|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My opinion is this. If I were the breeder who sold her the limited reg dog, I would be livid! Point blank, the dog was placed on limited registration so that it would not be bred, for whatever reason. This owner was aware of that and did not honor her end of the agreement. You can reword it and spin it any way you want, but that is what it is. If you don't want comments and opinions, don't broadcast your personal business on a public forum. Especially one where the member but the dogs first and the feelings of the owners second. :) If nothing else, this thread made me laugh to see Mardelin, a decades experienced (sorry Mary) Yorkie breeder being schooled on AKC policies by a self-proclaimed non-breeder. Classic. Sometimes things I read just leave me scratching my head... |
Quote:
But, if you read her other thread you'll see that she had no intentions of telling her personal business until she was asked questions. So that's kind of my fault. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ladies, I hate to start this discuss and then run... but I have an appointment that I'm about to be late for. Have a good evening! |
Quote:
Eh, in any event...the circumstances regarding how it was brought up are irrelevant. It was, opinions were sought, and I gave mine....nothing more. Load up the bus...we're headed home. |
I know, I blame you 100%!:D Quote:
|
I have tried to be tactful a number of times here and this is just ridiculous. Ofcourse I knew about limited registration when I got him. I'm not exactly sure what either of your goals are here today other than harrassing some new people but it's getting old. All of this rolling your eyes and little snickering jokes between the two of you is quite frankly silly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
How about the other thread David something or other......female had puppies last night and they're already being offered for sale this morning...... You know it's about time YT members band together and bring these people to light.......if we don't newbies that are considering breeding/exhibiting/etc. will think this type of conduct is ok? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=BamaFan121s;2918942]That is a very disturbing possibility. :( I actually saw it mentioned on here by someone (Donna, maybe?) that she was a member here for years before ever making her first post. Yup it was me that made the comment :) I think I was a member for about 2 years before I posted anything maybe not that long but it's true. I read some to get a feel for folks. Donna |
I really would like to see YT change its rules about selling dogs. I think people should have to have posted X amount of posts and has been a participating member before they can post their litters. I don't like that people think this is a free place to sell their dogs and we do not have a clue about them. While I undertand people can fool people on here I think it might help a little and would be a good starting point. |
Quote:
But, in my opinion having a certain number of posts before you can sell a litter won't solve the problem. There's ways around that........Think about it and I think I've mentioned this before, there's a way around every rule. Newbie comes on or even a long time member. In the breeder section........My fifi has been bred. Periodical updates are given. There's a puppy watch..... In the nursery section puppy pictures are posted....watch them grow..... Most of the time these puppies are placed way before the 10 week rule......PMs are exchanged & puppies are sold The number of posts doesn't make you reputable....... But, I understand what you're trying to do; keeping people from just coming on to YT & using YT as a place to advertise their puppies.... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use