09-25-2007, 01:41 PM
			
			  |  
			 
			#1  |  
  |    Tiny Dog Big Heart Donating Member   
				  Join Date: Feb 2006  Location: Texas  
					Posts: 6,205
				        |       Pet Owner Tests 24 Chinese-Made Dog Toys For Lead        I found this interesting.      Quote:    
			
				Pet Owner Tests 24 Chinese-Made Dog Toys For Lead   
Posted: 24 Sep 2007 03:00 PM CDT   
Nancy, an Illinois pet owner, wanted to know how safe the chew toys 
her Shelties played with were.   
She hired an Illinois Department of Agriculture laboratory to test 24 
Chinese-made dog toys for lead.   
Nancy became concerned for her pets' health after the pet food 
recalls. She also noticed that all of her dogs' toys were all made in China. 
When she went to Petco and PetSmart, she could only find one toy in both 
stores that was not made in China.   
"I was doing this personally for the safety of my dogs and only tested 
for lead because that's what they're finding in the toys from China," she 
said.   
According to the Illinois Department of Agriculture lab, all 24 toys 
had lead levels that were within Illinois's acceptable limits for lead paint 
in children's toys. The lab also stated that the lead levels were below the 
600 parts per million level that is accepted by federal law for lead paint 
in children's toys.   
The highest levels of lead, 335.7 parts per million, were found in a 
PetSmart tennis ball. A Hertz Rubber Percival Platypus had the lowest levels 
of lead - 0.02 parts per million.   
Dr. Gene Niles, who is the lab director and a Diplomate of the 
American Board of Veterinary Toxicology, said: "These are all within the 
acceptable limits for lead content in children's toys in Illinois. There are 
no levels for lead content in pet toys. Are these numbers high or low? All I 
can tell you is that in Illinois, the state allows up to 600 parts per 
million for lead in kid's toys and these are all within that guideline."   
But the lead levels found in the PetSmart tennis ball are 335 times 
higher than the amount Expertox, a Texas, lab found in one of the Wal-Mart 
pet toys they tested.     
A latex dog toy that looks like a green monster was found to have lead 
levels of 907.4 micrograms per kilograms.   
"That's almost one part per million," said ExperTox's director and 
forensic toxicologist Dr. Ernest Lykissa, Ph.D. "With that kind of 
concentration, if a dog is chewing on it or licking it, he's getting a good 
source of lead."   
Expertox's lab manager said that the levels found in the PetSmart 
tennis ball are not safe. She said that those levels were higher than in the 
green monster toy, and that the 335.7 parts per million of lead found in the 
tennis ball is not a safe level for pets.   
But Dr. Niles, at the Illinois Department of Agriculture's lab, 
disagreed with Expertox. He said that one part per million of lead should 
not pose a health risk to pets.   
"That's my personal opinion, not the opinion of the Illinois 
Department of Agriculture," he said. "You'd find very few things that you 
would let anybody play with if that (one part per million) was your 
benchmark."   
in response to the Illinois lab findings, PetSmart said their products 
are safe and they routinely test their products for lead and other toxins. A 
company spokesman said PetSmart products meet safety and quality standards 
and protocols that are based on federal, state, institution, and the company's 
own standards.   
The company spokesman also said Expertox using one part per million as 
a safety measure for toxins levels in pet toys is not fair.   
"The terms 'high' and 'elevated' are relative terms and must be used 
carefully and given proper context to avoid confusion and alarm," he said. 
"It's not fair to pit a (forensic) toxicologist against a veterinary 
toxicologist on this issue. I don't think he (Dr. Lykissa) has a leg to 
stand on. He's not a veterinary toxicologist and has no point of reference 
when he talks about elevated levels. Elevated against what? I don't think 
his results bring any value to this discussion. And his comments will not 
change anything we're doing. To our knowledge, we are not selling any 
products that have compounds that have tested above levels of toxicity 
established by the various entities named above and are not posing any 
health threat to pets or humans."   
Despite the difference in opinions on what is considered safe and what 
is not, the pet industry has agreed that there needs to be regulations on 
pet toys and national acceptable standards for lead and other toxins in pet 
toys need to be established.   
Until that happens, the president of the American Pet Products 
Manufacturers Association said members of the organization will be 
triple-checking and testing their products.   
Meanwhile, Nancy said she is glad that the lab found that her dogs' 
toys were deemed to be safe. However, she is a bit troubled that she can't 
find any pet toys made in the United States.   
Source: ConsumerAffairs
			
		 |            
				__________________  Little Bit     |  
    
		
		
		
		
		 
	 |        |