![]() |
|
Welcome to the YorkieTalk.com Forums Community - the community for Yorkshire Terriers. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You will be able to chat with over 35,000 YorkieTalk members, read over 2,000,000 posted discussions, and view more than 15,000 Yorkie photos in the YorkieTalk Photo Gallery after you register. We would love to have you as a member! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please click here to contact us. |
|
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
No Longer a Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,410
| ![]() Animal abusers may think twice once California establishes the first felony animal abuser registry in the United States. Other states are considering to follow the example. California is preparing to be an example for other states looking to lower the number of felony animal abusers. To this they are proposing a registry of those who have been convicted of animal abuse and were charged with a felony. The idea came from the well-known and widely used, sex offender registries and databases. The purpose of the proposed registry is to alert communities, law enforcement and pet adoption agencies that animal abusers are in the area. The information would be made public with names, addresses and other information pertaining to the person. Liza Franzetta of Animal Legal Defense Fund has this to say in an interview with Fox News: In part, it's an attempt to give law enforcement a heads up when people like this are in their communities, so they can cut off problems at the pass.The cost of the program is estimated between $500,000 and $1 Million to set up and make functional. The annual cost to maintain it is thought to be around $65,000. Most people are asking where the money is coming from. As with many good legal ideas, the tax payers, however, this bill is taking a different approach. Pet food would go up a few cents a pound and animal abusers would have to pay more harsh fines. As will all politics, there are those that appose the idea because of taxes. Some are staying that it "unfairly" taxes pet owners. Not all pet owners are bad people or cruel to animals so not everyone should have to pay into the animal abuser registry. Kassandra Garcia |
![]() | ![]() |
Welcome Guest! | |
![]() | #2 |
Donating YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In my house :)
Posts: 5,219
| ![]() I saw this on the news and I think it's a great idea. I wouldn't mind paying a few cents more for dog food either...heck, they tax soda, cigarrettes, gas, food, dining out...basically everything we buy and no one really ever complains...this is one tax I would gladly pay! |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #3 | |
YT 1000 Club Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: ~CA~
Posts: 1,637
| ![]() Quote:
Has it been passed? I agree with the previous post! If a few cents or even one dollar can save a life! HECK it's ONLY $1 and it helps lives! I wouldn't mind. Just pet food or all pet related materials that you purchase? Otherwise, it would get kinda costy...but I still think it's worth it!
__________________ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #4 | |
No Longer a Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,410
| ![]() Quote:
I am with you! ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #5 | |
No Longer a Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,410
| ![]() Quote:
| |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
| |
|
|
SHOP NOW: Amazon :: eBay :: Buy.com :: Newegg :: PetStore :: Petco :: PetSmart