| JeanieK | 06-28-2010 06:57 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mardelin
(Post 3180054)
But, Jeanie what right people would be suspended. Isn't that dependent on which side of an arguement a person is on that would contribute to their judgement on who are the right people to be suspended.
As far as your description of people ganging up on one person. I really don't buy it. The internet is such a wonderful tool to hide behind, you have time to collect your thoughts and control your anger. You have the option of walking away from the situation for a while. In other words you lose cool you lost war.
First of all Mod and Admin look at every angle of a situation. What seems so obvious to us, really isn't the whole picture... we think both should be suspended or more than two, depending on the situation. These two people disect everything and look at it logically from every angle. It's just not that easy of a job. But, it is easy to be a Monday Morning Quarterback
| I've seen it happen so fast that no one had time to disect anything. it all depends on who end out the redflag.
I have seen the set ups. The build up, starts with just two people, then one side recruits another, and another, and the poor lone wolf is cornered, then they start to egg them on, waiting for them to lose control. One wrong word and poof they are suspended in a matter of seconds.
No Monday morning quarter back, been on the playing field, saw the whole thing, more than once. left me sitting there saying What the heck just happened.
Next thing you know all of the posts are gone. From what I had observed, all parties involved should have been suspended, but as it was pointed out, some people know just where to draw the line. And when the comments are spread out among several it doesn't make any one person look too bad. | 