![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The line hasn't been drawn and probably never will be drawn. That is the sad part. You can now find people breeding two lb females. Where do you draw the line? Saying they are all toy size and you don't think it's safe to breed any of them just doesn't cut it for me. If you stand by that, why risk any female yorkie for your gain? Why not choose a larger breed? I hope that doesn't sound rude because that is not how I mean it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The breed standard according to the YTCA and the AKC if "not more than 7 lbs". Are we now making up a new standard because I, for one, am all for it? I think while we are at it we should ban docking of tails, put in a few paragraphs about temperament and take the emphasis off the outward appearance and back on the terrier attitude. This thread is not about the "standard". This is about whether ot not it is "cruel" or "bad for the female" or overly risky or dangerous. The members arguing that it is common sense not to breed tinies are not saying it is because they don't agree with dogs under 4 lbs being in existence but rather that there are health reasons not to breed them. So, unfortunately your argument does not address the issue as presented and debated in the last 8 pages but it sounded good on the surface. |
Actually.... I've always heard that yorkie standard is 4-7 pounds. When I started looking for a yorkie.... I remember also seeing it in books - I think many of us use that as a guideline for when we choose our yorkies - people USED to be happy with 4-6 lbs....a yorkie under 4 lbs is just plain SMALL. I think most of us stayed on track with our feelings about breeding tinies.... |
Quote:
It is more than common sense, it's tack, moral's, care and love for the bitch. So, when someone else brings up standard it is wrong, but ok when it fit's someone else's views...I understand now...Sorry, I am done!! :( |
Quote:
This does make sense to me. Thank you....leave it to you to have the most logical explanation. I can accept this, but I still will not find it okay or acceptable to badger breeders who choose to breed smaller or to say they are "just in it for the money" or they don't give a hoot about their dogs because L know otherwise. I have not hidden the fact that I feel breeding should only be undertaken by the most experienced and educated people who have the very best vets and reproductive specialists at their disposal and that all tests are performed and that all risks are minimized. Minimizing the risks would proably include not breeding a tiny, fragile dog or a larger fragile dog. So, no I am not totally opposed to breeding but, imo, the people who breed should be the best of the best and should have a mentor who is the best of the best, etc. I think this has been a good debate and we all learned something. |
Quote:
|
I don't know that I learned anything personally - I haven't changed my feelings one bit...I AM surprised that 3 people voted PRO breeding tinies. Too bad...That's 2 more than I expected to see in this poll. |
Nope, only 2! One of the members said they read the question backwards and really was opposed... :) |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use