| Britster | 07-27-2013 08:19 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by JuneBugs Momma
(Post 4281538)
She was just sharing a story. She obviously did very well with her 22 year old Chi, so she's not "doing better" by her Yorkie. She is just accomodating to a different lifestyle and what she feels more comfortable with, which is fine. :) I will continue to "not do best" by Jackson then since I hardly use any prevention (as far as flea/tick meds go) and refuse to give my dog any more vaccinations besides what is legally required of me. I truly believe he is better off for it. Do I think not giving him anymore shots is going to allow him to live to be 25 or outlive dogs given yearly shots? No. But I think as pet parents, we're obligated to research and learn, and inform ourselves how to let our pets live the best life they can, as we are their voice. Thank you Britster First of all, most vaccines that are given to dogs as their "first" or "puppy" vaccines are usually good for anywhere between 4-7 years, if not the whole life of the canine. Many people titer test to see if their canine still has immunity. Anything on the test 2 or below shows immunity but re-vaccination is suggested. Higher the number, the better. I am definitly not saying DO NOT VACCINATE. Like I stated earlier, I am doing what I think is best for me and my dogs' current lifestyle. My chi was NEVER in contact with other dogs and therefore, no reason to continue to vaccinate against diseases that are contracted through vectors or dog -to- dog. The AVMA has changed their recommendations for core vaccinations to every 3-4 years or at that time, titer test to see what their immunity level is. It is VERY dangerous to over-vaccinate any dog but he smaller breeds suffer the most. They also recommend that any dog over the age of 10 not be re-vaccinated at all!!! (With the exception of rabies by law). The Lyme vaccine is a bunch of crapola! Wether it is live or dead vaccine, dogs that have received the vaccine with yearly boosters have tested positive for the diesease thru a 4DX test when in reality, they did NOT have it. This leads to vets prescribing Doxycycline to treat the illness which then they later find out was a false positive. If small breed dogs are found to be positive for lymes and DO NOT show any of the symptoms, they SHOULD NOT be treated for it. Vets are prescribing Doxy to small breed dogs with a false positive and the dogs are getting ill from the drug, not the fact that they have the disease. The best protection you can give your dog in regards to vector borne diseases is to be proactive. I go over my dog with a fine tooth comb wether we are out for 5 minutes just to go potty or if we are out 5 hours at a friends house. I do not like using topicals on my dog for fleas & ticks, but, I put into consideration where I live and what the chances are of JuneBug contracting such diseases. I also never put the whole amount of the topical on him. The topical I use is for dogs up to 20lbs. JB is only 7lbs. so I do what I feel is right. If I lived in an area where I did not have to worry about such things, I would accomodate to what sees fit. Yes, I have done my research and if anyone would like me to send them some of the links, I'd be more than happy to accomodate :D | My dog is in contact with other dogs, I take him to pet stores, he goes to dog parks sometimes, we go out a lot in public, he is outdoors all the time, in woods, etc, and I still feel perfectly safe with the vaccines he's been given and am not worried one bit.
The Lyme vaccine is kind of a joke IMO. Lyme tests are so inadequate in being able to help determine a definitive diagnosis anyway, so many false-positives and only 5% of dogs show symptoms. My Jackson was one of the 5%, he came up lame one day on his back leg, thought it was odd, did x-rays, etc, it ended up being a positive lymes test. With a few days worth of pain meds and doxycycline, he was 100% better the next day. For the past 3 years, his lyme test has come back negative and he's never had any other symptoms. Whether he's actually negative or not, who knows, but I still wouldn't touch the lyme vaccine with a ten-foot pole.
Lyme vaccines were removed from the human market because they failed to perform the proper safety studies prior to release and because of the numerous adverse events that followed the vaccine, some resulting even in death. There are other tick borne illnesses that are much more serious than Lyme, and we have no vaccines for them. So even if a very safe and effective Lyme vaccine came out, having your dog vaccinated for Lyme isn't going to lessen the need for tick prevention. And for humans, it's a worse disease than for dogs. Rarely is it as serious for a dog to have lymes as a human.
Reasons not to give it: Quote:
One, 19 of 27 veterinary colleges in North America do not give Lyme vaccination, and the other 8 only give it if the owner requests it.
Two, it can often cause inflammatory arthritis in dogs who get it, just like Borrelia itself can. However, unlike natural Borrelia infection, antibiotics have no effect on the vaccine-induced form of the disease.
Three, the human version of this vaccine was removed from the market.
Four, like all bacterial vaccines, immunity doesn't last long and thus the vaccine needs frequent repetition to be effective, which means you are exposing your dog to the risk again and again, unlike viral vaccines which provide years, probably a lifetime, of immunity.
| Revaccination
Lepto is another one. Lepto is really very rare, in the big spectrum of things. Less than 200 cases in the U.S. and half those in Hawaii. It's really common in tropical countries with heavy rainfall. The vaccine doesn't even protect against all the different strains of the lepto. Vets see more cases of reactions to lepto vaccine, than lepto itself.
Either way, I can't give lepto vaccine even if I wanted to (horrid reaction to it). |