I disagree. Blue and black.

I seem to be alone in my opinion that it's PURPLE What's your opinion on my opinion? :p

I think you should ask Mike Sagman. It depends on how many stars you see.

Don't make me bring out the hammer :eek: :cool:

I think it depends on the materials used to make it. :D

WTH I thought it was orange and red. Geez, I might be ready for the hammer.

I tried with :cool: and ;) but it still looks purple to me. :confused:

Gucci didn't care for Orijen.

Just sharing what you, I'm pretty sure, already know to help others.

Acana Dog Food Review & Ingredients Analysis
{"Differences Between Orijen And Acana
According to the company, both foods specialize in “biologically appropriate” diets made with fresh regional ingredients. Orijen has a higher meat protein content than Acana. Orijen dog food is made with 75 to 80 percent meat, while Acana dog food is made with 40 to 65 percent meat, depending on the specific formula. Orijen dog food formulas have between 38 and 42 percent protein, while Acana dog food formulas contain protein levels in the 27 to 34 percent range. There is also a difference between Orijen dog food and Acana dog food with regard to carbohydrate levels. Orijen dog food formulas range from 18 to 22 percent carbohydrate, while Acana dog food formulas are generally in the 28 to 30 percent carbohydrate range. With regard to the amount of fresh meat, Orijen dog food is made with up to 40 percent fresh meats, compared to Acana dog food, which generally has from 9 to 15 percent fresh meats. There is also a difference in fresh meat variety. Orijen dog food contains at least five fresh meats, whereas Acana dog food contains three fresh meat ingredients. Because of these small differences, Acana is priced slightly lower and is more affordable for some pet owners. But the quality of the ingredients is the same."}

Around here, Acana is no less in price than Orijen.

Champion has some great marketers.
As of about two years ago sime things came to light about ingredients.
the thread is here somewhere. Something may have changed by now.

It can be called frsh because it is not frozen. The fish used was, in fact, considered fit for human consumption...and the preferred parts were taken at the human food processing factory. After the parts used for fish sticks were taken the rest is of the carcass was sent to Champion. Then (key word here) the rest of the usable parts were used in the dog food. Sounds like byproducts to me. Not necessarily a bad thing..except for the people buying their food because this is an ingredient they choose to avoid.

Reference links were given in the old thread.

This is the kind of thing that pisses me off about pet food - very shady business. I honestly don't mind paying a premium price for a premium food but it seems like their all the same just some have better marketing and that shouldn't even be allowed by law!