Quote:
Originally Posted by MyFairLacy I never said that CKC registered dogs were crappy - i said the registry was crappy - as in no conformation shows & will registered anything for money, even mixed breeds. There are so many registries out there and the papers aren't really worth anything - it just makes people feel special for having a "registered" dog. But I never said CKC dogs were crappy - I'm sure there are some beautiful yorkies of very good quality that are CKC registered, just asa there are some terrible quality AKC yorkies out there. That's why it's more important to look at the individual breeder and dogs...I wouldn't buy a puppy just because it is AKC registered because that in it's self doesn't mean anything. I'd look at the breeder and the pedigree of their dogs and quality of the dogs. |
You are right...you didn't say that. My apologies--I did not intend for my post to make it sound like I was putting those words in your mouth.
I have seen it presented that way, and was just making a general statement. Reading back now over what I said, it did come accross at being directed at you...
not my intention. Sorry.
Thanks tammy--I just think that sometimes more emphasis is put on the registry than the dog, when I think it should be the other way around.