| Ellie May | 08-14-2011 04:18 AM | Larger companies may have more money to get the word out, but I'm not sure they would do that. If it's anything really major, it would be on the news anyway (and recalls.gov).
They do have more money to put into safety. Whether or not they spend it in the right places is up to pet owners to decide after talking to the company.
Simple as this for me. If I'm not convinced a company is doing any type of feeding trials (palatability alone doesn't count), hiring the right people to formulate recipes, do an adequate amount of QC testing, and has a willingness to answer questions, then their foods move down on my list.
If they do not let veterinary nutritionists tour and I find out about it, then they also move waaaay down on my list. And if they aren't furthering the study of canine nutrition, then why not? Do they ahve no interest in it? I like when they do some real research. Otherwise, the field stands still. As much as a lot of people on YT tend to hate the larger companies (and even the rx foods - and yes, it's obvious that many people hate them - I used to be one of them), their foods save lives. Whether or not people want to admit it, they sometimes save an animal from a lot of pain and suffering. They do not always work. Nothing always works. However, they are certainly better than nothing. This tells me that these companies are doing something right.
I sent an email to tons of companies a couple weeks ago and to this day a handful have not responded. Will be emailing them again to give the benefit of the doubt. However, this really concerns me. If they can't answer my questions, I'm not feeding their food. My puppies aren't guinea pigs, so we will try trusted products first. :) If we were talking about a small treat they got once a month or something, I wouldn't be nearly as concerned (but even then some companies are automatically out). But my dogs get the same food at least twice daily for months to years, so it is a big thing. |