![]() |
Quote:
I also have a friend who bought her little guy from a Pet Store - they should PAY HER a huge award for the heartache she's enduring and though she still has him - he won't see 2 years old...THAT Pet Store knew how sick he was and even had him hidden away in the back - she literally saved his life - The worst part is she knows one day soon....she has to give him to Rainbow Bridge. Chances are he is ill from being transported in a hot truck or never got medical attention - either way - the Pet Store is the people who knew he was ill and sold him anyway. She loves him and will have the heartache for the rest of her life. I hold THEM solely responsible for what she and her baby are going thru. So yes...When we know of a place and can say this really happened - I think it's great to be able to help others |
Quote:
And you are wrong about it being a "fluke" and, IMO. one should always conduct themselves honestly and forthrightly so as to avoid damaging anyone or any business. It is, after all, the right way to behave. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carters Mom I know this is offtopic -- but . . . why post this here when you're only directing this comment to one person? *scratching my head* Wouldn't a link on the other thread or a PM serve a better purpose? It wasn't directed at one person. It was directed at the entire membership. It belongs here in General imo. If admin felt differently he is free to move it. [/Quote} You were the one that bumped your own thread saying you were bringing it to the attention of a member who started a new thread. Are you now saying it wasn't directed at ONE PERSON? |
[QUOTE=Carters Mom] Quote:
Read the second paragraph. I responded in the OT thread as well. |
I don’t understand the reason for the negativity behind some of the responses on this thread. I personally think Kim did YT members a favor in posting such an article to show how simply by going on any internet forum and posting negatively about a particular place, can possibly land you in a lawsuit. I usually try to stay away from controversial threads but I just felt compelled to respond to this one. I don’t understand why Kim constantly gets attacked for doing things as simple as posting an article that potentially might benefit a YT member. Unless there are underlying issues at hand that I am unaware of, I personally don’t understand all the negativity pointed at Kim. She is right in pointing out the fact that we do presently live in a litigious world. I’ve worked in the legal field for a number of years and you’d be surprised to hear about some of the cases that do go tried. I am in no way insinuating that it’s not in your right to warn people about bad pet stores selling sick dogs, but things like adding “IMO” is beneficial to know about when doing so. I also think this article will be most beneficial especially to those who have pending lawsuits against stores. Because in the eyes of the law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty therefore defaming a place (even if you truly feel it is guilty) of wrongdoing before legally proving it, can potentially land you in a lawsuit. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use