![]() |
| |
|
Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us. |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #16 |
| Donating Senior Yorkie Talker | Well this just shows that everyone thinks of pets in a different way....Before I get any pet I do ALOT of research to know what I'm getting myself into. As for the breeder, How on earth could she do that to those babies let alone the mother. I know when We brought Izzy home at 12.5 weeks i was freaking out because she was so little and I was not sure in she was eating enough etc... That poor puppy!!!
__________________ My Sweet Little Izzy ![]() Yup, She's stolen my heart!! |
| | |
| Welcome Guest! | |
| | #17 |
| No Longer a Member | I can understand your anger, and I definatly agree that the breeder should pay for releasing such a young puppy. However, if you don't know the whole situation don't start throwing stones, I guess I'm just funny but I hate when anyone calls anyone stupid. I would call the new owners of the 4 week old ignorant for not doing their research before buying a puppy, and I can only hope that they turned in the breeders information to the vet so proper action can be taken. I hope they learned from this and will spread the word to others that didn't know any better. Both parties in this case are at fault, but at least the puppy went to a family responsible enough to take it to the vet at the first sign of trouble, rather than to someone who would wait until it got to an irrepariable state then take it in, see the vet bill and just dump it for someone else to take care of... |
| | |
| | #18 |
| BANNED! Join Date: May 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 1,218
| The buyer is no way responsible for the age of the pup being sold. This ALL of the breeders doing. There is absolutely no excuse for selling them a pup at 4 weeks! And especially new dogs owners..ugh.. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| BANNED! Join Date: May 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 1,218
| Quote:
So those of us with computers have learned to research these things online are at much more of an advantage. And it is much more difficult to go to the library and check out books on all the dog info we have at our fingertips here. I get many people who have never owned a dog before and do not own a computer and just don't know many of the things we do. It isn't their fault. Most of my clients find me by word of mouth and call me, or have a friend or daughter email for them to get info. It is MY job as a breeder to give them proper education, even if they never buy one of my pups. I get emails & calls all the time from people who just want info about the breed among other questions, I always help. Thats my job, my responsibility as a breeder and fellow human being. | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| No Longer a Member | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Posts: 1,290
| Poor little puppy and family. I cannot imagine anyone could be so cruel and ignorant! |
| | |
| | #22 |
| YorkieTalk Newbie! Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: South Africa
Posts: 2
| That is just terrible!!!! I can't believe some breeders!! And I think I've known since I was a young child, that the earliest age you can take a puppy home is at 6 weeks, depending on the breed!! I hope the puppy grows up to be a healthy dog seeing that it was taken away from the mommy so early in life! |
| | |
| | #23 |
| No Longer a Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: With My Beautiful Fur Babies!
Posts: 5,525
| This is AWFUL!! I cannot imagine letting a baby go to a new home at such a young age! Livi's babies were still nursing and trying to learn how to eat soft food (and not really doing so great with canned food at 4 weeks....it took them more time to get the hang of it). Her babies were still a touch "wobbly" on their feet at this age. I would not normally blame the buyer at all, buttttttt anyone that has seen a small breed at this young of an age, knows how itty bitty they are. I guess I just don't see how research matters in this case....it really boils down to common sense. However, I will say, I feel bad for the new family and HORRIBLE for this precious puppy....and I definitely think this breeder is BEYOND bad!!!!! |
| | |
| | #24 |
| I Love My Yorkies Donating Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 37,147
| The breeder is horrible but isnt all to blaime. The buyer should have known the pup was too young it doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that out
__________________ Chachi's & Jewels Mom Jewels http://www.dogster.com/?132431 Chachi http://www.dogster.com/?132427 |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Senior Yorkie Talker Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 82
| [QUOTE=Ladymom;3140400]In Missouri it is illegal to sell a puppy under weeks old. Missouri Animal Care Facility Rules Governing Licensing, Fees, Reports, Record Keeping, Veterinary Care, Identification and Holding Period These regulations regarding care of the puppy and the age it is sold at only applies to LICENSED breeders. This is from the above website, telling who has to be licensed in Missouri. A breeder with 3 or under females does not have to be licensed and follow the regulations on care and age. A licensed breeder could not legally have sold a puppy this young D) The following persons are exempt from the licensing fees and inspection requirements: 1. Persons engaged in breeding dogs and cats who harbor three (3) or less intact females; and 2. Registered hobby and show breeders. It was wrong for the new family and for the puppy for the breeder to have let a new puppy go to its home at this age, regardless of whether it was regulated by the license. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Donating YT Addict Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Lake Charles, La, United States
Posts: 325
| In my case, after meeting Precious the breeder told me that if they (there were two boy/girl) didn't sell she was going to sit in a Walmart Parking lot to sell them. I did what I had to and I bought baby girl. Can you imagine what would've happened had I not? I called her later that evening to see if the brother was left bcs I didn't have enough cash to cover both when we met. I was going to go back and get him as well. almost 5 weeks old was too soon to have a puppy outside. I don't know about their situation but each one is unique and in my case I think Precious is definitely better off. Even if that means I do live under a rock
__________________ Mom to 3 skin-kids and one furbaby SAHM and full time photographer |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| YT 2000 Club Member | Quote:
I do believe in some cases a pup that young and under those circumstances was definitly better off with you. .. I have gotten almost all of my pups when they were 6 weeks old (not saying its right) but one and that was my toy poodle I got her at 10 wks. Tucker came to me at almost 7 weeks. The breeder of him were friends of ours and he was way better off with me where I was watching him around the clock then he was with them.(long story) I would take in a pup that young in a heartbeat if I knew that it would be in the best interest of the pup. Only because I know what it involves to take care of a pup that young, But I know not everyone can. I feel sorry for the puppy, I hope the owners relize how important it is to care for a pup that young. That breeder should be ashamed of themselves..
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Donating Yorkie Yakker Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Las Vegas.
Posts: 955
| Las vegas passed a law that all pets over 4months must be fixed I first thought this was ridiculous but after looking at pounds and irrisponsible breeders Im very proud they made this las 50,000 dogs a year put down in clark county alone. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart