![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Says you. I never said peta created the breed standard, peta is against breeding, PERIOD. What they did was try to put breeders out of business by shaming them for breeding dogs while there are dogs around that do not have homes. They created a hierarchy amongst breeders by pitting them against each other by creating tossing in the terms: reputable breeders, backyard breeders, and coining the term Puppy mill. Their goal is to push the public to adopt spayed and neutered dogs from shelters that cannot reproduce to kill breeding by taking away potential buyers. Then they try to push mandatory spay and neutering laws and heavy breeding restrictions. If they get their way, dog breeds will eventually start to disappear because the price of a dog will skyrocket and dogs will become a luxury if they survive. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its a fact that having parents of a litter of pups tested for genetic illness will not pop up with the illness that you test for. That's it. Unfortunately there are still plenty of other illnesses that can occur as well as illnesses that can be acquired, and mutations in genetics that don't show up on the test or happen down the line. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with being safe and genetic testing dog is a good thing, just not full proof. Back to the issue at hand, Some pups are totally ready to go to new homes before 12 weeks, lets just say that the best time period for dogs in general to go to their new homes is between 8-12weeks.Studies show that the ideal bonding time between dog sand their new owners is between 8 ad 12 weeks, after that they can become too attached to their birth home/family and litter mates and the transition that breeders are trying to avoid might worsen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m familiar with the stance that the YTCA has on the issue, there is a brief paragraph written on it. 12 weeks is merely a TARGET AGE by which a pup SHOULD be adjusted enough, as well as big enough to go out into the world into a new home, They should have two rounds of vacs, be eating regularly, and strong enough to handle the possible stress accompanied by the move to a new environment, with that said, a lot of puppies are ready before then. And letting them go if they meet their marks to new homes with experienced dog owners does not make them bad breeders. |
I know that this debate could go on forever. I can say that it seems that people are only met with a positive response if they are repeating and agreeing with what is politically correct. The 12 week rule is what is considered politically correct. We all agree that bad breeders should be stopped. It seems to me that all breeders should be judged by the way their puppies are raised not on the age that they are sold. I don't want a puppy from a reputable breeder that has been raised in a cage anymore than I would want a puppy that is raised in filthy conditions. Both options to me are unacceptable. There are reputable breeders that have their dogs in cages. To me a cage is a cage, whether it is a reputable breeder or a bad breeder. |
Quote:
LOL. That is virtually impossible because as you have stated MANY times, a “reputable” breeder in your opinion someone who keeps all puppies until they are 12 weeks old. Apparently, you believe that is a major corner stone into what goes into being a “reputable” yorkie breeder. Aside from the fact that I have stated the whole “reputable breeder” thing is merely a self-imposed bragging right that has more to do with the breeder then litters they produce. I simply do not care. There are far more important factors that go into being a good, ethical breeder the nitpicking over a week, long past the point when the pups are fully weaned, have begun vaccinations, and bonding with humans. |
Quote:
:goodpost: The thing that made me settle on my breeder aside from the pup that chose me by following me round and sitting on my shoe was when I went into the house and the whole place was designed to accommodate and incorporate the dogs into their home and family. Steps up to the sofa, toys scattered about,even doggie doors in the house room to room! |
to me that is the definition of a good breeder!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your wrong with your jaded veiw of breeders. You also can't show me a reputable breeder who does everything right except the 12 week thing. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
This argument you seem intent on having honestly belongs in some other thread. The OP was looking for ACTUAL ANECDOTAL ACCOUNTS of people who got their pups before 12 weeks. If you have none to share...... :scratchhe I believe it states clearly in the rules of the forum "If you have only criticism and nothing constructive to add to a thread - then DO NOT POST." I have no idea how what you have contributed to this thread would an any way contribute to the OP's thread. I commend and respect your passion on the issue but I'm afraid its misplaced in this thread. If you want to stand on a soapbox and celebrate "reputable breeders" why not make your own thread on the subject. ? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use