![]() |
Bile Acid Testing Are breeders on here doing bile acid testing on their dogs? If not, why not? I know the test is not 100% but I believe the problem is more with false negatives. |
They do not have a test yet to determine if your dog carries the recessive gene or combo of genes that would be at fault. Until they are able to isolate the genetic marker you can only make sure that you do not repeat breedings that produce liver shunt. Of course you must never breed a dog or bitch with liver shunt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I won't subject my dogs to a test where there is no indication that it is needed. If the ALT levels came back elevated, there was a history of it in my line, or one of my dogs threw a pup that was diagnosed with LS than there would be a need. I would guess that most responcible breeders do a blood panel and than would proceed from there if there is any indication that more testing is needed. |
Quote:
The ALT doesn't necessary go up until the liver is 70% damaged from a shunt or MVD, so you can't rely on a blood panel alone. I can understand not testing puppies but adults need to be. |
Quote:
|
According to further study that I've been involved in today ( I really love to study) a BAT really will bring no conclusive proof because of the following taken from Dr. Tobias's work on liver shunts: "A Liver shunt cannot be difinitely diagnosed by bloodwork; shunting can only be found by advanced techniques such as scintigraphy, ultrasound, portography, cat scan, MRI, or exploratory surgery." More interesting reading to be done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
To me, the scenario kind of seems like this: I am a 30 year old female, with no family history of heart disease, no risk factors, no signs, symptoms, etc. It's time for my yearly exam. Do I go in and have a complete heart work-up or do I just do bloodwork and other basic tests? It's not irresponsible if I don't have the whole work-up, because the factors and information I have available to me don't indicate it's necessary. However, at the same time, it wouldn't be wrong for me to have it done either. Just my 2 cents.....of course, everyone has the right to decide if it's important to them. I just don't think it's irresponsible not to do it. |
Quote:
I'm not even suggesting that it is irresponsible for breeders not to have BAT done. However, I want to be convinced why we should not have it done to every single Yorkie. |
[QUOTE=blitz;184150I'm not even suggesting that it is irresponsible for breeders not to have BAT done. However, I want to be convinced why we should not have it done to every single Yorkie.[/QUOTE] I don't understand why every Yorkie shouldn't have one either. I mean, less than a year ago I didn't know what a BAT was but now I had one done on Ellie and since hers are way too high, it is best to treat. That means she has to have Denosyl everyday ($225 a year), she should be fed more often (3 or more times a day), she should have fish oil and vitamin e (and not just because it makes her coat look better), her vaccines have to be done carefully and she can't have many and meds have to be liver friendly which isn't easy and Ellie's liver isn't that bad. I'm glad she doesn't have to be on anything else. So, going through this I don't think there is any reason not to test breeding dogs because it is just one more precaution to make sure the buyer doesn't have to deal with this. Of course Ellie is worth this but why not at least test to try and prevent the continuation of liver issues in the Yorkie? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use