![]() |
|
Quote:
You claim you want documented proof then how about producing some yourself... :) You make all your views perfectly clear but with what??? Show me & others here on this forum some proof to bring us into your corner. Three years of research you should have some links or references or something in black & white for all of us to view that we can all learn from. I have done my research as I am sure many others have. I can only stress that the Club you refer to as being a member of IBC still refers to the Biewers as "Yorkshire Terriers" why would this be??? I think the history of where this breed begins is extremely important and should never be disregarded. I am not trying to start a debate I just would like you to share your wealth of knowledge with the rest of us and bring us all up to speed. |
Quote:
I would be happy to provide the history and the standard but it's the same one that I believe you and I agree on..and others as well. I think it's all in how we interpret the history or standard. Plain and simple..IMO we should only breed to the standard..NOTHING else! Here is the standard..truely says markings are specific..no mention of accepting b/g yorkies for breeding purposes. http://www.ach-l.de/Biewer-Z%FCchter.htm |
Just had to express my opinion here. I think pure Yorkies and pure Biewers are all beautiful. I would like to have a Biewer myself, but have a new Yorkie pup already, and don't want to pay the price for a Biewer. Personally, if I was looking for another furbaby and a Yorkie/Biewer mix came available at a good price and I did not intend to breed but have as a pet only, I'd JUMP at the chance. Go for it!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: You may have a really unique pet, and if it does default to look like a Yorkie, depending on the quality of the Yorkie parent, you may have a high quality baby at a reasonable price. Wish you the very best!!!!!! |
If it intrigues you as a pet, I'd say get one! :) It won't have papers, but that won't matter anyway as a pet. A pet isn't a "bad" word. They are adorable. They will neither have the "Yorkie" look or the "Biewer" look. The Biewer has a white base. The Yorkie doesn't have all that white for markings. However, the little white the purebred standard yorkies do have usually grows out. It will be interesting to see how these pups change and what they will look like as adults. However.....that is always a wonder for us with standard Yorkies :) . |
Quote:
I am very excited about my future family member... I did do some research on the biewer line and had serveral conversations with owners/breeders of Biewers. I understand about the standards for the Yorkie breed and the Biewer breed. I think both breeds are wonderful.... I am just jumping at what i think is a wonderful opportunity. Based on every thing i have read... there seems to be some relationship between the two... Showing and breeding are no where in my future plans for my new little one...In fact spaying will occur. But, it is interesting to read everyone's point of view. |
Quote:
|
Please read this entire post carefully before toasting me. Careful breeding can cause a specific line within a breed to produce certain traits. I don't understand dog breeding, but genetics is genetics. When I breed two quarter horses, I get a quarter horse. Occasionally a recessive gene will produce a trait that is not acceptable to the American Quarter Horse Association, which prevents me from registering that indivudal as a QH, but there are other organizations that would welcome and cherish the results. But, irregardless of what registery his "papers are in" the horse in view of genetics this is still a Quarter Horse. So, I guess my question, very respectlully and humbly is: What genetic pool did Mr. Biewer use when developing this GEORGEOUS little black and white dog? If the entire gene pool consisted of Yorkies with non AKC standard colors and markings, then the end result would have to be a Yorkie whatever the coloration. Please, I am not trying to start, or continue a debate, hurt feelings, or start a flame war, and I certainly don't want to get toasted. The Biewers are beautiful little dogs, to die for beautiful and I would just love to understand once and for all, using the genetic makeup sole determinating factor, are Biewers Yorkies with a lovely color pattern or are they a separate breed with a truly different, non Yorkie or Yorkie + something else genetic makeup? ps. guys, I have spent about 45 minutes trying to word this post so it isn't harsh, argumentative, ugly, hurtful, mean, rude, or truly ignorant. If I failed in my mission, I am truly sorry. |
Momofthree: I was so intense reading every post in this thread, and so confused -- and then I spent 45 minutes trying to word my question or commentary (lol) that I entire forgot to say: CONGRATULATIONS on your new addition. Can't wait to see pics! |
I think you did fine. I just PM'd the original poster of this thread because I didn't want to get toasted either. Here is my understanding and by no way am I an expert. I can only theorize what I have read. If this is incorrect please state it nicely. The Biewer is a color anomally from a Yorkshire Terrier. Mr. Biewer took the color anomally and worked very hard genetically to produce a certain standard that HE was working toward (as far as where certain marking should be). That would take a long time and a lot of weeding out to put it in simple terms. Those standards that he wanted to and DID achieve are not the Yorkie standard. However, he got it consitent enough that he wanted to call it a different "breed"...not a Biewer Yorkshire Terrier. Just a Biewer. However, the background of the Biewer from what I know did not have a new "ingredient" breed added to it. I could be wrong. Please let me know if I am. It is beautiful and will lose the markings and standards that he achieved if bred to a Yorkie. However, ONLY MY PERSONAL OPINION, if you read between the lines, it is not a mixed breed. It may resemble one because it may not follow either standard, but it is .... well....you know.... |
Maybe this will help. I am providing a couple of links that might help here. First link is the standard for the breed (mostly translated) This is the Biewer Standard This is a link so you will be able to veiw Mr. Biewers dogs http://www.ach-l.de/Fotos%20Biewer%2...%20Terrier.htm |
Quote:
This line made me giggle! Wonder what they know? :confused: :p "Legs and belly as well as chest hair knows" |
Quote:
The Biewer standard as written by Mr. Biewer calls for "Entsprechen dem Yorkshire Standard auBer Haarlange und Haarfarbe". The only differentiation he specified was to coat, color and markings. In his words he wrote of them as Yorkshire Terriers...I don't think it can be clearer than that. |
Quote:
|
And.... a double thank you for not getting upset with me. I am stubborn, hard headed and see in black and white (pardon the pun). Either they are or they aren't. I think Mr. Biewer answered my question himself by calling his beauties Yorkshire Terrier a la Pom Pon (I don't know what the a la Pom Pon means maybe with white? ) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use