![]() |
Quote:
|
Jeanie I certainly hear your tone in the last several posts you have made...I don't think Yorkiekist has made the personal attacks that you have made here...Can we just be civil and exchange opinions?...Just sayin' |
Quote:
It takes two sides for a civil exchange...and there has already been a lot of that on this thread, so, no reason it can't continue. :) |
Quote:
Think what you want. it is only your opinion. people hear what they want to hear and see what they want to see and believe what they want to believe. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
JMO But I don't believe that the USDA does a very good job of policing the puppymills. The miller can set up one very nice kennel to get licensed and to use for inspections, then go on to keep dogs in buildings off the premesis. The licensing is just like the AKC registration, it gives people a false sense of security. |
Closing pet stores would limit impulse buying to some extent. But it wouldn't stop the person who picks a puppy from the ad in the newspaper or internet. Just because someone doesn't breed more than 50 pups a year doesn't mean they are a good breeder or that they aren't a small scale puppy mill. Unfortunately, some of the sickest dogs I've seen have come from the small scale backyard breeder. My best friend lives in Bakersfield. Her neighbor across the street flies just under the "puppy mill" radar. She gets away with it by having pens instead of cages. The pups (dachsunds) are never in doors (despite the heat there in the summer) and completely unsocialized. My friend has called animal control several times, but because she doesn't breed what ever the requisite number required for licensing, there isn't much they can do. Of course, we found out that some of her dames are registered in her daughter's name- so technically they aren't hers... As long as they have shade, food and water and the pens are "reasonably clean" (meaning limited visible feces, though the urine smell is overwhelming in the summer), their hands are tied. It would be interesting to do a study to see how many people have bought from a pet shop versus a private breeder. It's just my personal opinion that I believe more people have gotten their impulse puppies from the paper instead of the store. |
[QUOTE=Rhetts_mama;3219882]I agree with that. But then I would withhold AKC registration until spay/neuter is completed (as some breeders already do).[/QU I have no problem with that at all...but it would not affect the miller for a second...they are now almost 100% non-AKC..and if I owned a puppymill I would not go near AKC...I would use ACA..no regulates, no rules, no inspection, no record keeping, no DNA, no consequnces...do as you please. Don't you find most pet shop pups are not AKC now? Pets shops, even high volume breeders mix up puppies and breedings all the time...if you deal with a DNA registry you can have a big old mess if you screw up...I have heard of breeders having 3 yrs of breedings voided because of AKC DNA mistakes...so that is one reason most millers avoid AKC...and no inpsections..although I have never figured out how any miller with 100;s of dogs could pass an inspection. |
Quote:
It's a bill that would require breeders who sell more than 50 dogs yearly directly to the public to have licensed kennels and also beef up USDA's powers. |
...and there is also the broker's that sell in small, in-home settings, that give the appearance of perhaps a hobby breeder, not even big enough for a byb. but in actuality are selling for millers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
.. If they had to sell 100, 200, 300 puppies by way of the Internet each year...and that is conservative for many...it would be a difficult job. The public is getting wiser each day to the internet rip offs. Every complaint would fall right back on them, not the pet shop. Complaints should be reported to county and states and investated...huge fines for violators... It is not so easy to move large volumes of dogs without a middle man like Huntt corp..no one comes back at these breeders if the puppy is unhealthy, unsocialized etc...the pet shop gets the grief..the pet shop may stop dealing with a problem breeder, but doesn't look like most do.,or there wouldn't be so many sick puppies coming out of pet shops, right. |
I would hazard a guess that not as many puppies are strictly impulse (as in just happened to be passing by the mall and saw that cute little puppy in the window) versus someone who has gone to the pet store specifically looking for a dog because they wanted one. I could be wrong- but $1500 on pure impulse seems a little steep for most people. I have a feeling more of them had at least been thinking about it, searching online/paper and went to the store because they didn't want to wait until a litter was ready. |
Quote:
|
Jeanie- don't get me wrong. I think outlawing pet stores that sell puppies and kittens is a good first step. But I think it would be too easy for people to get complacent after that and think they've removed the whole puppy mill industry. There have been multiple cities that have banned them, and all it did was create a whole new industry of puppy mill brokers. As for the fact that AKC won't start making tougher regulations because people will just run to CKC or what ever: Is that REALLY an excuse for them to not do it? Just because someone else has low standards doesn't mean that mine need to be low, too. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use