<sigh> I've been called worse. :p

True...True...:p

I do agreee it is all extremely ridiculous.

But I do want to clarify the comment about "crawling out of the woodwork"

The remark was made, to those who did not agree with the one who made the remark.

Yet that same person was thanking you and one other person (who also joined in the conversation this morning) for making comments that appeared to be favorable.

That was the point I was making.

I was not commenting on what you had said. Just that for all the people that had not commented before, that posted to this thread this morning, some of them were thanked, and others had 'crawled out of the woodwork"

I found it a little two sided.

It seems that at this point everyone is just jumping to the conclusions that everything that is said is directed at them personally. Which is not the case.

I find the entire discussion so riduculous that it is amusing.

we're arguing over whether 12 pound yorkies end up as rescues. :confused: there are bigger problems out there.

Being one of the only 2 people that you mention has having been "thanked," let me just point out that I did NOT "also join in the conversation this morning." I posted 2 days ago in response to the actual question posted by the OP--well before any of this silliness began.
Furthermore, it's not 'jumping to an conclusion' when you are mentioned by name or addressed directly. So again, please do not use me to make your points.

You commented to the OP on the original conversation

You were not a party to this particular conversation that was going on last night.

See there again, the "jumping to conclusion " was not directed at you. It was a general statement, I had finished with my comment to you.

Are we all clear now?

sheeeeeesh

"I was not commenting on what you had said. ...It seems that at this point everyone is just jumping to the conclusions that everything that is said is directed at them personally. Which is not the case."

So sorry for misunderstanding. You'd addressed me directly in response to something I'd said...given the overall vagueness of your responses, I'm sure you can understand how it's easy to misunderstand. Regardless to who you truly menat for, my name was mentioned in a certain context which you have now confirmed 3 times.

I'm sorry, to keep responding, but I feel the need to defend myself (heaven only knows why!) because I feel as if my intent is being purposely miscontrued to serve some other agenda. Yes, I posted early in the thread, and like I do with most threads I post in, I tend to follow them as the conversation progresses, just as I did with this one. I did post again this morning in a manner that I thought was and intended to be very neutral--stating that what had been said that had upset so many was not that big a deal, that it was being blown out of proportion and *trying* to draw attention back to the original purpose of this thread. And now suddenly because of someone else's response, I'm being 'patted on the back 'and 'coming out of the woodwork' to participate in a petty arguement that you feel is on a "personal level."

Yes, to answer your question, we are "all clear now." It is perfectly "clear" that I should have never tried to be the voice of reason to get people to see that we are all on the same page as far as the OP's dog is concerned. But hey, at least we can agree on how ridiculous this whole thing has gotten. :p

:lol tears:2popkorn::eyetearss:idontknow

And you know what...this whole ordeal has caused me to have a huge headache and I feel like all morning I've been trying to defend myself and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH YORKIES.
Geez, newsflash...generally speaking, there is no amount of money you could pay me to purposely get involved in the kind of arguing that has taken place here. So, if that is what it seems like I was doing, you couldn't be more wrong! And now I'm so confused, I've confused myself and I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore. And dang it...I try to make an effort to never confuse myself!

Peace out people...I'm going to get some lunch!

ME TOO, big ol' salad anyone??? :D

There must be a full Moon.

Yeah...that must be it...or something like that. ;)

Full Moon or not, I know how to walk away from pointless arguement where logic, mutual respect and rational thought have no place.

[QUOTE=ladyjane;2838599]Educating the public about rescue is never a waste of my time. That is how I view this.

[QUOTE]

I really don't see how the last several pages of arguing back and forth is educating anyone. I think it turned a rather informative and educational thread completely off topic.

We all love our Yorkies!!! :D

Thank you on the correction!! :D I guess thing's have changed quite a bit in 19 years:2omg:, as that's how long it's been since I've registered, I thought to be AKC registered they had to fit into the AKC standard. But back then I didn't know of any other kind of registration. Still learning :)
Again, thank you for the correction! :rolleyes:

Your welcome.

I bet the OP is laughing her head off :rolleyes: She will probably not be back on YT any time soon.