Originally Posted by roseylovestosho (Post 3627614)

I think they would've benefited from a bullet list style powerpoint presentation.

Originally Posted by gidget529 (Post 3627899)

Has anyone heard if Casey is going to be legally compelled to go back to Florida to live out her year probation for stealing checks (felony)? I heard the judge who sentenced her to that meant probation was to be served outside of prison not inside. He has since been removed (or stepped down?) from the case and Judge Perry is going to be deciding whether her parole needs to be served in Florida or if she has already served it while in prison waiting trial. Have not heard if it was decided yet?:confused:

Originally Posted by gidget529 (Post 3602042)

Wow. I do not think the concept of "civil duty" includes getting paid for interviews. So, I do not think this jury understands the concept of "civil duty". I think our founding fathers would cringe.

I also think our justice system is only as good as the critical thinking skills and IQ's of the jurors selected. (I know, sounds rude, but it is the cold hard truth!) If jurors lack the reasoning skills to understand the concept of "reasonable doubt", there is no hope for a just verdict. Also, if they lack the reasoning skills to understand the different charges brought againt the defendant, they are an ineffective jury. They also lacked the intellect to comprehend the judge's instructions not to consider the penalty when deciding on the decision of guilt.

These jurors lacked comprehension of this so much that in interviews they claim the punishment of death seemed extreme to them, so they could not convict. The punishment was not to be considered. Also, there was a lesser charge carrying a lighter sentence they were to consider. Once again, the lack of intellect of these jurors was appalling.

Unfortunately, a lot of research goes into how to pick a jury to ensure the desired outcome for either side. I don't think our founding fathers had that in mind either.

How could ppl w a healthy amount of critical thinking skills and IQ level only deliberate for about 11 hours w all the evidence presented, also w notes that they left in the courtroom? These are jurors did not take their civil duty seriously. I think the proof of this is in the pudding.

Originally Posted by yorkietalkjilly (Post 3631900)

So Judge Perry has ruled Casey Anthony will have to serve a year of probation. Has 72 hours to report.

Originally Posted by yorkietalkjilly (Post 3631900)

So Judge Perry has ruled Casey Anthony will have to serve a year of probation. Has 72 hours to report.

Originally Posted by yorkietalkjilly (Post 3631900)

So Judge Perry has ruled Casey Anthony will have to serve a year of probation. Has 72 hours to report.

Originally Posted by Rhetts_mama (Post 3631938)

This article says she has until 8/26 to report.

Judge: Casey Anthony must return for probation - TODAY News - TODAY.com

I'm glad that they aren't allowing her to avoid probation all together. The whole point of probation is to see if you can behave yourself while you are out and about in public, not if you can behave yourself while you are locked in a small room for 23 hours a day.

Originally Posted by yorkietalkjilly (Post 3631941)

So true. Never understood how in the world one could essentially serve out the terms of probation while incarcerated with maximum 24/7/365 oversight! How does that prove one can live in society as a regular person? It doesn't!

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3631965)

You inspired me to make a new avatar! I'm so frustrated over this case.

Originally Posted by roseylovestosho (Post 3631967)

Nancy, what happened to your fear of retaliation? Let me tell you...even with duct tape on her mouth she looks scary :eek:

Originally Posted by Nancy1999 (Post 3631969)

Lol, I'm hoping she'll be too busy today to read Yorkietalk.