![]() |
Quote:
Ditto! :thumbup: |
The way I look at it is that we all have opinions but we can not all be right all the time. Each person is an individual and as such deserves respect until proven otherwise. This thread is about our pets not about us and I believe our pets deserve respect ALL THE TIME. It does not cost me a single penny (or cent ) to be respectful in fact to be less than respectful makes me think first and at my age thinking hurts. If we respect our pet (friends, animal, child or any other name) then we are not doing too bad at all. |
I smoked for 26 years and quit 4 years ago. When I had my first dog I was a teenager so I wasn't allowed to smoke in the house. I now don't allow smoking in my place and it's my personal choice not to have my Teegy in a smoking environment. SWHouston doesn't see it as a problem in her animals. I know people who don't smoke who's pets have emphysema. I know many humans exposed to second hand smoke who don't have emphysema. I think some are pre-disposed to stuff. |
Teegy, That "pre-disposition" is what I was referring to, and I admit that my comparisons of water, food and clothes were somewhat arbitrary. There's lots of examples better than those. Again, my point being that just because Smoking is an elective issue, it was singled out (for the most part) when SO many other things need be equally addressed. PS: SWHouston be a he, not a she. :D |
Quote:
The only reason I posted was that I had a friend who had the poor cat and gave the animal all she could to save her. It was the Vet who said it was caused by the previous owner smoking so I thought it was a professional opinion to be respected. Apparently the vet told my friend that she would be amazed as to how many cases he sees in a year where the animal (cats dogs and birds) have a smoking related problem. I would never single out smoking as a problem what I did to myself is my problem nobody else's and I will gladly pay the price in the next twelve months for doing it but the animals do not have that choice. I just wanted to alert members that this COULD be a danger I did not wish to start any arguments and will not do so now. I remain respectful to you and value your opinion. |
Bryan, I did not think that you were singling Smoking out at all. My comment was toward the "general" consensus, that Smoking (or getting rid of it) is the answer to all our respiratory problems. That is far from the case. But, your confidence in the reliability of a "medical option', gives me pause. It is difficult enough, to acquire Empirical Evidence, as relates to those who can actually verbalize their condition. I just don't see how a Vet could quote such a preponderance of opinion, when there are no Trials or Papers to support that. The specific issue being, related respiratory problems, of an animal, as related to repeated casual exposure of Tobacco Smoke. NOW, I do know of studies of Birds (mainly Canaries) which have been utilized to do Trials on Gasses found in Mines. And, subsequently data has been accrued on the sensitivity of some Fouls, being greater than that of Humans. I do not know of any similar studies done on Dogs. I would urge you to take comments like that "with a grain of salt", specially if it may be coming from a devout Non-Smoker...:rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Bryan that would explain why in britain they used canaries in the mines |
Quote:
The canary would die quickly at the slightest amount of gas. I can not say I agree with using a canary but at the time it was the only way they new of detecting it. The good news was no canary was ever known to have died through passive smoking in a mine. !!! :rolleyes: |
AHHH HA HA HA HA HA :thumbup: :thumbup: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2003 - 2018 YorkieTalk.com
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use