too. There are some very interesting things I've read about the differences between Biewers and Yorkies, and who knows if these differences will prove to be true. You are correct that Mr. Biewer did do lots of inbreeding, and from my understanding some of the Biewer clubs, are very aware of the health risks, and do keep each other informed of some of ways to handle it, and test for it. That's why clubs that really are looking toward a future can be helpful, breeders who are breeding for the right reasons, are going to be honest in the things they learn, and not try to keep things hidden, because it will destroy their line. I agree with your comment:

Quote:

I have seen one Parti breeder here (kpstoybox I think) mention more than once that the parti is not yet where they want it to be in quality and will take some time. Statements like that indicate that a breeder has both goals and a critical eye....absolute necessities in a breeding program.
You are not sure which breeder made the comment, but I agree the comment is a good one. I just see too many "carrier" pups pushed as breeders, and they have no other qualities besides being a carrier. I do not think a breeder should breed something out of standard to make her "colors pop". It literally makes me sick when I read something like that. I wish it didn't bother me.

Concerning beating a dead horse, we are constantly getting new members, lots of people joining every day, who know nothing about qualities to look for in a breeder and why breeding to standard is important, or even why you shouldn't breed your pet dog. I know when I joined Yorkietalk I read hundreds of threads before I ever posted on a thread, for most people there's no reason to post; they can get lots information by reading. If you believe you are beating a dead horse, than of course you shouldn't post, but I certainly don't think I'm beating a dead horse. All I can say, is that I'm so thankful, there were a few people here before I joined, and who weren't afraid of beating that proverbial dead horse.

Woogie Man 02-26-2010 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3019380)
Concerning beating a dead horse, we are constantly getting new members, lots of people joining every day, who know nothing about qualities to look for in a breeder and why breeding to standard is important, or even why you shouldn't breed your pet dog. I know when I joined Yorkietalk I read hundreds of threads before I ever posted on a thread, for most people there's no reason to post; they can get lots information by reading. If you believe you are beating a dead horse, than of course you shouldn't post, but I certainly don't think I'm beating a dead horse. All I can say, is that I'm so thankful, there were a few people here before I joined, and who weren't afraid of beating that proverbial dead horse.

You're right about the new member thing. My point is that we should all be trying to promote good breeding practices, whether traditional, parti, or Biewer. Some will never see eye to eye on the whole parti/Biewer issue, but we can all agree on sound breeding practices, whatever our interests. There's no purpose served by re-hashing old squabbles and most of these threads get bogged down in just that.

puppylove11 02-26-2010 02:11 PM

Donna I can tell by your post how important the quality of your dogs are and I do have a high respect for you.

Nancy I am happy your purchase from a YTCA member was great! On the other hand mine was not. There are good and bad in every avenue of life including the YTCA.

The most important responsibility a breeder has is the care of their dogs and secondly is the health of their puppies, color and everything else comes in after those issues.

Nancy1999 02-26-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3019392)
You're right about the new member thing. My point is that we should all be trying to promote good breeding practices, whether traditional, parti, or Biewer. Some will never see eye to eye on the whole parti/Biewer issue, but we can all agree on sound breeding practices, whatever our interests. There's no purpose served by re-hashing old squabbles and most of these threads get bogged down in just that.

I really do try to that, I'm a little disappointed that you haven't recognized that fact. A very small percentage of my posts involve parti threads.

evab 02-26-2010 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3019212)
Hi and welcome to Yorkietalk, from what I understand all the Parti's can be traced back to one line. Even the Biewer, developed in Germany, has been said to be linked to this line. I guess Mr. Biewer may have been a Parti breeder, but he seemed to take it very seriously, and wasn't just breeding pets, he had a vision and he developed a standard. After his death, the breed almost died out, but American interest brought it back to life. There are many breeders breeding the Biewer in America, and different clubs with different agendas, some believe that there is no difference between the Biewer and the Parti, and even mate the two together. Others believe that there are huge differences, and it's best to keep the lines pure. I believe that there are huge differences in the breeders and their motivations for breeding. So perhaps you know the parti as a Biewer?

Hi Nancy, thanks for the kind welcome...yes I understand about the Biewer and the Uk breeding lines. I have been looking into Biewer History for some months now, but didn't find anything mentioned about the parti until I went on another forum, it's been quite an experience in the last few weeks...firstly learning about how forums work.....as I'm blonde! and the fact that I had never been on US forums before....but I'm here now....I have found the comments to be very interesting and obviously mixed opinions....:confused:

evab 02-26-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3019232)
OH PLEASEEEE, evab, you have posted all over another site and you even posted your website which has stolen photos on it. Some of them are mine.
PARTI COLOURED YORKIE TERRIER her website

Oh hello, Deb I see you have your usual vigour.... I have only been on one other site, and joined some 2 weeks ago....as you are more then aware the site you have mentioned here is not mine..I live in the UK why would I have a parti colured yorkie terrier site, when we don't have them in UK...If you have problems with this site take it up with them. But I have been on your site recently and thank you for removing the incorrect info you had on your about Nikko's Rolls Royce Ashley as being a winner of Best in Breed at CRUFTS. I hope you did not mind my telling you this...but feel it only fair that where ever possible the correct info should be given. As the UK Kennel Club do not recognise the parti colour in the UK and as we do not have that colour dog anywhere in the UK, I thought it quite strange when I read your History. but once the UK KC confirmed they had never heard of the Nikko's breeding line ever in the UK, I just had to let you know.

evab 02-26-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evab (Post 3019417)
Hi Nancy, thanks for the kind welcome...yes I understand about the Biewer and the Uk breeding lines. I have been looking into Biewer History for some months now, but didn't find anything mentioned about the parti until I went on another forum, it's been quite an experience in the last few weeks...firstly learning about how forums work.....as I'm blonde! and the fact that I had never been on US forums before....but I'm here now....I have found the comments to be very interesting and obviously mixed opinions....:confused:

I am unable to reply to a posting by Lowoodfarm, as I have already gone to the administrator..how can this be I have only been on this forum for one message????

so post my reply here.: I do not have a web site: Parti Yorkie Terrier, we do not have them in the UK. so if you have a prob Deb take it up with them.... I merely informed you on that site that you had put incorrect info on your web sire about Nikko's Rolls Royce Ashley ever winning crufts, which I now see you have changed.

gemy 02-26-2010 03:00 PM

I have read this thread with interest. As just a fancier of Yorkies and not a breeder I have a few comments.

First there is a lot of passion on this thread which I feel is very very good. Passion is indicative of strongly held beliefs, and for many posts, that was articulated in a reasoned and critical way.

I would hope that the ethical breeders of Standard Yorkies, work very closely to promote a harmonious relationship with the ethical breeders of Parti=Yorkies. You would want to promote the testing of parti's for all the tests that the ethical breeders of standard yorkies do. Why? quite simply it may lead the way into more understanding of the health problems of standard Yorkies. What if all BATS results were collected and delineated between Yorkie standard color and Parti color. And there was a statistically relevant deviation between the two? What if LP was again statistically less in Standard vs Parti?
the fact remains there seems to be dedicated and passionate folks breeding Parti's they are here to stay! So maybe one day the standard will be changed .... After all in many breeds of dogs there are different colours they compete under.

To me while I love the standard color of Yorkies ( I do own a standard Yorkie) if Partis show all the same characteristics of Yorky standards with no greater health concerns, then one day maybe the US Club will need to acknowledge and recognize this.

IMHO change will always happen and should... Colour is Just colour unless colour also is indicative of other health concerns... ie some breeds white = higher propensity to deafness. In fact on the subject of light blue .. the YCTA's illustrated standard mentions that light blue is important in the breed... and the breeders know why... Unfortunately the authors decided not to publish why this is important, this deliberate omission is I very interesting.

Breny 02-26-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogie Man (Post 3019392)
My point is that we should all be trying to promote good breeding practices, whether traditional, parti, or Biewer. Some will never see eye to eye on the whole parti/Biewer issue, but we can all agree on sound breeding practices, whatever our interests. There's no purpose served by re-hashing old squabbles and most of these threads get bogged down in just that.

Great post Jim :thumbup: Well said.

Dixies Mom 02-26-2010 03:18 PM

I have read many posts about the Biewer and the Parti. My question to you all is... Do you think the Yorkshire Terrier is the only breed that has had a mutating color gene?
13 years ago I met a wonderful breeder that I purchased my first German Shepherd from. Approximately 10 years ago, she breed her tradional male with a black female and produce the first tri-color German Shepherd now known as the Panda Shepherd. When this happened my friend was judged ridiculed and treated very badly for her breeding practices. She held her ground and began working with a genetist and was able to prove her dogs were pure and the gene was isolated and was found to have came from her tradional male. She has been a guardian of her colorful Shepherds and has every litter DNA to see which pup carries the gene and is very selective as to the placement. I have since purchased another boy from her, his mother is a Panda Shepherd and his father is a tradional. My boy is a tradional and does not carry the Panda gene.
I am not as of yet, an expert when it comes to the Biewer Terrier however, I know that through DNA studies Mr. Biewer was enhancing his "color lines" with other breeds. I can only speculate why because he is not here to tell us but I believe he was trying to produce color and specific looks using the Yorkies as the foundation.
I believe as far as the Parti Yorkie as with the Panda Shepherd, the dog will either carry the gene or it won't. To the OP... the only way you will know is to contact a genesist. If you breed a parti into your lines you may or may not have a baby who will carry the gene.

yorkiegirl2 02-26-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evab (Post 3019453)
I am unable to reply to a posting by Lowoodfarm, as I have already gone to the administrator..how can this be I have only been on this forum for one message????

so post my reply here.: I do not have a web site: Parti Yorkie Terrier, we do not have them in the UK. so if you have a prob Deb take it up with them.... I merely informed you on that site that you had put incorrect info on your web sire about Nikko's Rolls Royce Ashley ever winning crufts, which I now see you have changed.

If we make a mistake with infomation we will correct it.
You could have contacted us about the error.
But instead you choose to berate and steal pictures that do not belong to you and used them without permission.
I hope you have corrected this and removed the pictures.
This board frowns on people who conducts themselves in this manner.

Nancy1999 02-26-2010 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkiegirl2 (Post 3019512)
If we make a mistake with infomation we will correct it.
You could have contacted us about the error.
But instead you choose to berate and steal pictures that do not belong to you and used them without permission.
I hope you have corrected this and removed the pictures.
This board frowns on people who conducts themselves in this manner.

I think she's trying to say that the website Breezeaway linked is not her website.

She says,
Quote:

I do not have a web site: Parti Yorkie Terrier, we do not have them in the UK. so if you have a prob Deb take it up with them.... I merely informed you on that site that you had put incorrect info on your web sire about Nikko's Rolls Royce Ashley ever winning crufts, which I now see you have changed.

Breezeaway 02-26-2010 03:54 PM

It is her site, she is saying she is merely informing us on that site , that its not a website its to inform.

AMD 02-26-2010 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TammyJM (Post 3019328)
Thanks Donna ;)
[snip]

I know that there are people within this thread that do not breed the standard 100% of the time...I will not name names...I like and respect these people. But can we please agree that one picking and choosing what rules they will follow are no better/worse than those of that breed the parti....no matter how you justify it! Do not preach at us for not following the standard if you are not willing to follow your own words, each and every breeding. I do not care why you say that you do it....I am tired of reading that they are doing it to enhance the color (or whatever reason is being used). You are still breeding an off-color yourself. Heck, I could say..."I am breeding my Livi to pass on her dead-on perfect topline". I am still breeding an off-color, right?? So why do you, the ones that are saying that we are wrong, get to state your reasons for breeding the colors that you want, but we are the ones that are attacked??[snip]



Tammy first of all...I respect you as a person, and your beliefs.
The biggest issue, as I see it, is GOALS. There is a difference between breeding a parti and "off-blue" coloring to produce a correctly blue colored dog. To begin, nobody can breed a perfect dog because it doesn't exist; whether you're breeding standard color or a Parti, there's always faults. But those who are trying to ACHIEVE the correct "blue and tan" color may breed a dog "not to standard" but it's their GOAL to produce the perfect color that is the issue. As a parti breeder I can see how that seems comfusing or like a double standard, but it's more than the single dog's phenotype (appearence) that determines the color of offspring. They say it's wrong for you to breed a Parti, and you say their coloring is not "perfect" either...but your *goals* are on opposite ends of the stick. Now if a light blue dog is bred without intention to correct it to dark steel blue, then yes, they're both not the "standard correct" color. (Does that make sense?) Also what is "dark steel blue" to one, may be too light to another. I'm not saying it's always right to breed a too dark or too light coat, but it's a big picture, and more than phenotype. You always have to look at the genetics and decide if your 'not to standard' colored dog matched with the sire/dam will PRODUCE the correct "blue and tan" that the standard calls for. Whereas partis are bred to PRODUCE that white tri-color, which is a fault according to standard. Hope that makes sense.
So in your case, you could breed two traditional colord dogs and still produce a tri-colored offspring. Both parents would have the recessive gene required, but they're not parti colored. You might be blamed for not breeding "correct parti color", but you're breeding two traditionals to PRODUCE parti colored offspring, which is your goal.
I think we must always remember that NO dog is perfect, and we always have to live with some faults and decide which ones are not acceptable. There will always be disreputable breeders breeding wrong size, wrong health, wrong heads, wrong color, wrong *whatever*, but we all should be seeking and encouraging ethical breeding practices in EVERY breeding program, with the end purpose of BETTERING THE BREED. Friends can agree to disagree and remain friends.:D



Gosh, that was a lot longer than I meant, sorry. :p

Pinehaven 02-26-2010 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dixies Mom (Post 3019491)
I have read many posts about the Biewer and the Parti. My question to you all is... Do you think the Yorkshire Terrier is the only breed that has had a mutating color gene?
13 years ago I met a wonderful breeder that I purchased my first German Shepherd from. Approximately 10 years ago, she breed her tradional male with a black female and produce the first tri-color German Shepherd now known as the Panda Shepherd. When this happened my friend was judged ridiculed and treated very badly for her breeding practices. She held her ground and began working with a genetist and was able to prove her dogs were pure and the gene was isolated and was found to have came from her tradional male. She has been a guardian of her colorful Shepherds and has every litter DNA to see which pup carries the gene and is very selective as to the placement. I have since purchased another boy from her, his mother is a Panda Shepherd and his father is a tradional. My boy is a tradional and does not carry the Panda gene.
I am not as of yet, an expert when it comes to the Biewer Terrier however, I know that through DNA studies Mr. Biewer was enhancing his "color lines" with other breeds. I can only speculate why because he is not here to tell us but I believe he was trying to produce color and specific looks using the Yorkies as the foundation.
I believe as far as the Parti Yorkie as with the Panda Shepherd, the dog will either carry the gene or it won't. To the OP... the only way you will know is to contact a genesist. If you breed a parti into your lines you may or may not have a baby who will carry the gene.


I know nothing about the panda shepherd but the gene that Parti yorkies have, is the piebald gene which is a well known spotting gene - their color is not a result of a mutated gene. A parti will always throw 1 of it's 2 parti genes onto all of it's offspring, so your statement "If you breed a parti into your lines you may or may not have a baby who will carry the gene", is incorrect. I just wanted to clear that up for anyone who's trying to learn how the parti (piebald) gene works :-)

evab 02-26-2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3019527)
It is her site, she is saying she is merely informing us on that site , that its not a website its to inform.

What on earth is this all about. I have come on this site to make new friends, who share a common passion. And already I am accused of having a web site, that I have already said that is not my site....I can see here that some members choose to fire bullets at me.

I have not been on this site before tonight and already I feel most unwelcome, a shame really as there are some fabulously experienced yorkie lovers.:aimeeyork

evab 02-26-2010 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkiegirl2 (Post 3019512)
If we make a mistake with infomation we will correct it.
You could have contacted us about the error.
But instead you choose to berate and steal pictures that do not belong to you and used them without permission.
I hope you have corrected this and removed the pictures.
This board frowns on people who conducts themselves in this manner.

I also do not know what you are talking about, I surely have the right to defend myself against false accusations. I am not a member of your club, I have not stolen your pictures. Lowood has insulted me on another site many times and chooses to do so here, upon my very first introduction. I can not understand why you choose to make your remarks except that I now assume your are associated with the same club. Which is not a problem for me. If you are offended by my presence on this site you must ask the administrator to have me removed, which for me will be a very short lived forum member.:rolleyes:

Nancy1999 02-26-2010 05:04 PM

Please don't give up on us, when I first came here, people accused me of being someone else, and some thought I was a breeder, and some thought I was a troll; some still think I'm a troll! :D I suggest you introduce yourself in the General forum, http://www.yorkietalk.com/forums/gen...r-discussion/; most members are very friendly, the Parti/breeding threads get very controversial, and most members don't post on these threads for that reason.

Woogie Man 02-26-2010 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3019416)
I really do try to that, I'm a little disappointed that you haven't recognized that fact. A very small percentage of my posts involve parti threads.

Nancy, I do read your posts and I've seen your efforts directed at helping people find a good breeder. I don't really see how that relates to the post of mine you quoted to make your point, though. That part truly wasn't directed at any individual.

As for this particular thread, you did start off firing a broadside at parti breeders about the inbreeding (post #11) before clarifying. Those remarks are especially perplexing when taken with your remarks about Mr. Biewer and his vision (post #132), where you seemingly give kudos to a man that began the Biewer with only 2 dogs, something that could only have occurred with intensive inbreeding. There's a real disconnect in rationale there.

I'm also confused about your remarks about breeding for "the recessive gene" (post #29). I assume your talking about the piebald gene. The obvious potential health issue is deafness when the gene is extremely expressed, and that has been well researched in other breeds and has been discussed here before. If your talking about "the recessive gene" in general, you should know that a great many of the distinguishing traits of the Yorkshire Terrier come from recessive genes. I'm sure you meant only the piebald gene, but it is confusing, just the same.

Breezeaway 02-26-2010 05:35 PM

If you want to know who evab is all you have to do is go to the biewer pedigree database That is all I have to say.

livingdustmops 02-26-2010 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3019212)
Hi and welcome to Yorkietalk, from what I understand all the Parti's can be traced back to one line. Even the Biewer, developed in Germany, has been said to be linked to this line. I guess Mr. Biewer may have been a Parti breeder, but he seemed to take it very seriously, and wasn't just breeding pets, he had a vision and he developed a standard. After his death, the breed almost died out, but American interest brought it back to life. There are many breeders breeding the Biewer in America, and different clubs with different agendas, some believe that there is no difference between the Biewer and the Parti, and even mate the two together. Others believe that there are huge differences, and it's best to keep the lines pure. I believe that there are huge differences in the breeders and their motivations for breeding. So perhaps you know the parti as a Biewer?

If you believe in pedigree's and their value then it is a fact the Biewers and the Parti's came out of the Streamglen kennels in England. I have pointed you many times to a website for you to see these pedigrees. These pedigree's are what the Yorkshire Terrier World believes in before they started doing DNA and even today not all YTCA breeders do this.

Just because some of the dogs went to California and some to Germany it doesn't mean they are different dogs,,,,just like the Yorkies that were sold to different countries..

How the heck would you know what Mr. Biewer believed in ... he knowingly went to England and bought 4 dogs from Streamglen that were so inbreed it is not even funny..and then he inbreed them even more...look at the pedigree's they tell the story......not some website that has stretched the truth. Mr. Biewer only bred for less than 7 years and he had to have a standard if he wanted to register his dogs. The standard was a few sentences..Do you really believe these beautiful dogs just lost popularity in a few short years??? NO..they were dying...and it is why the Germans breed Yorkies back in and still believe they are Yorkies. Don't buy into the "Mrs. Biewer" garbage either...she has signed two different standards and frankly if she really cared about the dogs, why did she get rid of them after he died???? How many breeders on YT have their spouse involved in their breeding program????? They might love the dogs but few really know all the aspects of the breeding program. I also have not found any evidence that Mr. Biewer protected these dogs with the people he sold the dogs to.

DO NOT BELIEVE JUST BECAUSE A WEBSITE LOOKS GOOD THAT IT IS TELLING THE TRUTH. This same group that now says another breed was brought in (of course they won't tell you what that other breed is) only started saying this a few years ago...so either they started bringing in another breed or they are lying because they know a sucker is born every moment in this country.

Mardelin 02-26-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livingdustmops (Post 3019764)
How many breeders on YT have their spouse involved in their breeding program?????

Just wanted to answer this question for you. My husband is thoroughly involved in every aspect of my breeding program. Yep! Knows pedigrees as well as I do and whelps litters. Knows how to groom a show dog too.....and in a pinch will put up a topknot. And runs them to the vets.

livingdustmops 02-26-2010 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mardelin (Post 3019781)
Just wanted to answer this question for you. My husband is thoroughly involved in every aspect of my breeding program. Yep! Knows pedigrees as well as I do and whelps litters. Knows how to groom a show dog too.....and in a pinch will put up a topknot. And runs them to the vets.

The question is HOW MANY?...I have met to many breeders over the years and your husband would be the exception to the rule wouldn't you say?

livingdustmops 02-26-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breezeaway (Post 3019642)
If you want to know who evab is all you have to do is go to the biewer pedigree database That is all I have to say.

I have read the posts and clearly it is someone who has their own agenda.

Mardelin 02-26-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livingdustmops (Post 3019786)
The question is HOW MANY?...I have met to many breeders over the years and your husband would be the exception to the rule wouldn't you say?

Let me see my mentor's husband is thoroughly involved in her breeding program. So is Donna's/Brooklynn's mentor's husband. As a matter most of the member's of the Bluebonnet Yorkshire Terrier Club Spouses who are members of the club are pretty involved with their breeding programs. Although, they aren't members of YT, I know several breeder/exhibitors from other regional clubs as well as YTCA members whose husbands are members of those clubs and very involved with their breeding programs.

Breny 02-26-2010 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mardelin (Post 3019781)
Just wanted to answer this question for you. My husband is thoroughly involved in every aspect of my breeding program. Yep! Knows pedigrees as well as I do and whelps litters. Knows how to groom a show dog too.....and in a pinch will put up a topknot. And runs them to the vets.

I'm jealous. Mine poked his head in my whelping room for the first time (and only time???) and said "ewwww".

I'm on my own, which sucks, but I have breeder friends to fill that void.

Mardelin 02-26-2010 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Breny (Post 3019807)
I'm jealous. Mine poked his head in my whelping room for the first time (and only time???) and said "ewwww".

I'm on my own, which sucks, but I have breeder friends to fill that void.

Most of my breeder/exhibitor's friends are thorougly involved, in most cases it is a partnership. There's no way most of us could exhibit and breed if we didn't have our spouses support. Several have RVs so dogs are loaded up and hubby goes along to shows, and hubby assists with taking care of the dogs and helps at ringside.

livingdustmops 02-26-2010 07:51 PM

I do think many spouses support the spouse's interest but how many of them would continue with the breeding program if the spouse died? In the Biewer world I have seen 2 or 3 husbands in the showring and I have seen some come along to help with the dogs but seldom have I seen them determine which dogs are going to breed together and why.

Mardelin 02-26-2010 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livingdustmops (Post 3019844)
I do think many spouses support the spouse's interest but how many of them would continue with the breeding program if the spouse died? In the Biewer world I have seen 2 or 3 husbands in the showring and I have seen some come along to help with the dogs but seldom have I seen them determine which dogs are going to bred together and why.

Unfortunate. But, like I said most of my breeder/exhibitor's spouses are very involved, learning every aspect of the process. My husband and I sit down pour over pedigrees, study our females and males, discuss what we want to improve on. Would my husband continue on should something happen to me, probably not. He doesn't like the exhibiting part, so without that he doesn't feel breeding should continue. I'm in agreement, should I stop exhibiting, I stop breeding. It takes two and if a spouse isn't in full support it doesn't make for a happy homelife.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168