bellasmomok | 08-26-2010 12:41 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie May
(Post 3252534)
Well it sounds like it would be way too easy to lick then. I couldn't trust it if that's the case... Just had a convo with Ellie's vet about flea meds. It is becoming more apparent that fleas are becoming resistant to fipronil anyway. So more and more vets will probably be moving away from it. Sentinel (Program) is supposed to be a good replacement right now (but she is waiting on info about it and then she'll pass it on...).
And the spray doesn't have methoprene, does it? | The spray does NOT have methoprene in it! (The methoprene in the PLUS is what kills the eggs and larvae, which is why the spray only kills adults. But the spray does kill ticks too, within 48 hrs.)
I'm not sure about the licking....that does make sense though. But then it would make sense for all the drops as well since they continuously redistribute the meds over the skin through the oils. Hmmm, good point about the licking....
The reason I don't like Sentinel (Program) is that it's systemic and stays in the blood stream!! :eek: AND, the flea has to bite and ingest that blood in order to die. Whereas the topical ones aren't systemic and will die without biting. Although, if fleas are becoming resistant to fiprinil, then what other choice do we have....?? :confused: Quote:
Originally Posted by BonBon
(Post 3252571)
That's interesting. I've never heard that. I've been using the spray for almost 2 years and I haven't seen a single flea or tick in that time (& we do have a lot of both here in Oklahoma). I have always sprayed only behind the neck, between the shoulder blades - the same place I used to apply the drops. And I only apply half of what the spray bottle directions say to use.
Well, as long as it's working I'll keep using it. I really prefer the spray over the drops because it's so much easier to control the dosage.
Thanks for the information! :) | You're welcome! We actually just moved to WI from OK! :D When I 1st started using Frontline spray, I was told by my vet to get her damp all over. Over time, I reasoned myself out of doing that, because I thought the reason for dampening them all over was just to control a flea infestation (which is what vets use it in office for), and I figured that if it's absorbed, then it must redistribute like the drops. According to Merial, that is NOT the case, HOWEVER I have been spray Bella right down the spine for a long time now. And I hadn't seen a single flea until a few weeks ago, when I did find 1 lone flea on her, but it wasn't doing so well. It was empty, so it hadn't bit her, and I flea combed her 3 separate times over 24 hrs and didn't find any more. I'm a little skeptical about what I was told today, given those facts. The question is, do I keep doing what I've been doing?? Or do I do what Merial says...which means I'll have to spray WAY more to dampen her whole body! :eek: I just don't like that....really, I don't like any of our options. :( Ugh!!!! (Also, I'm worried more about ticks here than I was in OK because there are deer everywhere here!! And there must be a bigger focus on wildlife/land preservation here because even though we're in the city, we're surrounded by wooded areas. We don't go IN the wooded areas, but they're near enough that I'm certain deer go where we go! So, I want her prevention to include tick prevention....but therein lies the rub!:confused:) |