![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
From the AKC website: "How does the AKC define a rare breed? When you consider FSS for your breed, please note the service is not open to “rare breeds” that are a variation of an AKC-registrable breed or the result of a combination of two AKC-recognized breeds. This includes, but is not limited to, differences such as size (over and under), coat type, coat colors, and coat colors and/or types that are disqualifications from conformation events by AKC breed standards. Since the labradoodle is "the result of a combination of two AKC-recognized breeds", and therefore cannot participate in the Foundation Stock Service program, it will never be an AKC recognized breed. https://classic.akc.org/enewsletter/...spring/fss.cfm |
Here are two interesting discussions on AKC acceptance of "designer dogs." Will the AKC ever recognize "designer dogs"? - Yahoo! Answers DS: DO you think the labradoodle will ever become a recognized breed? - Yahoo! Answers |
The term "designer breed" literally makes me feel ill! I find it shocking that people are paying for any mixed breed and that exact dog can be found in the shelter in seconds! |
Quote:
|
There have been many attempts to create a new breed of purebred dog. Few are truly successful. The AKC accepts very few of the new breeds presented for consideration. The "new breed" must present many generations of documented history of the breeding program. It takes many generations in order to get a new breed to produce a consistently uniform looking offspring. There are people who have tired to do this and never were able to achieve their goal during their lifetime. The "Labradoodle" and other designer breeds are not a breed at all. They do not produce uniformly consistent offspring and just like other "new breeds" they are being bred by people who have no knowledge of the background of their dogs. Putting one purebred dog together with another purebred dog of another breed does not produce hybrid vigor. It only brings forward the genes that both carry. Since people who do this type of breeding have little knowledge of the genetic background of those dogs the results can be truly disastrous. Sure some of the dogs are fine pets, but should never be used for breeding. Truly purebred breeding should be left to those who really know what they are doing. It is far more complicated than allowing certain dogs to mate. Millions of pets are put to death yearly in shelters while others die miserable deaths on the streets and in rural areas where they are dumped. Breeding to satisfy the pocketbook of greeders is not something many of us care to support. I am an owner and lover of purebred dogs and have also rescued and cared very much for mixed breeds. I have no prejudice concerning dogs. It is the breeders that I am selective about. |
Quote:
I love this statement! |
Quote:
Quote:
Think of what you want to be know for?? At this time you have been a little abrasive and I am hoping that is not the real you. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use