Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickSilver
(Post 3640113)
Most, if not all scientific research in the past fifteen years has debunked the idea of alpha/beta/omega ranking in dogs. There's a great book that covers recent canine research: Amazon.com: Dog Sense: How the New Science of Dog Behavior Can Make You A Better Friend to Your Pet (9780465019441): John Bradshaw: Books
One thing that "alpha-ness" doesn't address is that different resources may be more or less important to a given dog at any time. A non-confrontational dog may change his stripes when he's hungry. Or maybe one dog always gets human affection first, but doesn't care about toys particularly.
I have seen two contradicting arguments based on alpha theory on possessiveness. The first says that you should allow dogs to work it out among themselves, because dogs are happier when they know their place. The second says that you should not allow this kind of behavior, or even force the possessive dog into "last" place, because not intervening displaces you as the ultimate alpha.
Since there's no evidence for either side of the argument as far as I know, I vote for doing whatever you want. But of course, the wife is always right. :D Up with four-kneed elephants! |
Thanks for the great responses, everyone. I'd intended it just as a silly poll, but there's been some great discussion and, as usual, I learn things from discussions.
First off, the "alpha" issue. I went to the source I always go to for canine advice, Dr. Ian Dunbar at
Dog Star Daily, and I was beaten over the head by the "alpha fallacy",
The Alpha Fallacy | Dog Star Daily.
I'd read it before but evidently filed it away in a brain cell I was using for alcohol storage or something. I continued to think of Eddie as "alpha," even though his behavior at its worst is more of what Dunbar describes as a middle ranking male. According to Dunbar, they're the ones who most often think they have something to prove through aggression.
But toss out the terminology part of it, and I think what I'm doing is still close to being right. Eddie initially had a huge issue with toy hoarding and aggression. After a failed attempt to address it through Cesaresque techniques, I got some advice from a behaviorist. From that point on, I used positive techniques, and the only negative reinforcement he got was withholding reward (the toy) for bad behavior.
The behaviorist explained to me that it would likely be a lifetime battle. Currently, I'm left with a dog who still thinks the toys are his, but he won't fight to get them. As long as he doesn't fight and Jillie is willing to share, we have a balanced pack. It hit home just last night when he was given a bully stick and left it untended. Jillie took it and was working on it. Eddie moved within a couple feet of her and yipped a little as if he wanted it, but he didn't take it from her. That's a sign of a huge gain for us that I've been working on for 5 years. (I did take it from Jillie and give it to him while giving Jillie another).
In a perfect world, there would be no possessiveness over toys, but we haven't gotten there yet. I think Eddie's problems came from leaving the litter too early. He never learned to play and he never learned to share. I was able to stop the fighting, and from there I let them work it out on their own. I don't trust him 100 percent with toys around because of all we've been through, but I feel pretty darned good about where we are.
Of course, last night brought up another little twist. Eddie normally sleeps with his mama, but she hadn't come to bed yet. Jillie was snuggled up pretty close to me, where she normally sleeps. Well, Eddie hopped up, carefully picked a path around Jillie, and snuggled up right next to my face. Jillie had to move a few inches to give him the place he wanted, but she did it without raising a fuss. I wondered if I should allow it or not but decided they'd just worked it out on their own.
Ah, dogs, you gotta love 'em.