| FlDebra | 10-27-2010 08:33 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by DvlshAngel985
(Post 3312279)
I don't think you were mean, but the op to me seemed really harsh and not objective at all. You were trying to understand, and that is how I took your particular post. | Thank you for understanding too! Quote:
Originally Posted by diannenet
(Post 3312289)
I didn't think your comments were harsh. I apologize if you took it that way. I was referring to the manner in which some of the comments were written. I guess I should have been more specific. | Thank you Dianne! Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyjane
(Post 3312299)
...I do think that it kind of went on and on and I did feel it was a bit rough. Just my take...and everyone reads things in a different fashion. I personally, after reading what the OP put in the subject line, would have walked away rather than join in the complaints. And....if I had questions about the water content, I think I would have taken it to PM....the thread was titled in a way that, after that, anything would sound harsh. That is just my personal opinion. | I guess I read more of what the actual complaints were instead of worrying over the thumbs down title. I actually did not have questions about the water content. That all started as an explanation to someone else that it was watery as part of the way it was made, not made and then watered down. Then the subject of water got carried on ad infintum as we BOTH tried to explain ourselves. Why would I have PM'd that -- it was not a complaint? I did not see the "rough" comments or any attack. Still do not. This is the YT Seller Feedback and Seller Review Forum. I think people should feel free to comment truthfully. No one made any insulting or disparaging comments. Everything was specific to what they did or did not like about the product. I think every negative comment was made in an objective way, saying only what they did not care for and refraining from any disrespectful comments. Each person listed specifically why they were not pleased with the product. Nothing vague, no negative adjectives --only very specific reasons that could be considered by the vendor. (i.e. Does not lather well, does not leave hair soft or shiny, too watery, need to use too much.....these are very objective.) I think WalnutHill can take these comments as valid complaints that may or may not be considered in future products or variations. She may have so many orders that she really doesn't worry about it or she may some day have a different formula for people who find it too watery -- evidently she has considered and developed it already, so that complaint evidently is not a surprise to her. I think it was all done respectfully. I know I have the utmost respect for Walnut Hill and her endeavor!
We might as well close this folder, if negative comments can never be made about a YT vendors products without fear of controversy. I certainly lavish the praise on when I am happy with products. I think this is the first YT vendor product I have commented negatively about ever. I wonder how many are holding back their comments now, so as not to get a finger pointed at them. I think sometimes the YT vendors are also our friends, and some want to jump in and defend them instead of letting a valid review stand. I can understand that in a way, but it isn't doing any good for a balanced review system. Can't say this folder will hold much credibility for me anymore. |