![]() |
Rosemark responds Folks, Just to set the record straight, I sold a show prospect with a full registration to a person who showed him to his championship which requires a full registration. I do not sell pets with full registrations. Unfortunately, I trusted this person do the right thing and have learned that I will no longer sell show dogs without remaining as a co-owner so that I can retain control over where my dogs end up. I disliked the fact that other name breeders retained this type of control, but now I understand that it's necessary to retain control of where my dogs end up. A quality breeder's biggest fear is that our dogs will end up poorly cared for or in a puppy mill. I'm happy that you love your new boy, and I do hope that you breed him wisely and for the betterment of the breed. Marshall is capable of producing wonderful puppies when bred to a quality bitch and if you understand what qualities he brings the table. |
It really angers me when things like this happen. It makes it extremely difficult for newer breeders who would never betray trust to obtain quality dogs from quality breeders. |
Quote:
No matter what a contract says, there are some underlying principles and ethics involved with breeding, showing, and ownership of all dogs. Here in Canada it is pretty common to sell on co-ownership if the dog is on full/open registration. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm sorry Roseanne you've been betrayed by someone you trusted. Thank you though for coming on and explaining this situation. I just knew in my heart, that you did not approve of Marshall's rehoming this way. But also, knew others here that didn't know of your integrity and might not be aware of your good reputation. I still can not wrap my mind around the fact that the new owner had the gall to come on here and brag about her back door acquisition of your boy.:eek: |
Rosanne I totally know how you feel. I thought many times I could trust a person and everytime end up being used. There is a woman who has done just that to me and will be praying on many of you. Anyone who wants the her name may PM me and I will be more than happy to help you. It is a BAD sitution and I know for a fact she is praying on the next stupid person. She comees off nice a wonderful BUT I cane give you a nightmare story. We all need to protect our names and our wonderful dogs. God welling you boy will be used with care and will be loved! Sparklingbluyorkies.com |
Quote:
It was rather disingenuous to introduce to us her "new" CH and say she was looking one day for puppies in the ring. If you go to her website she already has a pup listed as being from the Marshall breeding. That means over two months ago she got that dog, or at least had one of her bitches bred by him. And apparently she is a Parti breeder too. Perhaps she thought no one would notice. eh? with the Internet it definitely is a small small world we live in. |
Quote:
I saw her puppy page yesterday too and was appalled at what I read:mad: |
Unfortunately, she's not the only one to blame. :rolleyes: (Crestwing) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So, Diane Henry sold Marshall to Stephanie Miller without a contract? |
Quote:
But, there is so much more. |
Quote:
You resell a dog without a contract? Why? This has opened my eyes even more. I will never ever sell a breeding dog without co-ownership. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use