|
Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us. |
|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
08-26-2005, 08:18 AM | #1 |
BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Pet Shop Sues for Defamation This is a cross post from another site but I thought is was important enough to let our members know about because it could happen here just as easily. I would never want to discourage the fight against puppymills and pet stores that bu y from puppymills but just make sure you know the facts before you post anything so you cannot be accused of defamation. If it is TRUE, it is not defamation. Also, if you say "in my opinion" it is not defamation. Singapore: Pet shop sues dead dog's owner over Net posting -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Arul John tnp@sph.com.sg COURT recently handled an unusual case - two people embroiled in a fight over a dead puppy. The fight erupted after the 3-month-old puppy, a Jack Russell terrier, died soon after it was bought from a pet shop. The disappointed pet owner posted an Internet message to say the shop knowingly sold him a sick puppy. The angry shop owner, a woman, sued the buyer for defamation. The case, believed to be the first of its kind here, was settled amicably after the buyer agreed to apologise. The tussle is believed to have cost the parties about $20,000 in total, for damages and legal fees. It all started from a message the puppy's owner, shipping clerk Wilson Tan, 30, posted on an Internet discussion forum a week before the puppy, which he named Jasper, died on Feb 29 last year. He accused Mr William Lim, who runs The Puppy Shop near Chua Chu Kang, of selling him a dog which was sick. He also accused Mr Lim of pretending to be an animal specialist and being dishonest. He urged people not to patronise the shop. Mr Lim's daughter, Ms Sharon Lim, 31, who owns the shop, saw the Internet message. She and her father sued Mr Tan. According to court documents, Mr Tan bought the puppy for $1,008 from Mr Lim on Jan 25 last year. As he did not have the money himself, he and five other friends chipped in to pay for the dog. VACCINATED At the time of the purchase, Mr Lim said the dog was properly vaccinated and he even made sure it was healthy before selling it. But Mr Tan claimed the puppy became very sick soon after he took it home. He said that in early February, the puppy was treated for blood in its stools. Barely two weeks later, it also started coughing and having diarrhoea. He took the dog to Mount Pleasant Animal Clinic (North), where a vet told him the puppy was abnormal and needed more tests. Three days later, he said the puppy collapsed and was taken to Mount Pleasant Animal Hospital (MPAH). On Feb 24, Mr Tan posted the defamatory Internet message. A medical report on Feb 25 by hospital veterinarians Anthony Goh and Boon Chia Yun said the puppy had 'a circling gait and incoordination'. It also had neurological problems that might have been caused by an infection or a birth defect. Another veterinarian who examined the dog, Dr Carolyn Carlson of the Animal Recovery Centre, said its left side was weak and its skull was swollen because of possible fluid buildup in the brain. She added that such conditions were often inborn, but neither she nor the other veterinarians Mr Tan visited could pinpoint the cause of the puppy's condition. In the end, all the treatments failed - Jasper was put to sleep on Feb 29 and cremated the same day. On Mar 1, Ms Lim went into the Internet discussion forum and saw Mr Tan's message. She filed a police report the next day and later went to court. A two-day trial was to have started on Wednesday, but after both parties met the the judge in chambers, they decided to settle the dispute out of court. Lawyer David Rasif, who represented Mr Lim and the pet shop, said Mr Tan agreed to pay an undisclosed sum in damages. The New Paper understands the damages amounted to a few thousand dollars. Mr Rasif added that Mr Tan agreed to post an apology in the same Internet forum where his defamatory remarks appeared. In the message, he indicated that he 'unreservedly apologised' to Mr Lim and The Puppy Shop for his 'unjustified and unfair' comments on the Farmart Centre website. When contacted, Ms Lim said: 'We are satisfied with the judgment. We run an honest business and our puppies' health and the homes they go to are our first priority. 'Veterinarians check our puppies every week. That is why we were upset and humiliated at the unjustified and unfair comments in the message.' Mr Tan's lawyer, Ms Jeanny Ng, said they persuaded the Lims to settle for less than they had earlier asked for. After the case, Mr Tan said he wished he had not been so impulsive. He said he had wanted to write about his experience but admitted that it was wrong of him to make the defamatory remarks. He said he now has another puppy, a Bichon Frise, named Richie, and wanted to put the case behind him. He said: 'I got the dog from friends and Richie is sensitive to my moods. He comes to me when he sees I am down and hangs around until I feel better.' http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/top/st..... |
Welcome Guest! | |
08-26-2005, 08:32 AM | #2 |
Owned by Fred Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,352
| Thanks for sharing, Kim. This should be very eye-opening for those that also have bad issues with breeders, etc. Just be careful with what you post about a business or a person. People just love sueing these days. |
08-27-2005, 11:58 AM | #3 |
BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Someone else started a new thrwd about this in th OT section and i just wanted to bump it up so they could see that I include the fact that it did not happen in our counrty but rather in Singapore but it would hav ehad the smae result here because it was found tht the Buyer LIED about the facts and defamed the pet store. I merely want to help our members stop pet stores who buy their puppies from puppymills and do it wothout subjecting themselves unnecessarily to liability. If what you say and publish is TRUE and you state that it is your opinion there is no way the Pet Stire could prevail in a lawsuit. |
08-27-2005, 12:05 PM | #4 | |
YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: LA
Posts: 1,568
| Quote:
__________________ Lisa Proud Marine Mom Carter, Cooper & Crissy's Mom and Sebastian's Nana Never underestimate the warmth of a cold nose! | |
08-27-2005, 12:14 PM | #5 |
YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: seaside,ca
Posts: 1,763
| kim, i really hope that you are not directing that at me. what happened between me and royalpuppies is something that many has said not just me! what i said is my opinion, just like what everyone said is their opinion also. i don't feel that we would get the same result here at all. you were not involved with the dispute between members and royal puppies, sooo i don't understand why you feel the need to keep "defending" them. yes, i feel that you just keep bringing it up, just so you can defend them. i just don't get it at all....
__________________ mommy's little baby coco bear |
08-27-2005, 01:44 PM | #6 |
YT 500 Club Member Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 603
| What I would like to know if this is true, why would a 2 day trial cost over $20,000?. We are not allowed to express our feelings and concerns and opinions?...
__________________ Theresa & The Boys +1 The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue |
08-27-2005, 01:46 PM | #7 | |
Charmed by Sophie & Daisy Donating Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: North Alabama
Posts: 593
| Quote:
| |
08-27-2005, 02:40 PM | #8 |
Donating YT 14K Club Member | WOW! Now if the owner did indeed LIE about what happened to the pup, then I agree that he should pay damages. However, if the pup was indeed sick and obviously it was or else it wouldn't have died in 2 weeks. That is a shame both for the pup and the owners. No one should have to go through this type of heartache!
__________________ As always...JMO (Just My Opinion) Kimberley |
08-27-2005, 04:00 PM | #9 | |
BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Quote:
This post was not intened to be controversial in the least. I don't think it is. | |
08-27-2005, 05:47 PM | #10 | |
YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: seaside,ca
Posts: 1,763
| Quote:
__________________ mommy's little baby coco bear | |
08-27-2005, 06:24 PM | #11 |
Yorkie Kisses are the Best! Donating Member | Wow...I guess this is for ME. I know you have this same thread in off topic ...Why post it twice? The way I see it Kim is this way. IF someone has an experience with a PET STORE that is BAD I think people want to know about it. We all know about Pet Stores and I really think your purpose with this post is to offer more legal advise. I really would hope no one would open this site to defamation but are we really worried about this here in this thread ? I can appreciate that you went to law school but so many things turn into legal topics and scaring people into NOT posting things important won't help all the Pet Store puppies in the long run. I see lots of posts telling us how to do things on this forum but so far ...most things stay within the law. In my opinion ONE article that happened in Singapore is a fluke and unless it's totally absurd and damages a business and they can prove it - I think we should all be able to speak of our own experiences without worrying if we are going to be sued....after all - this is a Yorkie site....this isn't Time Magazine
__________________ Last edited by red98vett; 08-27-2005 at 06:28 PM. |
08-27-2005, 06:30 PM | #12 |
Mommy To 3 Poochies Donating Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 8,287
| Well said Villette
__________________ Mommy Loves Codie, Tia & Baby Cali RIP My Precious Katie - I Love You |
08-27-2005, 06:36 PM | #13 | |
Yorkie Kisses are the Best! Donating Member | Quote:
We learn alot from members who share their experiences - it would be a shame for people to be afraid to post something that could help another person. Besides - if something was ever said that was too far past the legal boundries - we have the DELETE key and the thread can be gone and no one gets in trouble. The Administrator on this site would know if someone is stepping over the line and I would trust them to take care of it. | |
08-27-2005, 06:40 PM | #14 |
Mommy To 3 Poochies Donating Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 8,287
| Well that's like poor Allison here a member on YT. Bruce's mom. She bought bruce from a pet store, before knowing much about them and now she's spending thousands to get his teeth fixed and ready for braces. His bite is soo bad that his lower teeth puncture the roof of his mouth. She came on here and warned us all about the store and she's trying to settle the case with them or she will sue them for selling her a puppy they knew had problems. I personally would WANT to know and would want others to know if this happened to me. The guy obviously didn't have a very good attorney, because I'd like to see a pet store sue me after giving me a sick puppy!!!
__________________ Mommy Loves Codie, Tia & Baby Cali RIP My Precious Katie - I Love You |
08-27-2005, 06:45 PM | #15 | |
BANNED! Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,246
| Quote:
| |
Bookmarks |
|
|
| |
|
|
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart