![]() |
Thank you all for your comments! I just wanted everyone to know a few things.... Judy is very adamant about her lineage being shown and has even offered to do the handling for me or help me in any other way possible to get my boy Championed. She has actually been so supportive of me showing! In her lines, the boy in particular that I am interested in, include Durrer, Parkside, Nealstar, Braecliff, Nic'n'ak, Everdears, Pastoral and others. She has an iron tight Contract when it comes to breeding rights and who may have them and when ie. they are championed. I think it is pretty bad to publicly slander someones dogs, even outright saying they look like they have a very serious disease. She loves these dogs, they live in her house, she talks about them like they are her babies. I completely see where people may see that she advertises smaller dogs as a warning sign. But in Alberta where we are people are selling "purebred Yorkies" that end up 20+ pounds, so I can see where she is trying to distinguish her dogs from others. She also goes above and beyond what most breeders I've talked to as far as testing her male and females. Her and I have talked way more about a Yorkies coat then the size of the dog. Just ask her about temperament and she will talk about each of her dogs with such love and pride. Her price is another thing and really it's not that much higher than other breeders I've talk with? Anyway I wanted to put my experience out there so people could judge for themselves. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you asked for opinions, and you received. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are many incredible breeders in Canada with gorgeous yorkies who meet standard with awesome lines. Just keep looking and be patient. It is worth the wait. :) |
Thank you Nicole.....everyone does have there own opinion on what a perfect yorkie is.... even the judges have there own opinion on a yorkie, one day you could be winning at the shows next day you have a different judge and come dead last........ I love what I breed and Iam very proud bottom line!! I wouldnt do anything different if I could except stoped a few people from getting my line before strickt contracts came in place in the past, but we all live and we learn we all breed to betterment the breed, some like longer legs, some like the shorter legs, its all what we like. Now Iam a reputable breeder and I dont use the term " Tea-cup" as other reputable show breeders raise there eye brows at this term.....I also correct people when trying to contact me for a Tea-cup as this is not a breed only a term that the public has used to descibe a smaller yorkie. but what really gets me is when some reputable breeders start bashing other breeders if they use the wrong word terms ( words to describe there yorkies )Tinies, baby dolls,ect well I use the term baby doll to describe my look of my yorkies as that is what they look to me and I want others to know what Iam meaning when I mean they have a gorgeous face. as a past world halter horse show handling/breeder I used these same terms to describe my gorgeous faced horses, baby doll heads.. words are words and people should not be judged on what wording they use to describe beauty. Quote:
|
Is that Mia in your aviator? She has the most beautiful "baby face" ever LOL |
:animal-paYES THAT IS MIA ( MULTI CH FC'S MIA IN CONTROL ) SHE HAS SUCH A GORGEOUS BABY DOLL LITTLE FACE, AND HAS THE MOST GORGEOUS SILKY COAT. WE LOVE MIA VERY MUCH SHE WON GROUP 4 TIMES AND ALMOST WAS ONE OF OF BEST IN SHOW WINNERS...A POODLE AND MY SELF AND MIA WERE CALLED OUT FOR BEST IN SHOW BUT MIA HAD SUCH A LONG DAY BY THAT TIME SHE WASNT IN THE MOOD ANY MORE...LOL SO THE POODLE TOOK BIS.LOL:animal-pa Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Breeding small to large does not equal medium,just a mix of both usually. |
I am not a breeder and will never be, but l want to add my opinion here. However, myself and many other people do have a serious interest in this breed, and of it's future. The baby doll face is cute but breeding to change the look of the Yorkshire Terrier even more, and making it smaller than it is all ready, is careless, selfish, and becoming an obsession. We all like the look of beautiful things and having something unique, but that doesn't mean that it is of better quality, or in the best interest of the breed. These baby doll face tiny dogs may have silky coats but they may be short lived and have other health issues not mentioned. There are many women who want this baby doll face look, for their future Yorkies. So there are now many breeders going for the green ($$$) in breeding them. I've seen some beautiful Yorkies with a slight baby doll face, but they have been standard size and not as extreme. Changing the shape of the skull IS NOT good and along with the tiny size, will bring about many more serious issues in the future. It amazing how humans constantly think they are in their right to perfect something that was already a good thing. This constant bothering on a high breed/show level is what was portrayed on the BBC-Pedigree Dogs Exposed documentary last week. If you want to perfect something in the Yorkshire Terrier breed, use common sense and perfect the HEALTH, not cutesiness. The Yorkie rightly owns that image already! |
Quote:
|
YT Rules Shoulldnt this entire thread be in the Breeders, Groomers review section of Yorkietalk? |
Quote:
I don't think the OP is an actual breeder yet. Nor was she reviewing the breeder mentioned. She was asking in the mainstream has anyone ever heard of the breeder and seen the website, and she wanted their opinions. At least that is what I'm reading. |
I've been following this post and think it's a very interesting topic. I personally have biewers and am new to breeding. As a labor and delivery nurse and one who loves genetics, I wanted to pass this link on about a documentary that is coming out to the states soon. Most of us do want what is best for the breed, but I believe the differences lie in our opinions of what is best. I personally have no opinion about a particular breeder. I do, however, believe we should be very careful that our personal quests for beauty do not out weigh the overall health of any breed. The documentary is a little long, but well worth it. As I watched what some breeders have done to promote genetic hysteria and heartache within their own breeds, it made me pause and take a look at what is most important to me as a new breeder. I came away with many more questions needing answered before beginning my program and I think questions are a great place to start. I look at my beautiful little girls cuddled in my lap and want them to produce healthy, strong, babies for generations to enjoy. I don't want a beautiful, fraile (sp?), unhealthy dog that wins in the ring, but at the end of the day has a miserable life and promotes the beginning of the end for this breed. All that said, I'm coming to find out there are many interpretations for the phrase "for the love of the breed". Great mentors, genetic testing, and trying to breed to correct potential health issues are paramount for all of us who love these precious little dogs. Again, this isn't a dig at any one breeder, just something I think we should all take a good, long, look at whether be are beginning or have been breeders for 20+ yrs. Thank you all for your comments, it helps me put some things in perspective. Potentially Explosive BBC Doc on Purebreds Set to Air Stateside - Paw Nation For the love of the breed... Heather, Lizzy, & Sydni |
Quote:
I don't think that the majority of breeders are breeding with intention of the wins in the ring. Most breeder/exhibitors, exhibit to gain approval of our breeding stock......healthy, beautiful representation of the breed. I just can't phathom why anyone would do otherwise......how sad if that is what breeders are doing....... |
Quote:
I think that the main concern when looking at this breeders webpage, which is a representation of what she is striving for is that she is breeding what she likes, with screen of being a show breeder. A good breeder is showing for the purpose of getting aproval of their lines, and is breeding with the standard in mind and for the purpose of bettering the breed (this has been mentioned already I know). Idealy, both the showing and breeding work together creating a wonderful hobby for a person who truly loves and appreciates the breed. This is why a good place to look for a dog of a certain breed should be in someone who is exhibiting the breed and who has shown a good measure of dedication and ethics. There is no question that this breeders dogs are very pretty. But, I do not get how breeding a 2.5lb male, from any background could posible be bettering the breed. This male produces small puppies as the breeder herself has stated, this is why it is "safe" to breed him to her 4lb female. But I have never seen a 2lb CH dog and this is because no judge in their right mind would approve a 2lb dog for breeding (male or female). I have a very small girl and I think that it is irresponsible to try to get dogs this tiny on purpose. They are alot of work and take many special considerations even when completely healthy. This breeder in my opinion is not breeding for her self, for her next show dog(because 2-3lb dogs don't do well in the ring). She is breeding to fill a pet market, for the tiny enthusiast, for the people looking for a living "baby doll" The reason I would suggest the OP look elsewhere is because if it were me I would want to get my stock from the best breeder possible, why buy from a breeder with "greats" in their lines? if you could potentially put in the work and buy from the "greats" themselves. I hope what ever road is taken that she ends up with a fabulous dog. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Judy dostal is a horrible, horrible breeder!!!! She breeders sick dogs, i got my baby cherry from her, she was soooo very sick when she came, she was hospitalized for 2 days, then she ot better but she only lived for 7 months, thanx to judy dostal our whole family was so depressed for the longest time!...ohh and also, after she gets the money from you, she stops emailing you back, or writing really short nasty emails...it's so obvious she is in this for the money!!!!!!!!!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Am I mistaken, or wasn't the Yorkshire Terrier originally a much larger dog ?? I also read that most Yorkies had a wooly/cottony coat. Haven't people bred to change the Yorkie for years - I believe this has happened already. To say that people shouldn't change the Yorkie seems a bit funny to me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's why I personally stick to private breeders who breed towards the standard, not trying to make little dogs because they are in demand and can get more money from them. It's so much better to have the au natural version rather then a cosmetic one. |
Quote:
|
I found her site a couple weeks ago and emailed about a little girl for a pet. Her price for pet was $4,000 + shipping US Dollars! I am sorry that is just way too much! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use