![]() |
Quote:
Of course, I don't see why the vet would diagnose the dog as anything other than 100% healthy, seeing as if she did say she found something, she'd have to treat it for free. |
I also agree that the fact that the pup doesn't have shots is rather concerning. Unless maybe the pup just went up for sale at 8 weeks, and the breeder wants to avoid paying for the shots if possible. If that is the ONLY downside to the breeder/the pup (i.e. there is a health guarantee, parents are in good health, the place is clean, the breeder is experienced, and so on) I wouldn't necessarily turn it away. If there are other issues, though, I'd buy a Morkie from someone else. |
Quote:
Because you told her to go the shelter if she did not care about what breed she got and that it would cost less, while I know a morkie is not a purebred breed to many people it is a type of mixed breed and that's what they want. It's also next to impossible to find a healthy morkie puppy in a shelter and even in a rescue organization and if there is there is a fee and the younger they are the more costly. |
My friend got a maltese mix at the shelter. The mom was pregnant and had the litter while at the shelter. She got her pup for $80. Sadly lots of pregnant mommies end up in the shelter. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
What some people here seem to fail to realize is that there IS a gray area. There are bad breeders, decent breeders, good breeders, excellent breeders, etc. There are not only bad breeders and excellent breeders. A breeder can be trustworthy and experienced, and breed healthy pups, and that makes them the dictionary definition of reputable. A good breeder. An excellent breeder would take all of that a step further. |
Quote:
|
What is a fair price to pay for a dog is really the question; and of course we all have our own opinions on that. We also have our own opinions on what makes a reputable breeder. A Morkie as a mixed breed can't have papers from any registry that means anything as registries are for purebred dogs. I truly don't know how one evaluates a breeder that does not breed for health and improvement of the breed standard. What benchmarks do you use? The mere fact that the house is clean? What about how the breeder develops over time those pups? Do they know what to do? Do they even care? How will they support over time their puppy owners? Seemingly healthy parents do not guarantee healthy pups. What vet care have the pups had? And \I find it a crying shame that many well what shall I call them? At home just breeding my personal pets are so prolific here in North America. No knowledge, no passion, no desire or wherewithal to actually breed healthy progeny. I bow out now from this conversation. |
Are you joking? Please tell me that you're joking. There are PLENTY of ways to tell if a person is taking good care of their dogs, and if they're breeding ethically vs being some sort of puppy mill/only-cares-about-the-money jerk. Look, all I'm going to say before I ditch this thread is that I've noticed that some people on this forum often call each other out for no good reason. A member may just be posting their opinion, or an experience, only to find that other people end up attacking them and/or dictating to them. Whether or not it is meant that way, it comes off as snobbish and rude the vast majority of the time. I'm getting tired of seeing it, and experiencing it. You can have your opinions, but that does not mean you need to go out of your way to try to invalidate mine, or anyone elses'. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use